Amended in Senate August 19, 2014

Amended in Senate May 19, 2014

Amended in Assembly April 16, 2013

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 1043


Introduced by Assembly Member Chau

(Coauthor: Senator Hernandez)

February 22, 2013


An act to amend Section 75101 of the Public Resources Code, relating to groundwater.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1043, as amended, Chau. Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006: groundwater contamination.

The Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006, an initiative statute approved by the voters as Proposition 84 at the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, makes approximately $5.4 billion in bond funds available for safe drinking water, water quality and supply, flood control, natural resource protection, and park improvements. The initiative bond act makes $60,000,000 available to the Statebegin delete Department of Public Healthend deletebegin insert Water Resources Control Boardend insert for the purpose of loans and grants for projects to prevent or reduce contamination of groundwater that serves as a source of drinking water and requires the department to require repayment for costs that are subsequently recovered from parties responsible for the contamination. Existing law requires thebegin delete departmentend deletebegin insert State Department of Public Healthend insert, in collaboration with the Department of Toxic Substances Control,begin delete or DTSC,end delete and thebegin delete State Water Resources Control Board,end deletebegin insert state board,end insert to develop and adopt regulations governing the repayment of costs that are subsequently recovered from parties responsible for the contamination of groundwater.

This bill would eliminate the requirement to develop and adopt regulations and instead would require that costs subsequently recovered from a party responsible for the contamination, as defined, be repaid to thebegin delete State Department of Public Healthend deletebegin insert state boardend insert and deposited, and separately accounted for, in the Groundwater Contamination Cleanup Project Fund, which this bill would create in the State Treasury. This bill would require moneys in the fund to bebegin delete continuously appropriated, without regard to fiscal years,end deletebegin insert available, upon appropriation by the Legislature,end insert to thebegin delete Department of Toxic Substances Controlend deletebegin insert state boardend insert for a grant to the grantee that received a grant to prevent or reduce contamination of groundwater pursuant to Proposition 84 and subsequently recovered costs from a responsible party and repaid those costs to the state. This bill would require thebegin delete Department of Toxic Substances Controlend deletebegin insert state boardend insert to disburse the funds uponbegin delete receiptend deletebegin insert the approvalend insert of an expenditure planbegin delete fromend deletebegin insert submitted byend insert thebegin delete grantee if the department reviews the plan and concurs that the proposed expenditures by the grantee are consistent with certain requirements.end deletebegin insert grantee.end insert This bill would prohibit the total amount of a grant from the fund and a grant received to prevent or reduce contamination of groundwater pursuant to Proposition 84 from exceeding the grantee’s total costs to cleanup contaminated groundwater or prevent the contamination of groundwater.begin insert This bill would require moneys recovered from a responsible party in excess of the amount that may be awarded as a grant to be available from the fund to the state board, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for expenditure on orphan groundwater contamination cleanup projects and would require the board to consult with the Department of Toxic Substances Control when considering expenditures on orphan groundwater contamination cleanup projects.end insert

begin delete

Existing law, the Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act, creates in the General Fund the Site Remediation Account, and authorizes the money in that account to be expended by DTSC, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for direct site remediation costs.

end delete
begin delete

The bill would require moneys recovered from a responsible party in excess of the amount that may be awarded as a grant to be transferred to the Site Remediation Account, to be used for certain orphan groundwater contamination cleanup projects.

end delete

Vote: begin delete23 end deletebegin insertmajorityend insert. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P3    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 75101 of the Public Resources Code is
2amended to read:

3

75101.  

(a) (1) Costs subsequently recovered from a party
4responsible for the contamination pursuant to Section 75025 shall
5be repaid to thebegin delete State Department of Public Healthend deletebegin insert state boardend insert and
6deposited in the Groundwater Contamination Cleanup Project
7Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Costs
8recovered shall be separately accounted for within the Groundwater
9Contamination Cleanup Project Fund.

