BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 996
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 15, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                    AB 996 (Dickinson) - As Amended:  May 6, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              AgricultureVote:4  
          - 0 

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill expands Certified Farmers' Market (CFM) laws,  
          requirements, and fees, and increases penalties for violations.   
          Specifically, this bill:  

          1)Increases the misdemeanor fee, punishable by county jail for  
            up to six months and/or a fine of up to $2,500, for any person  
            or entity that intentionally makes an intentionally false  
            representation, by any means, relating to the sale or  
            availability of agricultural products. 

          2)Provides that, in lieu of prosecution, the Secretary of the  
            California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), or a  
            county agricultural commissioner (CAC) under CDFA's authority,  
            may levy a penalty against violators amounting to not less  
            than five hundred dollars ($500) nor more than five thousand  
            dollars ($5,000) per violation.

          3)Creates the Direct Agricultural Marketing Penalty Account  
            (DAMPA) and requires all penalties collected pursuant to this  
            chapter to be deposited into DAMPA, and requires funds to be  
            used to conduct investigations and enforcement of compliance  
            with this chapter. Authorizes a continuous appropriation of  
            DAMPA funds, without regard to fiscal year.  

          4)Authorizes CDFA to create a registration fee, not to exceed  
            $50, that is reflective of actual cost of processing.  Fees  
            are to be deposited into the CDFA fund and be used for  
            administration of this section.

          5)Reduces the CFM vendor fee from $0.60 to $0.50 per day, per  








                                                                  AB 996
                                                                  Page  2

            stall and extends the fee sunset from January 1, 2014 to  
            January 1, 2016.

          6)Creates a new $1 fee for all vendors to be used to fund  
            investigation and enforcement. Sunsets this fee January 1,  
            2016.

            FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)The current CDFA budget for administering the CFM program is  
            $240,000 per year.  The enforcement and registration  
            expansions included in this bill would likely cost an  
            additional $1 million per year. 

          2)The stall fee, the registration fee and the penalties  
            contained in the bill should generate in excess of $750,000  
            per year in revenue for the CFM Program. 
           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  . A few years ago a Los Angeles television station did  
            an undercover story exposing a certified producer who was not  
            producing what he was selling. CDFA put a task force together  
            to attempt to evaluate the program and develop new  
            requirements for operating and participating in a CFM.  

            AB 996 uses the task force recommendations to restructure and  
            expand the requirements for CFMs, producers, and adjacent  
            non-agricultural markets.  It establishes a specific  
            inspection and enforcement fee, and reduces the daily stall  
            fee, but broadens the pool of payers to include those that  
            participate in adjacent non-agricultural markets.  It requires  
            producers to declare they are selling what they grow, creating  
            a claim that can be challenged by district attorneys or  
            citizens, modeled after current Business and Professions Code  
            false advertising statutes. 

           2)Certified Farmers' Markets  . Certified farmers' markets have  
            become established in many California communities, as have  
            other outlets for direct marketing, such as farm stands and  
            community supported agriculture.  There are roughly 800  
            farmers' markets in California, a significant number of which  
            operate year-round. Following the enactment of the Federal  
            Farmer to Consumer Direct Marketing Act of 1976, CDFA enacted  
            regulations that exempted farmers from packing, sizing and  
            labeling requirements for fresh fruits, nuts, and vegetables  








                                                                  AB 996
                                                                  Page  3

            and enabled them to sell products they grow at farmers'  
            markets, provided they receive certification from the county  
            agricultural commissioner.  

            Many CFMs have adjacent non-agricultural markets selling all  
            types of homemade and commercial products.  

            As CFMs become more popular, the willingness of a few  
            producers to sell produce they did not grow, or other products  
            they did not produce, is a concern to CFM operators.  In 1999  
            the Legislature enacted a daily per stall fee of sixty cents,  
            intending it to be used by CDFA and CAC for inspections and  
            enforcement purposes.  Due to the growth of the program and  
            reductions in GF support to the CDFA, the fee has had to be  
            used to administer the program and not for inspection and  
            enforcement as originally intended.  
           


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081