BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                     SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE
                            Senator Lois Wolk, Chair
          

          BILL NO:  AB 1012                     HEARING:  6/19/13
          AUTHOR:  Gomez                        FISCAL:  Yes
          VERSION:  5/7/13                      TAX LEVY:  No
          CONSULTANT:  Grinnell                 

                                COUNTY TAX BILLS
          

          Renders inoperative requirement to include information  
          regarding defunded assistance programs on property tax  
          bills


                           Background and Existing Law  

          California has established several programs to assist  
          income-eligible, disabled, or seniors with costs of  
          housing, including the Senior Citizens and Disabled  
          Citizens Property Tax Postponement Law, the Senior Citizens  
          Tenant-Stockholder Property Tax Postponement Law, the  
          Senior Citizens Mobilehome Property Tax Postponement Law,  
          and the Senior Citizens Possessory Interest Holder Property  
          Tax Postponement Law.  The programs allow the Controller to  
          pay property taxes to county tax collectors on behalf of  
          individuals over the age of 62 or disabled persons making  
          less than $39,000 in income per year.  The claimant must  
          repay the Controller upon sale of the home, who secures the  
          loan by recording a lien.  Loans do not become due and  
          payable if the claimant or the claimant's spouse continues  
          to occupy the home secured by the lien.  In 2009, the  
          Legislature prohibited persons from filing new claims for  
          property tax postponement, and the Controller from  
          accepting applications, due to the state's fiscal problems  
          (SBx3 8, Ducheny, 2009).   owever, the Legislature  
          partially resurrected the program when it authorized  
          counties to similarly defer property taxes for fund  
          postponements for income-eligible seniors using its own  
          excess cash (AB 1090, Blumenfield, 2011).  To date, only  
          Santa Cruz County has granted postponements under the bill.

          These programs are distinct from the  
          Gonsalves-Deukmejian-Petris Senior Citizens Property Tax  
          Assistance Program (PTAP), administered by the Franchise  
          Tax Board, which is a direct grant program to  




          AB 1012 - 5/7/13 -- Page 2



          income-eligible senior citizens.   The State has not funded  
          PTAP since the 2007-08 Budget, so the state has not paid  
          claims more recently than those made in 2007.  

          The Legislature required each County Tax Collector to  
          include a notice with the property tax bill informing  
          taxpayers about PTAP and the Postponement Program, and  
          required FTB to prepare the notice for both programs (AB  
          199, Hannigan, 1979).  As both programs are on indefinite  
          hold, the State Controller wants to absolve tax collectors  
          from having to include the notice on the bill, and FTB's  
          responsibility to prepare it, so that taxpayers aren't  
          notified of a program that doesn't offer benefits  
          currently.


                                   Proposed Law  

          Assembly Bill 1012 renders inoperative the requirement that  
          counties send the notice regarding property tax assistance  
          and postponement along with the property tax bill until the  
          first lien date for which the state provides funding.  The  
          bill does the same to FTB's mandate to prepare the notice.


                               State Revenue Impact
           
          FTB states that the bill does not impact state revenues.


                                     Comments  

          1.   Purpose of the bill  .  According to the author,  
          "Assembly Bill 1012 would suspend an outdated notification  
          requirement in RTC 2615.6.  Given the suspension of both  
          the postponement program and the assistance program this is  
          an obsolete requirement which requires unnecessary work at  
          the SCO and FTB to annually prepare the statement and  
          handle the flood of inquires received when county tax bills  
          are mailed.  Furthermore, AB 1012 would save unnecessary  
          frustration and disappointment experienced by disabled  
          people and senior citizens when they discover they are  
          responding to an obsolete notice about programs that were  
          suspended several years ago.  When operational, the  
          programs provided property tax benefits for elderly and  
          disabled individuals who met certain criteria for  





          AB 1012 - 5/7/13 -- Page 3



          low-income and equity in their property.  The assistance  
          program provided a direct grant to qualifying seniors and  
          disabled individuals who own or rent a residence.  The  
          postponement program allowed eligible homeowners to defer  
          payment of all or a portion of the property taxes on their  
          residence.  When county tax collectors bill property owners  
          for annual property taxes owed, current law requires them  
          to include a notice on the bill informing taxpayers about  
          the programs.  Even though both programs have been  
          suspended, every year, the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) and  
          the SCO, by law, must prepare the language for the notice  
          and provide it to the counties for inclusion in their tax  
          bills."


                                 Assembly Actions  

          Assembly Revenue and Taxation9-0
          Assembly Appropriations       17-0
          Assembly Floor           74-0
                        Support and Opposition  (06/13/13)

           Support  :  State Controller John Chiang.  

           Opposition  :  None received.