BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de León, Chair


          AB 1089 (I. Calderon) - Foster care.
          
          Amended: August 4, 2014         Policy Vote: Human Services 4-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: August 4, 2014                            
          Consultant: Brendan McCarthy    
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
          
          
          Bill Summary: AB 1089 would specify the processes and timelines  
          to be followed by regional centers when a regional center  
          consumer who is in foster care is moved between regional center  
          catchment areas.

          Fiscal Impact: 
              Increased administrative costs to the regional centers up  
              to $200,000 per year for increased coordination between  
              regional centers and with vendors (General Fund and federal  
              funds). According to the Department of Developmental  
              Services, there are about 70 regional center consumers who  
              are in foster care and move between regional center  
              catchment areas per year. If regional center staff spend, on  
              average, one week coordinating with other regional centers  
              and vendors, total statewide administrative costs would be  
              about $200,000.

              Minor additional costs for services provided to foster  
              youth (General Fund and federal funds). By increasing  
              coordination between regional centers and vendors, the bill  
              is likely to reduce or eliminate gaps in the provision of  
              service to foster youth who move between regional center  
              catchment areas. Given the small number of foster youth who  
              move between catchment areas each year, the regional centers  
              are likely to experience increased costs between $5,000 and  
              $20,000 per year, depending on how quickly foster youth are  
              connected with new service providers.

              Minor administrative costs for county welfare agencies to  
              provide notifications to regional centers when a foster  
              child will move between catchment areas (local funds or  
              General Fund, see below).








          AB 1089 (I. Calderon)
          Page 1



          Background: California provides community-based services to  
          approximately 250,000 persons with developmental disabilities  
          and their families through a statewide system of 21 regional  
          centers. Regional centers are private, nonprofit agencies under  
          contract with the Department of Developmental Services for the  
          provision of various services and supports to people with  
          developmental disabilities. As a single point of entry, regional  
          centers provide diagnostic and assessment services to determine  
          eligibility, convene planning teams to develop an Individual  
          Program Plan for each eligible consumer, and either provide  
          appropriate services or obtain them from other agencies for each  
          consumer in accordance with the Individual Program Plan.

          Under current law, there are general requirements and procedures  
          on the regional centers when a consumer transfers from one  
          regional center catchment area to another.

          In recent years, there have been 1,700 to 1,800 regional center  
          consumers who are also in foster care. About 70 of those foster  
          youth move between regional center catchment areas per year.

          Proposed Law: AB 1089 would specify the processes and timelines  
          to be followed by regional centers when a regional center  
          consumer who is in foster care is moved between regional center  
          catchment areas.

          Specific provisions of the bill would:
              Require the county social worker or probation officer to  
              notify a regional center of the relocation of a foster  
              youth;
              Require the sending regional center to provide notification  
              and specified information to the receiving regional center;
              Require the receiving regional center to coordinate with  
              the sending regional center;
              Require the sending regional center to attempt to initiate  
              appropriate services in the receiving regional center's  
              catchment area;
              Require notification to the court, the county, and the  
              consumer's developmental services decision maker if services  
              have not been initiated within 30 days;
              Specify the notification requirements on the regional  
              centers.









          AB 1089 (I. Calderon)
          Page 2


          Staff Comments: Pursuant to Government Code Section 30026.5,  
          legislation enacted after September 30, 2012, that has an  
          overall effect of increasing the costs already borne by a local  
          agency for programs or levels of service under the 2011  
          Realignment shall apply to local agencies only to the extent  
          that the state provides annual funding for the cost increase.  
          Local agencies are not be obligated to provide programs or  
          levels of service required by legislation above the level for  
          which funding has been provided. 

          Foster care is one of the programs that has been realigned to  
          the counties. Therefore, if there are any additional costs to  
          counties under the bill, counties would only have to undertake  
          those activities if the state appropriated additional General  
          Fund money to the counties for those purposes. However, given  
          the small workload associated with this bill, it seems unlikely  
          that the counties would request additional funding in order to  
          comply with this bill.