Amended in Assembly March 21, 2013

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 1179


Introduced by Assembly Member Bocanegra

February 22, 2013


An act to amend Section 65080 of the Government Code, and to amend Section 75121 of the Public Resources Code, relating to planning.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1179, as amended, Bocanegra. Regional transportation plan: sustainable communities strategy: schoolsites.

Existing law requires certain transportation planning activities by designated regional transportation planning agencies, including development of a regional transportation plan. Certain of these agencies are designated by federal law as metropolitan planning organizations. Existing law requires metropolitan planning organizations to adopt a sustainable communities strategy, subject to specified requirements, as part of a regional transportation plan, which is to be designed to achieve certain targets established by the State Air Resources Board for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and light trucks in the region.

This bill would additionally require the sustainable communities strategy to identify, in consultation with each local educational agency in the region,begin delete future school facilities sites, or existing facilities that may be modernized or expandedend deletebegin insert how the sustainable communities strategy may impact school enrollments and capacities and the need for new schoolsites or expansion or modernization of existing schoolsitesend insert, as specified. By imposing additional requirements on local agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Existing law creates the Strategic Growth Council, consisting of specified state officers and a public member appointed by the Governor, with specified duties relating to coordination of actions of state agencies relative to improvement of air and water quality, natural resource protection, transportation, and various other matters.

This bill would add the Superintendent of Public Instruction or his or her designee to the Strategic Growth Council.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 65080 of the Government Code is
2amended to read:

3

65080.  

(a) Each transportation planning agency designated
4under Section 29532 or 29532.1 shall prepare and adopt a regional
5transportation plan directed at achieving a coordinated and balanced
6regional transportation system, including, but not limited to, mass
7transportation, highway, railroad, maritime, bicycle, pedestrian,
8goods movement, and aviation facilities and services. The plan
9shall be action-oriented and pragmatic, considering both the
10short-term and long-term future, and shall present clear, concise
11policy guidance to local and state officials. The regional
12transportation plan shall consider factors specified in Section 134
13of Title 23 of the United States Code. Each transportation planning
14agency shall consider and incorporate, as appropriate, the
15transportation plans of cities, counties, districts, private
16organizations, and state and federal agencies.

17(b) The regional transportation plan shall be an internally
18consistent document and shall include all of the following:

19(1) A policy element that describes the transportation issues in
20the region, identifies and quantifies regional needs, and describes
21the desired short-range and long-range transportation goals, and
P3    1pragmatic objective and policy statements. The objective and policy
2statements shall be consistent with the funding estimates of the
3financial element. The policy element of transportation planning
4agencies with populations that exceed 200,000 persons may
5quantify a set of indicators including, but not limited to, all of the
6following:

7(A) Measures of mobility and traffic congestion, including, but
8not limited to, daily vehicle hours of delay per capita and vehicle
9miles traveled per capita.

10(B) Measures of road and bridge maintenance and rehabilitation
11needs, including, but not limited to, roadway pavement and bridge
12conditions.

13(C) Measures of means of travel, including, but not limited to,
14percentage share of all trips (work and nonwork) made by all of
15the following:

16(i) Single occupant vehicle.

17(ii) Multiple occupant vehicle or carpool.

18(iii) Public transit including commuter rail and intercity rail.

19(iv) Walking.

20(v) Bicycling.

21(D) Measures of safety and security, including, but not limited
22to, total injuries and fatalities assigned to each of the modes set
23forth in subparagraph (C).

24(E) Measures of equity and accessibility, including, but not
25limited to, percentage of the population served by frequent and
26reliable public transit, with a breakdown by income bracket, and
27percentage of all jobs accessible by frequent and reliable public
28transit service, with a breakdown by income bracket.

29(F) The requirements of this section may be met utilizing
30existing sources of information. No additional traffic counts,
31household surveys, or other sources of data shall be required.

32(2) A sustainable communities strategy prepared by each
33metropolitan planning organization as follows:

34(A) No later than September 30, 2010, the State Air Resources
35Board shall provide each affected region with greenhouse gas
36emission reduction targets for the automobile and light truck sector
37for 2020 and 2035, respectively.

