BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 1043
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 1043 (Chau)
          As Amended August 22, 2014
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |78-0 |(May 29, 2013)  |SENATE: |32-0 |(August 27,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2014)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:   E.S. & T.M.  

           SUMMARY  :  Modifies the disposition of Proposition 84 of 2006  
          funds collected from responsible parties for groundwater  
          contamination clean up.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Allows local agencies receiving grants or loans from  
            Proposition 84 from the California Department Water Resources  
            Control Board (Water Board) for groundwater projects that are  
            able to subsequently recover costs from responsible parties,  
            to keep that money to fund additional groundwater cleanup  
            activities.

          2)In order to be eligible to use Proposition 84 funds recovered  
            from responsible parties, the local agency must meet the  
            following requirements:

             a)   Sites eligible for cost recovery are those authorized by  
               Federal Superfund  Comprehensive Environmental Response,  
               Compensation, and Liability Act, or other federal or state  
               law;

             b)   Requires an expenditure plan to the Water Board for  
               projects.  The Water Board shall review the submitted  
               expenditure plan and consult with the Department of Toxic  
               Substances Control (DTSC) for projects where the DTSC is  
               the lead state agency. 

             c)   Funds recovered from a responsible party that are in  
               excess of the costs to conduct a project shall be remitted  
               to DTSC for deposit into the Site Remediation Account for  
               orphan groundwater contamination cleanup projects at sites.

             d)   The Water Board may use moneys in the Groundwater  
               Contamination Cleanup Project Fund for the costs of  








                                                                  AB 1043
                                                                  Page  2

               administering the cost recovery for the local agencies  
               seeking these funds.

           The Senate amendments  provide the state Water Board is the lead  
          agency for the expenditure of funds recovered from groundwater  
          contamination clean up to reflect the reorganization of the  
          States Drinking water program from the California Department of  
          Public Health (CDPH) to the state Water Board.  Further, the  
          amendments removed the continuous appropriation of these cost  
          recovery funds and allow the Water Board to use funds for  
          administrative purposes.
           
          AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill modified the disposition of  
          Proposition 84 funds collected from responsible parties for  
          groundwater contamination clean up to allow local agencies  
          receiving grants or loans to keep funds recovered from  
          responsible parties to fund additional groundwater cleanup  
          activities.
           


          FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee: 

          1)Unknown costs, but potentially in the millions of dollars, to  
            the General Fund by redirecting recovered funds for further  
            groundwater clean up.

          2)Unknown costs to the State Water Board to receive recovered  
            funds.  These costs would be recoverable from recovered funds.

           COMMENTS  :
           
           Need for the bill:  According to the author, this bill is needed  
          "to allow local agencies that have been awarded Proposition 84  
          funds from CDPH for groundwater projects that are able to  
          subsequently recover funds from responsible parties to keep the  
          money to fund additional groundwater cleanup activities.  Should  
          local agencies be successful in recovering the costs from  
          responsible parties, this bill will save significant State  
          administrative costs and allow the local agencies to use all of  
          the recovered funds for groundwater cleanup."

          San Gabriel Valley groundwater contamination:  This bill is  
          supported by the Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water  








                                                                  AB 1043
                                                                  Page  3

          District, which is involved in the clean up of the superfund  
          sites in the San Gabriel Valley.  These sites include multiple  
          areas of contaminated groundwater in the 170-square mile San  
          Gabriel Valley.  The contaminated areas underlie significant  
          portions of the Cities of Alhambra, Arcadia, Azusa, Baldwin  
          Park, Industry, Irwindale, El Monte, La Puente, Monrovia,  
          Rosemead, South El Monte, and West Covina.


          Proposition 84:  Approved by the voters in 2006, Proposition 84  
          authorized $60 million to the CDPH for loans and grants for  
          projects to prevent or reduce contamination of groundwater that  
          serves as a source of drinking water for the San Gabriel Valley.  
           The CDPH requires repayment for costs that are subsequently  
          recovered from parties responsible for the contamination.

           
           Modification to Proposition 84:  When the voters approved  
          Proposition 84, the initiative included specific language  
          requiring the repayment of funds from those persons or  
          businesses that caused the toxic contamination.  The initiative  
          included Public Resources Code Section 75025, which mandates  
          that the CDPH require repayment of subject funds.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Bob Fredenburg/ E.S. & T.M. / (916)  
          319-3965 


                                                               FN: 0005487