10(2)  begin deleteNotwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code,
11moneys end delete
begin insertMoneys end insertin the Groundwater Contamination Cleanup
12Project Fund arebegin delete continuously appropriated, without regard to
13fiscal years,end delete
begin insert available, upon appropriation by the Legislature,end insert to
14thebegin delete Department of Toxic Substances Controlend deletebegin insert state boardend insert for the
15purpose of a grant to the grantee that received funds and
16subsequently recovered costs from a responsible party and repaid
17those costs to the state in the following priority order:

18(A) Projects and activities to clean up areas of groundwater
19contamination within the grantee’s jurisdiction where the initial
20grant awarded pursuant to Section 75025 is insufficient to pay for
21the full costs of the cleanup.

22(B) Projects and activities to clean up additional areas of
23groundwater contamination within the grantee’s jurisdiction.

24(3) (A) The total amount of the grant awarded pursuant to
25Section 75025 and the amount awarded pursuant to this subdivision
26shall not exceed the grantee’s total costs to clean up contaminated
27groundwater or prevent the contamination of groundwater.

28(B) If costs recovered by the grantee and deposited in the
29Groundwater Contamination Cleanup Project Fund exceed the
30amount that may be awarded as a grant pursuant to the limit in
31subparagraph (A), the excess moneys shall bebegin delete transferred to the
32Site Remediation Account, established pursuant to Section 25337
33of the Health and Safety Code. Recovered funds deposited into
P4    1the account shall be used by the Department of Toxic Substances
2Control for orphan groundwater contamination cleanup projects
3at sites that are on the list maintained by the Department of Toxic
4Substances Control pursuant to Section 25356 of the Health and
5Safety Code or on the National Priorities List pursuant to the
6Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
7Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 9601 et seq.), as amended.end delete

8begin insert available to the state board, upon appropriation by the Legislature,
9for expenditure on orphan groundwater contamination cleanup
10projects. The state board shall consult with the Department of
11Toxic Substances Control when considering expenditures on
12orphan groundwater contamination cleanup projects.end insert

13(4) The grantee shall use an amount awarded pursuant to this
14subdivision for groundwater contamination cleanup activities for
15groundwater that is a primary source of drinking water, including,
16but not limited to, ongoing treatment and remediation activities in
17accordance with the purposes of Section 75025.

begin delete

18(5) The Department of Toxic Substances Control shall disburse
19the funds upon receipt of an expenditure plan from the grantee if
20the Department of Toxic Substances Control reviews the plan and
21concurs that the proposed expenditures by the grantee are consistent
22with paragraphs (2) to (4), inclusive.

end delete
begin insert

23(5) When seeking grant funds pursuant to paragraph (2), a
24grantee shall submit an expenditure plan to the state board for
25projects consistent with this subdivision. The state board shall
26review the submitted expenditure plan and consult with the
27Department of Toxic Substances Control for projects where the
28Department of Toxic Substances Control is the lead state agency.
29The state board shall notify the grantee if the expenditure plan is
30approved, and if approved, the state board shall disburse the funds.

end insert

31(6) Grants awarded pursuant to this subdivision may be used
32for capital costs and treatment and remediation activities.

33(7) Commencing no later than July 1, 2015, and annually
34thereafter until the grantee’s funds are expended, a grantee of funds
35awarded pursuant to this subdivision shall provide public notice,
36by posting a list on the grantee’s Internet Web site, of projects and
37activities that receive grant funds pursuant to this subdivision and
38the amount of those funds.

39(8) As used in this subdivision, “costs subsequently recovered
40from a party responsible for the contamination” means the amount
P5    1of any judgment or settlement received by a grantee of funds
2received pursuant to Section 75025 from a responsible party that
3is attributable to costs funded by the grant received pursuant to
4Section 75025, less all reasonable and necessary fees and expenses
5incurred by the grantee of funds received pursuant to Section 75025
6to recover these funds.

7(b) For the purposes of implementing subdivision (a) of Section
875050, the Department of Fish andbegin delete Game,end deletebegin insert Wildlife,end insert when funding
9a natural community conservation plan, shall fund only the
10development of a natural community conservation plan that is
11consistent with the Natural Community Conservation Planning
12Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3
13of the Fish and Game Code).

14(c) The San Francisco Bay Area Conservancy may use the funds
15made available pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 75060 to
16restore the salt ponds in the south San Francisco Bay and to create
17trails and visitor facilities for public use in that area.



O

    96