38(i) No later than January 31, 2009, the state board shall appoint
39a Regional Targets Advisory Committee to recommend factors to
40be considered and methodologies to be used for setting greenhouse
P4    1gas emission reduction targets for the affected regions. The
2committee shall be composed of representatives of the metropolitan
3planning organizations, affected air districts, the League of
4California Cities, the California State Association of Counties,
5local transportation agencies, and members of the public, including
6homebuilders, environmental organizations, planning organizations,
7environmental justice organizations, affordable housing
8organizations, and others. The advisory committee shall transmit
9a report with its recommendations to the state board no later than
10September 30, 2009. In recommending factors to be considered
11and methodologies to be used, the advisory committee may
12consider any relevant issues, including, but not limited to, data
13needs, modeling techniques, growth forecasts, the impacts of
14regional jobs-housing balance on interregional travel and
15greenhouse gas emissions, economic and demographic trends, the
16magnitude of greenhouse gas reduction benefits from a variety of
17land use and transportation strategies, and appropriate methods to
18describe regional targets and to monitor performance in attaining
19those targets. The state board shall consider the report prior to
20setting the targets.

21(ii) Prior to setting the targets for a region, the state board shall
22exchange technical information with the metropolitan planning
23organization and the affected air district. The metropolitan planning
24organization may recommend a target for the region. The
25metropolitan planning organization shall hold at least one public
26workshop within the region after receipt of the report from the
27advisory committee. The state board shall release draft targets for
28each region no later than June 30, 2010.

29(iii) In establishing these targets, the state board shall take into
30account greenhouse gas emission reductions that will be achieved
31by improved vehicle emission standards, changes in fuel
32composition, and other measures it has approved that will reduce
33greenhouse gas emissions in the affected regions, and prospective
34measures the state board plans to adopt to reduce greenhouse gas
35emissions from other greenhouse gas emission sources as that term
36is defined in subdivision (i) of Section 38505 of the Health and
37Safety Code and consistent with the regulations promulgated
38pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006
39(Division 25.5 (commencing with Section 38500) of the Health
40and Safety Code).

P5    1(iv) The state board shall update the regional greenhouse gas
2emission reduction targets every eight years consistent with each
3metropolitan planning organization’s timeframe for updating its
4regional transportation plan under federal law until 2050. The state
5board may revise the targets every four years based on changes in
6the factors considered under clause (iii). The state board shall
7exchange technical information with the Department of
8Transportation, metropolitan planning organizations, local
9governments, and affected air districts and engage in a consultative
10process with public and private stakeholders prior to updating these
11targets.

12(v) The greenhouse gas emission reduction targets may be
13expressed in gross tons, tons per capita, tons per household, or in
14any other metric deemed appropriate by the state board.

15(B) Each metropolitan planning organization shall prepare a
16sustainable communities strategy, subject to the requirements of
17Part 450 of Title 23 of, and Part 93 of Title 40 of, the Code of
18Federal Regulations, including the requirement to utilize the most
19recent planning assumptions considering local general plans and
20other factors. The sustainable communities strategy shall (i)
21identify the general location of uses, residential densities, and
22building intensities within the region, (ii) identify areas within the
23region sufficient to house all the population of the region, including
24all economic segments of the population, over the course of the
25planning period of the regional transportation plan taking into
26account net migration into the region, population growth, household
27formation and employment growth, (iii) identify areas within the
28region sufficient to house an eight-year projection of the regional
29housing need for the region pursuant to Section 65584, (iv) identify
30a transportation network to service the transportation needs of the
31region, (v) gather and consider the best practically available
32scientific information regarding resource areas and farmland in
33the region as defined in subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section
3465080.01, (vi) consider the state housing goals specified in Sections
3565580 and 65581, (vii) identify, in consultation with each local
36educational agency, as defined in Section 421 of the Education
37Code, in the region,begin delete future school facilities sites, with an emphasis
38on sites that enable pupils to walk to school and have the potential
39for joint use of the school facilities by the community, or existing
40school facilities for modernization or expansion if the area served
P6    1by an existing school facility has been identified for infill or related
2developmentend delete
begin insert how the sustainable communities strategy may impact
3school enrollments and capacities and the need for new schoolsites,
4and how the sustainable communities strategy may impact school
5capacities in the areas targeted for infill development and the need
6for expansion or modernization of existing schoolsitesend insert
, (viii) set
7forth a forecasted development pattern for the region, which, when
8integrated with the transportation network, and other transportation
9measures and policies, will reduce the greenhouse gas emissions
10from automobiles and light trucks to achieve, if there is a feasible
11way to do so, the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets
12approved by the state board, and (ix) allow the regional
13transportation plan to comply with Section 176 of the federal Clean
14Air Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 7506).

