BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 966 Page 1 Date of Hearing: January 14, 2014 Counsel: Gabriel Caswell ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY Tom Ammiano, Chair AB 966 (Bonta) - As Amended: January 6, 2014 SUMMARY : Requires that the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) shall develop a five-year plan to expand the availability of condoms in all California prisons. EXISTING LAW : 1)Proscribes that any person who participates in an act of sodomy with any person of any age while confined in any state prison or local detention facility shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison or in a county jail for not more than one year. (Pen. Code, § 286, subd. (e).) 2)Provides that persons participating in an act of oral copulation while confined in any state prison or local detention facility shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison or in a county jail for a period of not more than one year. (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (e).) 3)Declares that the spread of HIV/AIDS within prison and jail populations presents a grave danger to inmates within those populations, law enforcement personnel, and other persons in contact with a prisoner infected with the AIDS virus, both during and after the prisoner's confinement. (Pen. Code, § 7500.) 4)Prohibits all sex acts, illegal and consensual, between inmates. (15 California Code of Regulations 3007.) 5)Requires CDCR, contingent on the availability of funding, to provide HIV/AIDS health and prevention information to inmates. (Pen. Code, § 5008.1(a).) 6)Provides that an inmate may request HIV testing of another inmate if he or she reasonably believes that he or she has come into contact with the other inmate's bodily fluids; the AB 966 Page 2 chief medical officer will make the determination whether to require the testing. (Pen. Code, § 7512.) 7)Authorizes the chief medical officer to order a test of an inmate if he or she concludes there are clinical symptoms of HIV/AIDS as recognized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (Pen. Code, § 7512.5.) 8)Requires probation and parole officers be notified when an inmate being released from incarceration is infected with AIDS, and permits these officers to notify certain persons who will come into contact with the parolee or probationer if authorized by law. (Pen. Code, § 7501, subd. (c).] FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : 1)Author's Statement : "Sexually transmitted disease is a tragic reality of life in prison. The HIV/AIDS infection rate in prison is estimated to be at least 8 to 10 times higher than among the general population. "AB 966 requires CDCR to develop a five-year plan to offer condoms in all California prisons, giving the department wide discretion in program development within its existing authority. "The bill is based on the successful findings of a Solano State Prison condom pilot project conducted in 2008. The purpose of that pilot project was to determine the practicality and safety of condom distribution in a state prison. The program was an indisputable success. My office carefully drafted last year's AB 999 and this year's AB 966 based on the findings from that pilot project. Once we had the data, the next logical step going forward was program expansion. "The data speaks for itself. AB 966 is a simple and sound preventative public health policy that is evidence -based, cost effective, informed by a highly successful pilot project, and will save lives. Our Legislature has attempted three times in the past to mandate condom distribution in our state prisons and was disappointed with vetoes. AB 966 refines and AB 966 Page 3 retools those other efforts and brings all stakeholders together, including CDCR, to stand up for the vulnerable communities who are being affected by this devastating disease." 2)HIV/AIDS in CDCR : According to CDCR's data, an average of 1,240 inmates are infected with HIV/AIDS in California's prisons. CDCR estimates the cost of care for these inmates at over $18 million. Because CDCR does not require HIV testing, the true number of infected inmates is unknown. According to the University of California, San Francisco, the rate of HIV infection among inmates is eight to ten times higher than among the general population. Various studies provided by the author attribute this high rate to intravenous drug use prior to incarceration. Due to the difficultly in conducting studies and limited availability of information, the rate causes of infection for inmates after incarceration are unknown. However, these studies estimate that sexual activity is the leading cause for HIV infection in prison. 