BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 1174
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 1174 (Bocanegra and Logue)
          As Amended  August 22, 2014
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |76-0 |(January 27,    |SENATE: |36-0 |(August 27,    |
          |           |     |2014)           |        |     |2014)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    B., P. & C.P.  

           SUMMARY  :  Expands the scope of practice for a registered dental  
          assistant in extended functions (RDAEF), registered dental  
          hygienist (RDH), and registered dental hygienist in alternative  
          practice (RDHAP) to better enable the practice of teledentistry  
          in accordance with the findings of a Health Workforce Pilot  
          Program (HWPP), and authorizes Medi-Cal payments for  
          teledentistry services provided to individuals participating in  
          the Medi-Cal program.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Authorizes an RDAEF licensed on or after January 1, 2010, or  
            who completes a course in specified procedures approved by the  
            Dental Board of  California (DBC) and passes the same  
            examination as someone licensed on or after January 1, 2010,  
            and an RDH to perform the following additional duties:

             a)   Determine, following protocols established by the  
               supervising dentist, which radiographs to perform on a  
               patient who has not received an initial examination by the  
               supervising dentist for the specific purpose of the dentist  
               making a diagnosis and treatment plan for the patient; and 

             b)   Place protective restorations, after the diagnosis,  
               treatment plan, and instruction to perform the procedure is  
               provided by a dentist. 

          2)Identifies a protective restoration as an interim therapeutic  
            restorations (ITR), which is defined as a direct provisional  
            restoration placed to stabilize the tooth until a licensed  
            dentist diagnoses the need for further definitive treatment

          3)Authorizes the performance of those duties in a dental office  
            setting or public health setting using telehealth, and  
            pursuant to the order, control, and full professional  








                                                                  AB 1174
                                                                  Page  2

            responsibility of a supervising dentist, as specified. 

          4)Authorizes an RDHAP to perform these additional duties in  
            residences of the homebound, schools, and residential  
            facilities and other institutions, and to place protective  
            restorations only under the general supervision of a dentist. 

          5)Provides that ITRs consist of the removal of soft material  
            from the tooth using only hand instrumentation, without the  
            use of rotary instrumentation, and subsequent placement of an  
            adhesive restorative material, without the use of local  
            anesthesia, after diagnosis and treatment plan by a dentist.

          6)Requires an RDAEF and RDH, in order to perform the functions  
            described above, to complete a program that includes training  
            in performing those functions or to provide evidence  
            satisfactory of having a DBC- or Dental Hygiene Committee of  
            California (DHCC)-approved course in those functions.

          7)Requires DBC and DHCC to adopt, by January 1, 2018,  
            regulations to establish requirements for courses of  
            instruction for these procedures using the competency-based  
            training protocols established by HWPP.

          8)Requires DBC to submit to DHCC proposed regulatory language  
            for approval of courses for instruction for ITRs for purposes  
            of promulgating regulations for RDHs and RDHAPs, and requires  
            DBC to submit any subsequent amendments to those regulations  
            to DHCC.

          9)Requires DHCC to use the curriculum submitted by DBC to adopt  
            regulatory language for approval of courses of instruction for  
            ITRs, and requires any subsequent amendments to those  
            regulations to be agreed on by DBC and DHCC. 

          10)Requires, until January 1, 2018, a program to perform these  
            duties to contain a course that is established at the  
            postsecondary educational level and to have faculty  
            responsible for clinical evaluation complete a course in  
            clinical evaluation or have a faculty appointment at an  
            accredited dental education program.

          11)Deems, until January 1, 2018, an RDAEF or RDH who has  
            completed the prescribed training in the HWPP to have  
            satisfied the requirement for completion of a DBC- or  








                                                                  AB 1174
                                                                  Page  3

            DHC-approved course.

          12)Requires DBC to issue a permit to an RDAEF who files a  
            completed application, including the fee, to provide these  
            duties after it has determined he or she has completed the  
            required coursework. 

          13)For RDHs and RDHAPs, increases to $750 the fee for each  
            review or approval of course requirements for licensure or  
            procedures that require additional training that are not  
            accredited by a DHCC-approved agency.

