BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1199
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 8, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                      AB 1199 (Fong) - As Amended:  May 1, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              Higher  
          EducationVote:10-1

          Urgency:     Yes                  State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the Board of Governors (BOG) of the  
          California Community Colleges (CCC) to adopt an enrollment  
          stabilization funding formula for CCC districts under  
          accreditation sanction and, as a result, experiencing decreased  
          student enrollment, provided certain conditions are met by the  
          district. Specifically, this bill:

          1)Requires the BOG to adopt the formula for determining  
            adjustments to district's fiscal-year revenue levels if all of  
            the following conditions are met:

             a)   The district or campus of the district is subject to a  
               probation or a "show cause" accreditation sanction.

             b)   The district has identified a new funding source  
               sufficient for the full payment of any fund liability in  
               equal installments over the next two years.

             c)   The district develops an improvement plan certified by  
               the CCC Chancellor that:

               i)     Includes a six-month accreditation compliance report  
                 from the district's board of trustees signed by the  
                 district chancellor and passed by the district's board of  
                 trustees.

               ii)    Details the district's to-date progress and includes  
                 a timetable to complete a full and satisfactory  
                 accreditation response.









                                                                  AB 1199
                                                                  Page  2

          2)Requires the stabilization formula per (1) to provide the  
            following adjustments in district revenues for a qualifying  
            district experiencing decreases in full-time equivalent  
            students (FTES): 

             a)   Decreases in FTES shall result in revenue reductions  
               beginning in the year following the initial year in which  
               the district qualifies for this stabilization funding.

             b)   Revenue reductions in the second and third years after  
               the district qualifies for the stabilization funding shall  
               include payments by the district of equal installments in  
               each of these years to cover the difference between the  
               stabilization funding the district would have received  
               pursuant to existing law and what the district did receive  
               pursuant to (2)(a).

           

          FISCAL EFFECT  

          Of the two districts current under show cause sanction (see  
          below), only the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) has a new  
          funding source that could be applicable to this bill. Last  
          November, San Francisco approved a parcel tax to raise $16  
          million per year for CCSF. The district's governing board is  
          planning to use most of this revenue to increase its operating  
          reserve and address other deficiencies noted by the accrediting  
          body. 

          The CCC Chancellor's Office estimates that, based on current  
          enrollment estimates, the stabilization formula would result in  
          an additional allocation within Prop. 98 funds of $5.4 million  
          to CCSF for 2012-13, which would be repayed by the district over  
          the following two fiscal years.

          It is not clear from the bill what constitutes a new funding  
          source, nor is it clear whether a district under show cause with  
          a new local funding available would be eligible for or required  
          to seek the additional stabilization funding. The bill requires  
          a district's improvement plan to be certified by the CCC  
          Chancellor, which implies that a district meeting the qualifying  
          conditions could decide to seek certification by submitting the  
          required documents to the Chancellor's Office. The Chancellor's  
          Office would incur additional staffing costs to undertake the  








                                                                  AB 1199
                                                                  Page  3

          certification process, which would require review as to the  
          adequacy of the improvement plan and the "new" funding source,  
          in relation to the district's entire financial status.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  . Existing law provides a year of stabilization  
            funding, during which the district receives at least the same  
            funding for enrollment as the previous year (even if  
            enrollment declines) or higher funding (up to an allowable  
            cap) if enrollment increases. This is because a district  
            usually does not know that its full-time equivalent student  
            (FTES) count has declined until it begins its enrollment  
            counts, which occur at the same time the state is disbursing  
            funds and after the district has hired faculty and determined  
            its class schedules.  If enrollment declines beyond just one  
            year, the district's revenues are reduced by the decrease in  
            its FTES.  However, those reductions are restored if  
            enrollments increase during the subsequent three years,  
            providing a district with a buffer against fluctuating  
            enrollments.

            AB 1199 requires the BOG to adopt a formula for qualifying  
            districts, meeting the conditions described above, that would  
            provide one additional year of stabilization funding for  
            districts under severe accreditation sanction, and would  
            require those districts to use new funding sources to repay  
            the additional year's funding over the subsequent two years.

            According to the author, "Colleges receiving severe  
            accreditation sanction often suffer immediate reduction of  
            their enrollment.  This leads to a potential funding loss,  
            putting pressure on the college's ability to make adjustments  
            and recover its full accreditation.  For example, the City  
            College of San Francisco (CCSF) is experiencing the direct  
            effects of severe sanctions.  CCSF has seen their enrollment  
            drop dramatically with the threat of losing their  
            accreditation.  This action compounds the already declining  
            enrollment due to a lack of classes offered as a direct result  
            of state budget cuts from previous years.  This bill will  
            provide a stabilization formula over a three-year period in  
            order to keep courses open for students and ensure a high  
            quality education by retaining faculty."

           2)Accreditation  is required to receive state appropriations and  








                                                                  AB 1199
                                                                  Page  4

            to be eligible for federal and state financial aid programs.   
            There are three levels of sanction:  Warning, Probation, and  
            Show Cause.  Follow up reports and accreditation visits are  
            required to retain full accreditation.

            Many community colleges have faced accreditation sanctions,  
            including Show Cause. With the exception of Compton College in  
            2004, all have retained accreditation. Of the community  
            colleges, six are on Probation status and two are on Show  
            Cause status-CCSF and College of the Sequoias.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081