3)Evaluation of a Prisoner Condom Access Pilot Program Conducted in One California Prison Facility : In his veto message of AB 1334 (Swanson), of the 2007-08 Legislative Session, the Governor called for a study of the risk and viability of such a program by identifying one state prison facility for the purpose of allowing non-profit and health agencies to distribute sexual barrier devices. According to a report issued in 2011, "Although prohibited in prisons, sexual activity occurs during incarceration. Custody staff cannot be expected to prevent all sex among prisoners. Outbreaks of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in correctional settings, including syphilis, gonorrhea, and hepatitis B, and in-custody transmission of HIV are well documented. The use of condoms prevents the spread of STDs. Condoms are defined internationally as the 'single, most efficient, available technology to reduce the sexual transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases' (14). In 1993, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Programs on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) recommended that condoms be made available to prisoners throughout their incarceration and prior to release (15). In 2007, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime joined WHO and UNAIDS in recommending a range of risk-reduction measures, including AB 966 Page 4 confidential condom access for all male and female prisoners. Similar to most other correctional systems, both California Penal Code section 286, subdivision (e) and the California Code of Regulations, Title 15, § 3007 prohibit sexual activity in California prisons and jails, and concerns about safety and security operations pose barriers to initiating condom distribution programs. Based on the experiences of those advocating for or implementing condom distribution in a variety of correctional settings, many California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) correctional officers and other personnel are concerned that condoms could be used by inmates to conceal and transport contraband or controlled substances or could be used as a weapon (e.g., 'gassing') in assaults on staff or inmates. Staff and inmates also express concern that improperly disposed used condoms may pose a health risk. Custody staff may also view providing condoms as condoning or even promoting illegal sexual activity among inmates and that it could lead to increased sexual activity among inmates. Despite these concerns, condom program evaluation studies from jails and prison systems have found that: following implementation, condom distribution is accepted by a majority of inmates and correctional officers; inmates approve of dispensing machines in discreetly accessible locations; dispensing machines increase access compared with distribution in group health education classes; there were no serious incidents involving condoms; inmates used condoms for sex; and self-reported sexual activity did not increase. The New South Wales, Australia prison system condom program evaluation, with a 90 percent survey participation rate among inmates, found a statistically significant decrease in self-reported sexual activity following the introduction of condoms, possibly due to a newly introduced HIV/STD and hepatitis education program or increased awareness and reinforcement of prevention messages due to the presence of the condom dispensers. In 2007, WHO/UNAIDS/UNODC reviewed condom programs internationally and concluded that prison condom programs are feasible, accepted by a majority of correctional staff and inmates, have resulted in no reported security problems or serious incidents resulting in injury, and do not lead to increased sexual activity or drug use. "The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has urged correctional systems to evaluate existing condom programs, AB 966 Page 5 and, for systems without condom access, to assess relevant laws, policies, and local circumstances and determine the risks and benefits of condom distribution. WHO recommends focusing program evaluation on determining: whether condom access has unintended negative consequences for safety or security operations, the feasibility of implementing and expanding condom access, and conditions that facilitate acceptance among staff and inmates. In response to the WHO recommendations, over 80 percent of European Union prison systems, the Correctional Service of Canada, and prisons in Australia, South Africa, Brazil, Indonesia, and Iran provide condoms for inmates. In the United States, condom distribution programs exist in the Los Angeles, California; San Francisco, California; New York City, New York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Washington, D.C. county jails; and in the Mississippi and Vermont state prison systems. Condoms have been available to jail inmates in San Francisco since 1989, and to inmates in the Los Angeles jails since 2001. However, the 165,000 state prisoners in California have not had access to condoms, and a pilot program evaluating the risks, as recommended by CDC, had not been conducted. Consistent with CDC and WHO guidance, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, in his October 14, 2007 veto message of Assembly Bill 1334, directed CDCR to determine the 'risk and viability' of allowing non-profit or healthcare agencies to distribute sexual barrier protection devices (e.g., condoms) to inmates in one state prison facility, noting that, while sexual activity in prisons is against the law, providing condoms to inmates is 'consistent with the need to improve our prison healthcare system and overall public health.'" (http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/std/Documents/SBD%20Pilot_ Final%20Report_122210-CDPH-CCHCS_September2011.pdf.) 4)Problems with Condom Distribution : A major concern regarding condom distribution in prisons is their potential misuse as weapons or devices to hide narcotics. However, the European Union nations, Canada, Australia, South Africa, Brazil, Vermont, Mississippi, New York City, Philadelphia, the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, and San Francisco allow condom distribution to inmates in their prisons and jails; there are no reported incidents of such abuse. 