15(C) (i) Within the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan
16Transportation Commission, as defined by Section 66502, the
17Association of Bay Area Governments shall be responsible for
18clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (v), (vi) and (vii) of subparagraph (B), the
19Metropolitan Transportation Commission shall be responsible for
20clauses (iv) and (ix) of subparagraph (B); and the Association of
21Bay Area Governments and the Metropolitan Transportation
22Commission shall jointly be responsible for clause (viii) of
23subparagraph (B).

24(ii) Within the jurisdiction of the Tahoe Regional Planning
25Agency, as defined in Sections 66800 and 66801, the Tahoe
26Metropolitan Planning Organization shall use the Regional Plan
27for the Lake Tahoe Region as the sustainable community strategy,
28provided that it complies with clauses (viii) and (ix) of
29subparagraph (B).

30(D) In the region served by the multicounty transportation
31planning agency described in Section 130004 of the Public Utilities
32Code, a subregional council of governments and the county
33transportation commission may work together to propose the
34sustainable communities strategy and an alternative planning
35strategy, if one is prepared pursuant to subparagraph (I), for that
36subregional area. The metropolitan planning organization may
37adopt a framework for a subregional sustainable communities
38strategy or a subregional alternative planning strategy to address
39the intraregional land use, transportation, economic, air quality,
40and climate policy relationships. The metropolitan planning
P7    1organization shall include the subregional sustainable communities
2strategy for that subregion in the regional sustainable communities
3strategy to the extent consistent with this section and federal law
4and approve the subregional alternative planning strategy, if one
5is prepared pursuant to subparagraph (I), for that subregional area
6to the extent consistent with this section. The metropolitan planning
7organization shall develop overall guidelines, create public
8participation plans pursuant to subparagraph (F), ensure
9coordination, resolve conflicts, make sure that the overall plan
10complies with applicable legal requirements, and adopt the plan
11for the region.

12(E) The metropolitan planning organization shall conduct at
13least two informational meetings in each county within the region
14for members of the board of supervisors and city councils on the
15sustainable communities strategy and alternative planning strategy,
16if any. The metropolitan planning organization may conduct only
17one informational meeting if it is attended by representatives of
18the county board of supervisors and city council members
19representing a majority of the cities representing a majority of the
20population in the incorporated areas of that county. Notice of the
21meeting or meetings shall be sent to the clerk of the board of
22 supervisors and to each city clerk. The purpose of the meeting or
23meetings shall be to discuss the sustainable communities strategy
24and the alternative planning strategy, if any, including the key land
25use and planning assumptions to the members of the board of
26supervisors and the city council members in that county and to
27solicit and consider their input and recommendations.

28(F) Each metropolitan planning organization shall adopt a public
29participation plan, for development of the sustainable communities
30strategy and an alternative planning strategy, if any, that includes
31all of the following:

32(i) Outreach efforts to encourage the active participation of a
33broad range of stakeholder groups in the planning process,
34consistent with the agency’s adopted Federal Public Participation
35Plan, including, but not limited to, affordable housing advocates,
36transportation advocates, neighborhood and community groups,
37environmental advocates, home builder representatives,
38broad-based business organizations, landowners, commercial
39property interests, and homeowner associations.