          14)Until January 1, 2016, requires the Office of Statewide  
            Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) to extend the duration  
            of the HWPP in order to maintain the competence of the  
            clinicians trained during the course of the project, and to  
            authorize training of additional clinicians in the duties  
            specified in the HWPP.  

          15)Provides that, to the extent federal financial participation  
            (FFP) is available, face-to-face contact between a health care  
            provider and a patient is not required under the Medi-Cal  
            program for teledentistry by store and forward.  

          16)Defines "teledentistry by store and forward" as an  
            asynchronous transmission of dental information to be reviewed  
            at a later time by a dentist at a distant site who reviews the  
            dental information without the patient being present in real  
            time.

          17)Provides that it is not unprofessional conduct for a dentist  
            to require or permit, prior to any examination of the patient,  
            an RDAEF, RDH, or RDHAP to determine and perform radiographs  
            for the specific purpose of aiding a dentist in completing a  
            comprehensive diagnosis and treatment plan for a patient using  
            telehealth, as defined, under these provisions.  

          18)Provides that a dentist is not required to review patient  
            records or make a diagnosis using telehealth. 

          19)Makes it the responsibility of the authorizing dentist, if  
            dental treatment is provided to a patient pursuant to the  
            diagnosis and treatment plan authorized by a supervising  
            dentist at a location other than the dentist's practice  
            location, that the patient, or the patient's representative,  








                                                                  AB 1174
                                                                  Page  4

            receive written notification that the care was provided at the  
            direction of the authorizing dentist and that includes the  
            authorizing dentist's name, practice location address, and  
            telephone number, except as specified. 

          20)Prohibits a dentist from concurrently supervising more than a  
            total of five RDAEFs, RDHs, or RDHAPs under these provisions.   

           The Senate amendments  : 

          1)Delete provisions that authorized a registered dental  
            assistant (RDA) to determine which radiographs to perform if  
            he or she completed a DBC-approved educational program in  
            those duties.

          2)Delete provisions that require an RDHAP to complete specified  
            coursework in order to determine which radiographs to perform  
            or place protective restorations. 

          3)Delete provisions that define the following terms:  "clinical  
            instruction," "course," "didactic instruction," "interim  
            therapeutic restoration," "laboratory instruction,"  
            "preclinical instruction," and "program."

          4)Delete the requirement that a program or course required to  
            choose radiographs to contain specified instructional  
            components, including didactic and clinical instruction,  
            laboratory instruction, and examinations.

          5)Require DBC and DHCC to promulgate, by January 1, 2018,  
            regulations to establish requirements for courses of  
            instruction for the additional procedures using the  
            competency-based training protocols established by the HWPP.

          6)Require DBC to submit to DHCC proposed regulatory language for  
            approval of courses for instruction for ITRs for purposes of  
            promulgating regulations for RDHs and RDHAPs, and requires DBC  
            to submit any subsequent amendments to those regulations to  
            DHCC.

          7)Requires DHCC to use the curriculum submitted by DBC to adopt  
            regulatory language for approval of courses of instruction for  
            ITRs, and requires any subsequent amendments to those  
            regulations to be agreed on by DBC and DHCC.









                                                                  AB 1174
                                                                  Page  5

          8)Require DBC to issue a permit to an RDAEF who files a  
            completed application, including the fee, to provide these  
            duties after it has determined he or she has completed the  
            required coursework. 

          9)For RDHs and RDHAPs, increases to $750 the fee for each review  
            or approval of course requirements for licensure or procedures  
            that require additional training that are not accredited by a  
            DHCC-approved agency.

          10)Until January 1, 2016, require OSHPD to extend the duration  
            of the HWPP in order to maintain the competence of the  
            clinicians trained during the course of the project, and to  
            authorize training of additional clinicians in the duties  
            specified in the HWPP.  

          11)Provides that it is not unprofessional conduct for a dentist  
            to require or permit, prior to any examination of the patient,  
            an RDAEF, RDH, or RDHAP to determine and perform radiographs  
            for the specific purpose of aiding a dentist in completing a  
            comprehensive diagnosis and treatment plan for a patient using  
            telehealth, as defined, under these provisions.  