5)Moral Objection to Condom Distribution : One complaint among inmates and correctional officers for condom distribution in AB 966 Page 6 prison is their moral objection to sexual activity between two men. Despite these objections, homosexuality occurs in California's prisons at a high rate. Denying sexually active inmates access to condoms exposes correctional officers, other inmates, and the community as many inmates risk infecting their families upon release. Does the moral and fiscal responsibility to protect the health of inmates and the public at large outweigh the moral objections of condom distribution? 6)Governor's Veto Message on AB 999 (Bonta) : "I am returning Assembly Bill 999 without my signature. This bill would require the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to develop a plan to expand the availability of condoms to all California prisons. The Department currently allows family visitors to bring condoms for the purpose of the family overnight visitation program. While expansion of the program may be warranted, the Department should evaluate and implement this expansion carefully and within its existing authority." 7)Governor's Veto Message on AB 1334 (Swanson) : AB 1334 (Swanson), of the 2007-08 Legislative Session, was similar to this bill and vetoed. In his veto message, the Governor stated, "I am returning Assembly Bill 1334 without my signature. This bill would enact the Inmate and Community Public Health and Safety Act, which would allow any nonprofit or health care agency to distribute sexual barrier protection devices to inmates in state prisons. As stated in my veto of AB 1677 last year, the provisions of this bill conflict with Penal Code Sections 286 (e) and 288 (e), which make sexual activity in prison unlawful. However, condom distribution in prisons is not an unreasonable public policy and it is consistent with the need to improve our prison healthcare system and overall public health. Local jail systems in both Los Angeles and San Francisco have already implemented condom distribution programs. Therefore, I am directing the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to determine the risk and viability of such a program by identifying one state prison facility for the purpose of allowing non-profit and health agencies to distribute sexual barrier devices." 8)Governor's Veto Message on AB 1677 (Koretz) : AB 1677 AB 966 Page 7 (Koretz), of the 2005-06 Legislative Session, was similar to this bill and vetoed. In his veto message, the Governor stated, "I am returning Assembly Bill 1677 without my signature. The provisions of . . . [AB 1677] would conflict with Penal Code Section 286(e) and 288(e). For this reason, I am unable to sign this bill." 9)Prior Legislation : a) AB 999 (Bonta), of the 2013-2014 Legislative Session, would have required that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) develop a five-year plan to extend the availability of condoms in all California prisons; commencing on January 1, 2015, that no less than five prisons be incorporated into the program each year; and develop comprehensive plan including every California prison by the final year. AB 999 was vetoed. b) AB 1334 (Swanson), of the 2007-08 Legislative Session, would have enacted the Inmate and Community Public Health and Safety Act, which would have required the CDCR Secretary to allow any non-profit or health care agency to distribute sexual barrier protection devices. AB 1334 was vetoed. c) AB 1677 (Koretz), of the 2005-06 Legislative Session, provided prison inmates with access to condoms for the purpose of reducing the spread of HIV/AIDS. AB 1677 was vetoed. 10)Argument in Support : According to the Friends Committee on Legislation , "The Friends Committee on Legislation of California (FCLCA), a Quaker-based lobby that advocates for state legislation that is compassionate and respectful of the inherent worth of every person. We support the right of communities to strive for optimal public health, and we are pleased to support AB 966. This bill directs the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to develop a five-year plan to expand the availability of condoms within the state prison system in order to reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases. "Despite the prohibition of sexual activities among prisoners, there is a much higher prevalence of HIV/AIDS and other AB 966 Page 8 sexually transmitted diseases in correctional facilities than in the general population. It is unreasonable to expect that CDCR could prevent prisoners from being sexually active. In addition, 95 percent of prisoners will return to their communities, which means that slowing and reducing the prevalence of HIV/AIDS in prisons is a vital public health concern for the incarcerated, prison staff, and the broader community. "An evaluation of a recent pilot program conducted at California State Prison, Solano, found no evidence of increased security risks as a result of providing condoms in vending machines. Using condoms is a low-cost, highly effective method of reducing the spread of sexually transmitted diseases." REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support AIDS Healthcare Foundation Alameda County Board of Supervisors California Medical Association Friends Committee on Legislation of California Legal Services for Prisoners with Children Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety Opposition None Analysis Prepared by : Gabriel Caswell / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744