P8    1(ii) Consultation with congestion management agencies,
2transportation agencies, and transportation commissions.

3(iii) Workshops throughout the region to provide the public with
4the information and tools necessary to provide a clear
5understanding of the issues and policy choices. At least one
6workshop shall be held in each county in the region. For counties
7with a population greater than 500,000, at least three workshops
8shall be held. Each workshop, to the extent practicable, shall
9include urban simulation computer modeling to create visual
10representations of the sustainable communities strategy and the
11alternative planning strategy.

12(iv) Preparation and circulation of a draft sustainable
13communities strategy and an alternative planning strategy, if one
14is prepared, not less than 55 days before adoption of a final regional
15transportation plan.

16(v) At least three public hearings on the draft sustainable
17communities strategy in the regional transportation plan and
18alternative planning strategy, if one is prepared. If the metropolitan
19transportation organization consists of a single county, at least two
20public hearings shall be held. To the maximum extent feasible, the
21hearings shall be in different parts of the region to maximize the
22opportunity for participation by members of the public throughout
23the region.

24(vi) A process for enabling members of the public to provide a
25single request to receive notices, information, and updates.

26(G) In preparing a sustainable communities strategy, the
27metropolitan planning organization shall consider spheres of
28influence that have been adopted by the local agency formation
29commissions within its region.

30(H) Prior to adopting a sustainable communities strategy, the
31metropolitan planning organization shall quantify the reduction in
32greenhouse gas emissions projected to be achieved by the
33sustainable communities strategy and set forth the difference, if
34any, between the amount of that reduction and the target for the
35region established by the state board.

36(I) If the sustainable communities strategy, prepared in
37compliance with subparagraph (B) or (D), is unable to reduce
38greenhouse gas emissions to achieve the greenhouse gas emission
39reduction targets established by the state board, the metropolitan
40planning organization shall prepare an alternative planning strategy
P9    1to the sustainable communities strategy showing how those
2greenhouse gas emission targets would be achieved through
3alternative development patterns, infrastructure, or additional
4transportation measures or policies. The alternative planning
5strategy shall be a separate document from the regional
6transportation plan, but it may be adopted concurrently with the
7regional transportation plan. In preparing the alternative planning
8strategy, the metropolitan planning organization:

9(i) Shall identify the principal impediments to achieving the
10targets within the sustainable communities strategy.

11(ii) May include an alternative development pattern for the
12region pursuant to subparagraphs (B) to (G), inclusive.

13(iii) Shall describe how the greenhouse gas emission reduction
14targets would be achieved by the alternative planning strategy, and
15why the development pattern, measures, and policies in the
16alternative planning strategy are the most practicable choices for
17achievement of the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets.

18(iv) An alternative development pattern set forth in the
19alternative planning strategy shall comply with Part 450 of Title
2023 of, and Part 93 of Title 40 of, the Code of Federal Regulations,
21except to the extent that compliance will prevent achievement of
22the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets approved by the
23state board.

24(v) For purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act
25(Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public
26Resources Code), an alternative planning strategy shall not
27constitute a land use plan, policy, or regulation, and the
28inconsistency of a project with an alternative planning strategy
29shall not be a consideration in determining whether a project may
30have an environmental effect.

31(J) (i) Prior to starting the public participation process adopted
32pursuant to subparagraph (F), the metropolitan planning
33organization shall submit a description to the state board of the
34technical methodology it intends to use to estimate the greenhouse
35gas emissions from its sustainable communities strategy and, if
36appropriate, its alternative planning strategy. The state board shall
37respond to the metropolitan planning organization in a timely
38manner with written comments about the technical methodology,
39including specifically describing any aspects of that methodology
40it concludes will not yield accurate estimates of greenhouse gas
P10   1emissions, and suggested remedies. The metropolitan planning
2organization is encouraged to work with the state board until the
3state board concludes that the technical methodology operates
4accurately.