          12)Provides that a dentist is not required to review patient  
            records or make a diagnosis using telehealth.

          13)Make it the responsibility of the authorizing dentist, if  
            dental treatment is provided to a patient pursuant to the  
            diagnosis and treatment plan authorized by a supervising  
            dentist at a location other than the dentist's practice  
            location, that the patient, or the patient's representative,  
            receive written notification that the care was provided at the  
            direction of the authorizing dentist and that includes the  
            authorizing dentist's name, practice location address, and  
            telephone number, except as specified. 

          14)Prohibit a dentist from concurrently supervising more than a  
            total of five RDAEFs, RDHs, or RDHAPs under these provisions.  
           
          15)Make conforming changes. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee:

          1)One-time costs of about $50,000 for the development of  








                                                                  AB 1174
                                                                  Page  6

            regulations and information technology upgrades and ongoing  
            costs of $200,000 per year for licensing and enforcement by  
            the Dental Board of California (State Dentistry Fund).

          2)One-time costs of about $50,000 for the development of  
            regulations and information technology upgrades and ongoing  
            costs of $80,000 per year for licensing by the Dental Hygiene  
            Committee of California (State Dental Hygiene Fund).

          3)Minor costs to continue the operation of Health Workforce  
            Pilot Project #172 (private funds).

          4)Unknown impact on Medi-Cal costs for dental procedures  
            (General Fund and federal funds).  Under current practice, the  
            Medi-Cal program does not provide reimbursement for dental  
            services provided through telehealth.  By specifically  
            authorizing such reimbursement and making changes to scope of  
            practice laws that will increase the potential use of  
            telehealth, this bill will likely increase utilization to some  
            degree.  The size of that impact is unknown. 

          The Department has indicated that the cost of setting up the  
            required information technology systems to facilitate dental  
            telehealth will limit implementation. This may be particularly  
            significant for the Denti-Cal program, in which reimbursement  
            rates are generally low. On the other hand, utilization rates  
            in the Denti-Cal program are very low (in 2011, only 27% of  
            eligible children received dental care). Therefore, there is  
            significant scope for increasing utilization of services in  
            the Denti-Cal program. 

          Finally, it may be the case that more early intervention will  
            reduce long-run costs to provide dental care in the Medi-Cal  
            program. 

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)Purpose of this bill.  This bill expands the scope of practice  
            for RDAEFs, RDHs, and RDHAPs to better enable the practice of  
            teledentistry and fully realize the concept of the Virtual  
            Dental Home (VDH), consistent with the findings of a  
            successful pilot program, and enables reimbursement by  
            Medi-Cal for VDH treatment.  This bill is author sponsored.

          2)Author's statement.  According to the author, "A three year  








                                                                  AB 1174
                                                                  Page  7

            demonstration, directed by the Pacific Center for Special Care  
            at the University of the Pacific School of Dentistry, has  
            established the ability of the VDH system to reach underserved  
            children in Head Start centers and schools, people with  
            disabilities in residential care facilities, seniors in  
            nursing homes, and others who do not access dental care in the  
            traditional office and clinic-based delivery system.

          "AB 1174 expands the existing VDH system, as authorized through  
            a HWPP under the Office of Statewide Health Planning and  
            Development (OSHPD), and allows these systems to be used  
            statewide.

          "This bill incorporates the prevention and early intervention  
            duties authorized by the HWPP into the scope of practice of  
            allied dental personnel.  It will also create parity between  
            telehealth-facilitated diagnostic and preventive dental  
            services and traditional in-person services by allowing  
            telehealth-enabled teams to be able to bill the Medi-Cal  
            program for providing dental care to enrolled individuals."

          3)OSHPD pilot project.  OSHPD was created in 1978 to provide  
            California with an enhanced understanding of the structure and  
            function of its healthcare delivery systems.  OSHPD considers  
            itself the leader in collecting data and disseminating  
            information about California's healthcare infrastructure,  
            promoting an equitably distributed healthcare workforce and  
            publishing valuable information about healthcare outcomes.

