BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 1156
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 24, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                AB 1156 (V. Manuel Pérez) - As Amended:  May 13, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              Local  
          GovernmentVote:7-1

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill excludes improvements on land from the total assessed  
          value of land used to determine the weighted vote of a landowner  
          in the Palo Verde Irrigation District.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          This bill is keyed a state reimbursable mandate.  However, it is  
          unclear if the district is an entity eligible for reimbursement  
          and if a claim would be large enough to meet the minimum set by  
          the Commission on State Mandates.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  .  According to the sponsor, the Palo Verde Irrigation  
            District, given the size and the abundance of sunshine in the  
            geographic location of the district, it has been identified as  
            a preferred location for solar development.  They district  
            contends this bill will ensure that voting power is equally  
            distributed among all land owners, instead of favoring only  
            those who have preferred sites for solar energy development.

           2)Support  .  According to the Association of California Water  
            Agencies, these new solar projects typically utilize a few  
            thousand acres of land but the solar equipment can be worth  
            billions of dollars.  Because of the relatively high value of  
            the improvements compared to the amount of land being used,  
            the landowner of a solar project built under these terms would  
            have a disproportionate share of the district's votes.  This  
            bill would ensure that the votes of irrigated landowners would  
            not be diluted by any potential large solar projects in the  








                                                                  AB 1156
                                                                  Page  2

            district's service area.
                
            3)Background  .  The Palo Verde Irrigation District was  
            established in 1923 and is comprised of mostly farmland  
            occupying about 189 square miles of territory in Riverside and  
            Imperial Counties. PVID is governed by a seven-member board of  
            trustees elected at large among owners of property within the  
            district.  Current law limits voting rights in PVID to  
            landowners and establishes a weighted vote system based on the  
            assessed value of real property, including improvements made  
            by landowners.  

            California's 93 irrigation districts function under a range of  
            statutes that are a hybrid of registered voter and  
            landowner-voter type districts.  In general, registered voters  
            are eligible to vote in district elections, but board members  
            must be landowners of the district.  Historically, the  
            Legislature has recognized landowners' special concerns for  
            irrigation districts' operations by creating unique statutes  
            that preserve the landowner requirement to vote in districts  
            that primarily deliver agricultural water.  Some of these  
            districts have landownership, but not residency requirements.   
            Some districts use weighted votes in their elections, based on  
            the relative value of land under ownership. 
                
            4)There is no registered opposition to this bill.  




           Analysis Prepared by  :    Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081