5(ii) After adoption, a metropolitan planning organization shall
6submit a sustainable communities strategy or an alternative
7planning strategy, if one has been adopted, to the state board for
8review, including the quantification of the greenhouse gas emission
9reductions the strategy would achieve and a description of the
10technical methodology used to obtain that result. Review by the
11state board shall be limited to acceptance or rejection of the
12metropolitan planning organization’s determination that the strategy
13submitted would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas
14emission reduction targets established by the state board. The state
15board shall complete its review within 60 days.

16(iii) If the state board determines that the strategy submitted
17would not, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas emission
18reduction targets, the metropolitan planning organization shall
19revise its strategy or adopt an alternative planning strategy, if not
20previously adopted, and submit the strategy for review pursuant
21to clause (ii). At a minimum, the metropolitan planning
22organization must obtain state board acceptance that an alternative
23planning strategy would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse
24gas emission reduction targets established for that region by the
25state board.

26(K) Neither a sustainable communities strategy nor an alternative
27planning strategy regulates the use of land, nor, except as provided
28by subparagraph (J), shall either one be subject to any state
29approval. Nothing in a sustainable communities strategy shall be
30interpreted as superseding the exercise of the land use authority
31of cities and counties within the region. Nothing in this section
32shall be interpreted to limit the state board’s authority under any
33other provision of law. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted
34to authorize the abrogation of any vested right whether created by
35statute or by common law. Nothing in this section shall require a
36city’s or county’s land use policies and regulations, including its
37general plan, to be consistent with the regional transportation plan
38or an alternative planning strategy. Nothing in this section requires
39a metropolitan planning organization to approve a sustainable
40communities strategy that would be inconsistent with Part 450 of
P11   1Title 23 of, or Part 93 of Title 40 of, the Code of Federal
2Regulations and any administrative guidance under those
3regulations. Nothing in this section relieves a public or private
4entity or any person from compliance with any other local, state,
5or federal law.

6(L) Nothing in this section requires projects programmed for
7funding on or before December 31, 2011, to be subject to the
8provisions of this paragraph if they (i) are contained in the 2007
9or 2009 Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program,
10(ii) are funded pursuant to Chapter 12.49 (commencing with
11Section 8879.20) of Division 1 of Title 2, or (iii) were specifically
12listed in a ballot measure prior to December 31, 2008, approving
13a sales tax increase for transportation projects. Nothing in this
14section shall require a transportation sales tax authority to change
15the funding allocations approved by the voters for categories of
16transportation projects in a sales tax measure adopted prior to
17December 31, 2010. For purposes of this subparagraph, a
18transportation sales tax authority is a district, as defined in Section
197252 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, that is authorized to
20impose a sales tax for transportation purposes.

21(M) A metropolitan planning organization, or a regional
22transportation planning agency not within a metropolitan planning
23organization, that is required to adopt a regional transportation
24plan not less than every five years, may elect to adopt the plan not
25less than every four years. This election shall be made by the board
26of directors of the metropolitan planning organization or regional
27transportation planning agency no later than June 1, 2009, or
28thereafter 54 months prior to the statutory deadline for the adoption
29of housing elements for the local jurisdictions within the region,
30after a public hearing at which comments are accepted from
31members of the public and representatives of cities and counties
32within the region covered by the metropolitan planning
33organization or regional transportation planning agency. Notice
34of the public hearing shall be given to the general public and by
35mail to cities and counties within the region no later than 30 days
36prior to the date of the public hearing. Notice of election shall be
37promptly given to the Department of Housing and Community
38Development. The metropolitan planning organization or the
39regional transportation planning agency shall complete its next
P12   1regional transportation plan within three years of the notice of
2 election.

3(N) Two or more of the metropolitan planning organizations
4for Fresno County, Kern County, Kings County, Madera County,
5Merced County, San Joaquin County, Stanislaus County, and
6Tulare County may work together to develop and adopt
7multiregional goals and policies that may address interregional
8land use, transportation, economic, air quality, and climate
9relationships. The participating metropolitan planning organizations
10may also develop a multiregional sustainable communities strategy,
11to the extent consistent with federal law, or an alternative planning
12strategy for adoption by the metropolitan planning organizations.
13Each participating metropolitan planning organization shall
14consider any adopted multiregional goals and policies in the
15development of a sustainable communities strategy and, if
16applicable, an alternative planning strategy for its region.

