BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 978
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 8, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                 AB 978 (Blumenfield) - As Amended:  April 25, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              Banking and  
          Finance      Vote:                            11-0
                        JEDE                                    8-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the Commissioner of Financial Institutions to  
          ensure state-chartered financial institutions are in compliance  
          with the federal Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability,  
          and Divestment Act of 2010 and associated regulations, and  
          states the bill will become inoperative if either Iran is  
          removed from the Department of State's list of countries  
          supporting terrorism or if the President certifies Iran has  
          stopped trying to make a nuclear weapon.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Minor absorbable costs to the Department of Financial  
          Institutions to monitor compliance with federal law.

           COMMENTS  

        1)Purpose.   According to the author, California continues to aid  
            Congress in its efforts to increase economic pressure on Iran  
            to cease its pursuit of nuclear weapons. The author argues the  
            serious and urgent nature of the threat from Iran demands that  
            states, together with the federal government, do everything  
            possible to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons  
            capability.   The author adds AB 978 would ensure  
            state-chartered banks are reviewed regularly for compliance  
            with federal Iran sanctions developed to stem the flow of  
            funds to Iran and terrorists groups as identified by the  
            federal government.

        2)Background  .  Financial institutions in the U.S. and California,  








                                                                  AB 978
                                                                  Page  2

            irrespective of state or federal charters, must comply with  
            sanctions established by federal statute and/or Presidential  
            executive order.  The mere fact that a bank or credit union is  
            regulated by a state regulator does not lesson, nor detract  
            from their compliance responsibilities with these and a  
            multitude of other federal laws.  A failure of these entities  
            to comply with the myriad of sanctions or the United States  
            Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control list  
            could result in severe federal penalties.

            The Iran Sanctions Act, requires the U.S. Department of the  
            Treasury to prohibit, or impose strict conditions on, an  
            account in this country or a payable-through account for a  
            foreign financial institution that the U.S. Department of the  
            Treasury finds knowingly facilitates the efforts of Iran to  
            acquire or develop weapons of mass destruction, or provides  
            support for organizations designated as foreign terrorist  
            organizations.  This includes the efforts of the Central Bank  
            of Iran or any other Iranian financial institution, Iran's  
            Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and other individuals or  
            third parties.  

        3)Previous legislation  .

             a)   AB 1650 (Feuer/Blumenfield), Chapter 573, Statutes of  
               2010, prohibits California governments from contracting  
               with companies doing restricted business in Iran.

             b)   AB 2160 (Blumenfield) Chapter 479, Statutes of 2012,  
               prevents investments in Iran from counting as assets that  
               would otherwise be considered when judging the financial  
               solvency of insurers to do business in California.

        1)There is no registered opposition to this bill.  




           Analysis Prepared by  :    Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081