          The HWPP within OSHPD allows organizations to test, demonstrate,  
            and evaluate new or expanded roles for healthcare  
            professionals, or new healthcare delivery alternatives before  
            changes in licensing laws are made by the Legislature.  An  
            OSHPD pilot project is authorized to waive laws that would  
            otherwise bar clinicians from learning and performing  
            procedures outside their current scope of practice.  Upon  
            approval, OSHPD conducts periodic site visits and continuous  
            evaluations of the pilot project based on specified criteria. 

          In 2010, the Pacific Center for Special Care at the University  
            of the Pacific, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry applied  
            for and was approved to conduct a pilot project, HWPP 172, to  
            teach new skills to health care personnel and improve the oral  
            health of underserved populations by expanding duties of RDAs,  
            RDAEF, and RDHs working in VDHs.  The goal of HWPP 172 was to  








                                                                  AB 1174
                                                                  Page  8

            demonstrate that RDAs, RDAEFs, and RDHs can keep people  
            healthy in community settings by providing education,  
            preventive care, interim therapeutic restorations triage, and  
            case management.  Where more complex dental treatment is  
            needed, the VDH connects patients with dentists in the area.   
            Since January 2011, 1,514 patients have been seen under HWPP  
            172, 1,514 radiographic decisions were made and 324 ITRs were  
            placed by RDAs, RDAEFs, and RDHs with no adverse outcomes.   
            The project has been extended through November 30, 2014. 
           
           4)Virtual Dental Homes.  VDHs create a community-based oral  
            health delivery system in which people receive preventive and  
            basic therapeutic services in community settings where they  
            live or receive educational, social or general health  
            services.  It utilizes technology to link practitioners in the  
            community with dentists at remote office sites.

          Equipped with portable imaging equipment and an Internet-based  
            dental record system, the RDA, RDAEF, or RDH collects  
            electronic dental records such as X-rays, photographs, charts  
            of dental findings, and dental and medical histories, and  
            uploads the information to a secure Web site where they are  
            reviewed by a collaborating dentist.  The dentist reviews the  
            patient's information and creates a tentative dental treatment  
            plan.  The RDA, RDAEF, or RDH then carries out the aspects of  
            the treatment plan that can be conducted in the community  
            setting. These services include:  a) health promotion and  
            prevention education; b) dental disease risk assessment; c)  
            preventive procedures such as application of fluoride varnish,  
            dental sealants and, for dental hygienists, dental prophylaxis  
            and periodontal scaling; d) placing carious teeth in a holding  
            pattern using ITRs to stabilize patients until they can be  
            seen by a dentist for definitive care; and, e) tracking and  
            supporting the individual's need for and compliance with  
            recommendations for additional and follow-up dental services. 

          The RDA, RDAEF, or RDH refers patients to dental offices for  
            procedures that require the skills of a dentist.  When such  
            visits occur, the patient arrives with a diagnosis and  
            treatment plan already determined, preventive practices in  
            place and preventive procedures having been performed.   
            Presumably, the patient is more likely to receive a successful  
            first visit with the dentist as the patient's dental records  
            and images have already been reviewed.  All of this adds up to  
            a more successful dentist visit.  In some cases the dentist  








                                                                  AB 1174
                                                                  Page  9

            may come to the community site and use portable equipment to  
            provide restorations or other services that only a dentist can  
            provide.  In either case, the majority of patient interactions  
            and efforts to keep people healthy are performed by the RDA,  
            RDAEF, or RDH in the community setting.

          5)Medi-Cal.  The VDH treatment model is not reimbursable by  
            Medi-Cal because existing law requires face-to-face contact  
            between a health care provider and a patient.  This bill would  
            delete that provision and allow practitioners to receive  
            payment for these services.  This bill also provides patient  
            protections by ensuring contact with the remote dentist upon  
            request.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Eunie Linden / B., P. & C.P. / (916)  
          319-3301                                                    


                                                               FN: 0005518