BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          AB 950 (Chau) - Community Colleges: Full-Time Instructors
          
          Amended: June 12, 2013          Policy Vote: Education 5-3
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: August 30, 2013                                
          Consultant: Jacqueline Wong-Hernandez                       
          
          SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.

          
          Bill Summary: AB 950 prohibits a full-time faculty member of a  
          community college district (CCD) from being assigned a workload  
          with an overload or extra assignments exceeding 50% of the  
          full-time semester or quarter workload, with specified  
          exceptions.

          Fiscal Impact (as proposed to be amended): 
              Mandate: This bill may impose a new reimbursable mandate on  
              CCDs. The fiscal impact of this bill will vary by CCD; some  
              will likely experience additional costs, others will  
              experience savings, and still others will have no change  
              because they have local policies in place which mirror this  
              bill's requirements. The CCDs that experience increased  
              administrative workload and/or salary costs will likely  
              qualify for reimbursement through the state mandates claims  
              process. 

          Background: Existing law defines "faculty" as those employees of  
          a CCD who are employed in academic positions that are not  
          designated as supervisory or management, as specified.  Faculty  
          include, but are not limited to, instructors, librarians,  
          counselors, community college health services professionals,  
          handicapped student programs and services professionals, and  
          extended opportunity programs and services professionals.   
          (Education Code � 87003)

          Existing law defines any person who is employed to teach for not  
          more than 67% of the hours per week (considered a full-time  
          assignment) to be a temporary (part-time) employee.  (EC �  
          87482.5 and � 87882)  

          The term "overload assignments" refers to the practice of  








          AB 950 (Chau)
          Page 1


          full-time faculty electing to teach additional courses, with  
          additional pay, beyond their normal full-time teaching load.  
          Many colleges and universities have established policies  
          regarding overload assignments. These policies appear to vary  
          significantly among colleges and departments. Some colleges  
          require individual assignments to be approved by department  
          deans while others have negotiated district-wide caps that range  
          from one course to 67% of a full-time load. 

          Proposed Law: AB 950 requires that a full-time CCD faculty  
          member not be assigned a workload that includes overload or  
          extra assignments in excess of 50% of a full-time workload in a  
          semester or quarter that commences on or after January 1, 2014,  
          with exceptions for: a) a summer or intersession term; b) a CCD  
          with fewer than 3,000 full-time equivalent students (FTES); and,  
          c) programs in the Taxonomy of Programs Code 09 for Engineering  
          and Industrial Technologies.
          This bill provides that the prohibition not supersede the  
          pertinent requirements of a collective bargaining agreement  
          containing restrictions regarding limitations on overload or  
          extra assignments that are in effect at the time it becomes  
          operative. Any future collective bargaining agreement is subject  
          to this bill's prohibition.

          Related Legislation: AB 1826 (Hernandez) 2012 was substantially  
          similar to this bill. That bill has held under submission in  
          this Committee.
           
          AB 383 (Portantino) 2011, proposed a one-time stipend to a CCD  
          entering into a collective bargaining agreement prohibiting more  
          than a 50% overload. It failed passage in the Assembly Higher  
          Education Committee in January 2012.   

          Staff Comments: This bill mandates a requirement on all CCDs for  
          an issue which is currently subject to collective bargaining.  
          According to the Chancellor's Office, the most recent survey on  
          this topic revealed that 13 of 44 responding colleges indicated  
          that they have a policy or bargaining unit allowing full-time  
          faculty to have more than a 50% overload. For the Fall 2011  
          semester, of the 14,489 tenured or tenured track faculty  
          teaching community college classes, only 172 had an overload  
          exceeding 50%. For CCDs already in compliance with this bill,  
          there will be no immediate effect. It does, however, eliminate  
          the option of increasing overloads to above 50% in the future,  








          AB 950 (Chau)
          Page 2


          which could impact future collective bargaining and CCD costs.

          The ongoing fiscal impact of this bill will vary by CCD, for  
          those that currently allow overload assignments above 50% for  
          full-time faculty. It will also vary year-by-year for each CCD  
          depending on how the requirement to cap overload courses changes  
          the faculty teaching individual courses. In some cases, courses  
          that could have previously been given to full-time faculty will  
          be taught by part-time faculty, who are typically paid less than  
          their full-time counterparts (though this varies by department,  
          institution, and particular instructors). In those cases, there  
          will likely be wage savings.

          In other cases, a CCD may have to hire additional part-time  
          faculty, in order to keep its existing part-time faculty below  
          the 67% course load cap. Any administrative costs incurred to  
          comply with this policy change would be reimbursable, including  
          having to hire additional part-time faculty. This variation will  
          be ongoing and, thus, the fiscal impact will continually change.

          Many CCDs have collective bargaining agreements that include  
          overload caps for faculty, and they vary by agreement. The  
          agreements are unique to district conditions and local needs and  
          may change when contracts are renegotiated. Mandating one system  
          for all CCDs, as this bill does, will undoubtedly affect other  
          areas of collective bargaining negotiations because it removes  
          an option from being negotiated in the bargain. Restricting CCD  
          bargaining options may indirectly drive additional expenses.  
          Moreover, to the extent that local collective bargaining  
          agreements cap full-time faculty overload below 50%, this bill  
          could be seen as endorsing a higher cap.
          
          AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED: Author's proposed amendments specify  
          that the bill's prohibition does not supersede the pertinent  
          requirements of a collective bargaining agreement containing  
          restrictions regarding limitations on overload or extra  
          assignments that is in effect at the time the bill becomes  
          operative.