17(3) An action element that describes the programs and actions
18necessary to implement the plan and assigns implementation
19responsibilities. The action element may describe all transportation
20projects proposed for development during the 20-year or greater
21life of the plan. The action element shall consider congestion
22management programming activities carried out within the region.

23(4) (A) A financial element that summarizes the cost of plan
24implementation constrained by a realistic projection of available
25revenues. The financial element shall also contain
26recommendations for allocation of funds. A county transportation
27commission created pursuant to Section 130000 of the Public
28Utilities Code shall be responsible for recommending projects to
29be funded with regional improvement funds, if the project is
30consistent with the regional transportation plan. The first five years
31of the financial element shall be based on the five-year estimate
32of funds developed pursuant to Section 14524. The financial
33element may recommend the development of specified new sources
34of revenue, consistent with the policy element and action element.

35(B) The financial element of transportation planning agencies
36with populations that exceed 200,000 persons may include a project
37cost breakdown for all projects proposed for development during
38the 20-year life of the plan that includes total expenditures and
39related percentages of total expenditures for all of the following:

40(i) State highway expansion.

P13   1(ii) State highway rehabilitation, maintenance, and operations.

2(iii) Local road and street expansion.

3(iv) Local road and street rehabilitation, maintenance, and
4operation.

5(v) Mass transit, commuter rail, and intercity rail expansion.

6(vi) Mass transit, commuter rail, and intercity rail rehabilitation,
7maintenance, and operations.

8(vii) Pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

9(viii) Environmental enhancements and mitigation.

10(ix) Research and planning.

11(x) Other categories.

12(C) The metropolitan planning organization or county
13transportation agency, whichever entity is appropriate, shall
14consider financial incentives for cities and counties that have
15resource areas or farmland, as defined in Section 65080.01, for
16the purposes of, for example, transportation investments for the
17preservation and safety of the city street or county road system
18and farm-to-market and interconnectivity transportation needs.
19The metropolitan planning organization or county transportation
20agency, whichever entity is appropriate, shall also consider
21financial assistance for counties to address countywide service
22responsibilities in counties that contribute toward the greenhouse
23gas emission reduction targets by implementing policies for growth
24to occur within their cities.

25(c) Each transportation planning agency may also include other
26factors of local significance as an element of the regional
27transportation plan, including, but not limited to, issues of mobility
28for specific sectors of the community, including, but not limited
29to, senior citizens.

30(d) Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, each
31 transportation planning agency shall adopt and submit, every four
32years, an updated regional transportation plan to the California
33Transportation Commission and the Department of Transportation.
34A transportation planning agency located in a federally designated
35air quality attainment area or that does not contain an urbanized
36area may at its option adopt and submit a regional transportation
37plan every five years. When applicable, the plan shall be consistent
38with federal planning and programming requirements and shall
39conform to the regional transportation plan guidelines adopted by
40the California Transportation Commission. Prior to adoption of
P14   1the regional transportation plan, a public hearing shall be held after
2the giving of notice of the hearing by publication in the affected
3county or counties pursuant to Section 6061.

4

SEC. 2.  

Section 75121 of the Public Resources Code is
5amended to read:

6

75121.  

(a) The Strategic Growth Council is hereby established
7in state government and it shall consist of the Director of State
8Planning and Research, the Secretary of the Resources Agency,
9the Secretary for Environmental Protection, the Secretary of the
10Transportation Agency, the Secretary of California Health and
11Human Services, the Superintendent of Public Instruction or his
12or her designee, and one member of the public to be appointed by
13the Governor. The public member shall have a background in land
14use planning, local government, resource protection and
15management, or community development or revitalization.

16(b) Staff for the council shall be reflective of the council’s
17membership.

18

SEC. 3.  

If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
19this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
20local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
21pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
224 of Title 2 of the Government Code.



O

    98