BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                 AB 1090
                                                                 Page  1


         ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
         AB 1090 (Fong)
         As Amended  April 10, 2013
         2/3 vote 

          ELECTIONS           4-2         APPROPRIATIONS      12-5        
          
          ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
         |Ayes:|Fong, Bonta, Hall, Perea  |Ayes:|Gatto, Bocanegra,         |
         |     |                          |     |Bradford,                 |
         |     |                          |     |Ian Calderon, Campos,     |
         |     |                          |     |Eggman, Gomez, Hall,      |
         |     |                          |     |Ammiano, Pan, Quirk,      |
         |     |                          |     |Weber                     |
         |     |                          |     |                          |
         |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
         |Nays:|Donnelly, Logue           |Nays:|Harkey, Bigelow,          |
         |     |                          |     |Donnelly, Linder, Wagner  |
          ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

          SUMMARY  :  Authorizes the Fair Political Practices Commission  
         (FPPC) to bring civil and administrative enforcement actions for  
         violations of Government Code Section 1090 (Section 1090), dealing  
         with conflicts of interest in contracts, and requires the FPPC to  
         provide opinions and advice with respect to Section 1090.   
         Specifically,  this bill  :  

         1)Permits the FPPC to bring a civil or administrative action  
           against any person for a violation of Section 1090.

         2)Prohibits the FPPC from commencing an action against a person  
           for a violation of Section 1090 absent a written authorization  
           from the district attorney of the county in which the violation  
           occurred, or if the Attorney General (AG) or a district attorney  
           is pursuing a criminal action against that person for the same  
           alleged violation.

         3)Permits a person who is subject to Section 1090 to request an  
           opinion or advice from the FPPC with respect to his or her  
           duties under Section 1090.

         4)Requires investigations and enforcement actions brought by the  
           FPPC regarding Section 1090 to be conducted pursuant to  
           procedures that govern FPPC investigations for potential  








                                                                 AB 1090
                                                                 Page  2


           violations of the Political Reform Act of 1974 (PRA).

         5)Prohibits the FPPC from commencing both a civil and an  
           administrative action against a person for a single violation of  
           Section 1090.

         6)Provides that a civil violation of Section 1090 shall be  
           punishable by a fine in an amount not to exceed three times the  
           value of the financial benefit received by the person.  Provides  
           that a violation of Section 1090 is punishable through an  
           administrative action by a monetary penalty of up to $5,000.

         7)Permits the FPPC to obtain a judgment in superior court for the  
           purpose of collecting any unpaid monetary penalties, fees, or  
           civil penalties imposed pursuant to this bill.  Permits the FPPC  
           to apply to the clerk of the superior court for a judgment to  
           collect penalties imposed by an FPPC enforcement order for a  
           violation of Section 1090, in lieu of filing a small claims or  
           civil case with the court to collect those penalties.

          FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
         Committee, any additional costs to the FPPC will be minor and  
         absorbable, and offset to some extent by fine and penalty  
         revenues.

          COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "Government Code Section 1090  
         generally prohibits a public official or employee from making a  
         contract in his or her official capacity in which he or she has a  
         financial interest.  Unlike the conflict of interest rules  
         contained in the PRA, the FPPC does not have a role in enforcing  
         Government Code Section 1090.  Instead, enforcement actions may be  
         brought only by the Attorney General or by the district attorney  
         in the county in which the violation occurred.  Furthermore,  
         unlike the PRA, which can be enforced through criminal, civil, or  
         administrative actions, Government Code Section 1090 can be  
         enforced only through criminal prosecutions.  The existence of  
         multiple conflict of interest laws that are enforced by multiple  
         entities create unnecessary confusion for public officials and  
         hamper efforts to effectively enforce the state's strict conflict  
         of interest rules. AB 1090 improves enforcement of the state's  
         conflict of interest laws by allowing the FPPC to bring civil or  
         administrative enforcement actions in response to violations of  
         the Government Code Section 1090 contracting laws, and gives  
         public officials an additional tool in helping to avoid conflicts  








                                                                 AB 1090
                                                                 Page  3


         of interest by allowing the FPPC to issue advice regarding a  
         public official's obligations under Government Code 1090."

         Section 1090 generally prohibits a public official or employee  
         from making a contract in his or her official capacity in which he  
         or she has a financial interest.  Violation of this provision is  
         punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 or imprisonment in the state  
         prison, and any violator is forever disqualified from holding any  
         office in the state.  

         Notwithstanding the fact that Section 1090 and the PRA's conflict  
         of interest laws are enforced and interpreted by different  
         entities, California courts nonetheless have recognized that the  
         two conflict of interest laws are very similar, and have sought to  
         harmonize the legal interpretations of the two laws to the extent  
         possible (see, e.g., Lexin v. Superior Court (2010) 47 Cal.4th  
         1050, People v. Honig (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 289).  In fact, the  
         California Supreme Court has relied upon regulations adopted by  
         the FPPC under the PRA to assist the court in interpreting the  
         provisions of Section 1090, notwithstanding the fact that the FPPC  
         does not enforce Section 1090 (see Lexin, supra).

         Given the similarity between these two laws, authorizing the FPPC  
         to provide opinions and advice regarding Section 1090, and to  
         bring civil and administrative enforcement actions for violations  
         of Section 1090, may result in greater consistency in the  
         enforcement of these conflict of interest laws and may make it  
         easier for public officials acting in good faith to comply with  
         the conflict of interest laws.  
          
         California voters passed an initiative, Proposition 9, in 1974  
         that created the FPPC and codified significant restrictions and  
         prohibitions on candidates, officeholders and lobbyists.  That  
         initiative is commonly known as the PRA.  Amendments to the PRA  
         that are not submitted to the voters, such as those contained in  
         this bill, must further the purposes of the initiative and require  
         a two-thirds vote of both houses of the Legislature.

         Please see the policy committee analysis for a full discussion of  
         this bill.


          Analysis Prepared by  :    Ethan Jones / E. & R. / (916) 319-2094  
         FN: 0000425








                                                                 AB 1090
                                                                 Page  4