BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1200| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 1200 Author: Levine (D) Amended: 8/27/13 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE : 9-0, 6/26/13 AYES: Hill, Gaines, Calderon, Corbett, Fuller, Hancock, Jackson, Leno, Pavley SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 5-0, 8/12/13 AYES: De León, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Steinberg NO VOTE RECORDED: Walters, Padilla ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 72-0, 5/24/13 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Recycled water: agricultural irrigation impoundments: pilot project SOURCE : Sonoma County Water Agency DIGEST : This bill permits the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SF Regional Board) to authorize a five-year pilot project in Sonoma County that would study the effects, if any, of allowing small agricultural irrigation ponds containing recycled water to occasionally overflow during storm events into an area that is already irrigated by recycled water. Senate Floor Amendments of 8/27/13 add back the sunset date removed in previous amendments. CONTINUED AB 1200 Page 2 ANALYSIS : Existing law: 1. Requires, under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (regional boards) to enforce water quality laws and regulations for the state's waterways. 2. Establishes the Water Recycling Act of 1991, creating a statewide goal to recycle a total of 700,000 acre-feet of water per year by 2000 and 1,000,000 acre-feet of water per year by 2010. 3. Requires each urban water supplier to prepare, and update every five years, an urban water management plan with specified components, including information on recycled water and its potential for use as a water source in the service area of the urban water supplier. This bill: 1. Makes findings including, but not limited to, acknowledging California's freshwater supplies are limited and oversubscribed thus creating pressure on economic, ecosystem and community needs and that recycled water could meet some of those challenges. 2. Recognizes that the Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District (District) produces an average of 3.5 million gallons of tertiary recycled water daily, much of which discharges into a San Pablo Bay tributary, and that this pilot project would help maximize recycled water use. 3. Permits, before October 1, 2014, the SF Regional Board to authorize a voluntary pilot project to measure, analyze, and report water quality data collected upstream and downstream of three to four small agricultural irrigation impoundments of recycled water before, during, and after at least five storm events where water overflows and comingles with other surface waters. Specifies water quality and environmental parameters for the study. CONTINUED AB 1200 Page 3 4. Requires agricultural impoundments that are eligible for the pilot project to be pre-existing as of January 1, 2013; to hold 200 acre-feet or less of water; and, to be located within an agricultural area already receiving disinfected tertiary recycled water. 5. Establishes a 10-person stakeholder advisory group with representatives from nongovernmental organizations, regional agriculture, private landowners, the District, the Sonoma County Water Agency (Agency) and the SF Regional Board to review and provide input on project design, implementation, and data analysis. 6. Requires the project proponents to identify and secure funding for all costs associated with the development and implementation of the pilot project. 7. Requires, within 12 months of final data collection, that the data shall be analyzed and a draft report made available for stakeholder advisory group review and comment. Requires a final report to the SF Regional Board within three months of the release of the draft report. 8. Permits the SF Regional Board, upon review of the final report, to develop a formula for future waste discharge requirements to be issued for similar purposes and report to the state board and the Legislature with any recommendations, as prescribed. 9. Repeals authority for the pilot project on January 1, 2018, unless that date is statutorily deleted or extended. Background Recycled water . According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), water recycling is reusing treated waste water for beneficial purposes such as agricultural and landscape irrigation, industrial processes, toilet flushing, and replenishing a ground water basin (ground water recharge). Water is sometimes recycled and reused on site; for example, when an industrial facility recycles water used for cooling processes. A common type of recycled water is water that has been reclaimed from municipal waste water, or sewage. The term water recycling is generally used synonymously with water CONTINUED AB 1200 Page 4 reclamation and water reuse. US EPA notes that recycled water can satisfy most water demands, as long as it is adequately treated to ensure quality appropriate for the use. In uses where there is a greater chance of human exposure to the water, more treatment is required. As for any water source that is not properly treated, health problems could arise from drinking or being exposed to recycled water if it contains disease-causing organisms or other contaminants. Recycled water regulation in California . In California, SWRCB establishes general policies governing the permitting of recycled water projects consistent with its role of protecting water quality and sustaining water supplies. SWRCB exercises general oversight over recycled water projects, including review of regional board permitting practices (including National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits), and leads the effort to meet the recycled water use goals set forth in state recycled water policy. SWRCB is also charged by statute with developing a general permit for irrigation uses of recycled water. While SWRCB is responsible for the bulk of recycled water regulation, it shares jurisdiction over the use of recycled water with the regional boards and with the Department of Public Health. In addition, the Department of Water Resources and the Public Utilities Commission have roles to play in encouraging the use of recycled water. California's recycled water policy . On February 3, 2009, SWRCB adopted Resolution 2009-11, a policy for water quality control for recycled water. In adopting the resolution, SWRCB made a finding that the Strategic Plan Update 2008-12 for the state and regional boards includes a priority to increase sustainable local water supplies available for meeting existing and future beneficial uses and to ensure adequate water flows for fish and wildlife habitat. SWRCB found that increasing the acceptance and promoting the use of recycled water is a means towards achieving sustainable local water supplies and can result in the reduction in greenhouse gases. It also found that the recycled water policy is intended to encourage beneficial use of, rather than solely disposal of, recycled water. According to SWRCB, the purpose of the Recycled Water Policy CONTINUED AB 1200 Page 5 (Policy) is to increase the use of recycled water from municipal wastewater sources in a manner that implements state and federal water quality laws. When used in compliance with the Policy and applicable state and federal water quality laws, SWRCB argues that recycled water is safe for approved uses, and strongly supports recycled water as a safe alternative to potable water for such approved uses. The Policy establishes a mandate to increase the use of recycled water in California by 200,000 acre-feet per year (afy) by 2020 and by an additional 300,000 afy by 2030. Recycled water in the proposed pilot project region . The District currently holds a NPDES permit for point source discharges into surface waters (Order No. R2-2008-0090). The District owns and the Agency operates wastewater treatment plant and collection systems. The plant provides secondary treatment to the wastewater collected from the City of Sonoma, unincorporated areas of Glen Ellen, Boyes Hot Springs, El Verano, and Agua Caliente. Treatment processes consist of flow equalization; pretreatment by screening and grit removal; extended aeration activated sludge treatment; secondary sedimentation; and effluent disinfection by chlorination and de-chlorination. Comments According to the Agency and its agricultural landowner partners risk being penalized if small irrigation ponds storing high quality recycled water overflow during a rain event, despite the fact that they currently hold water quality permits allowing for discharge, tidal habitat restoration, and agricultural irrigation within the same watershed and using the same recycled water. The Agency argues that the financial risk to it and its landowner partners has limited its ability to use highly treated recycled water to its greatest potential. The Agency asserts that by authorizing a water quality monitoring pilot project in the Los Carneros wine grape region, this bill can provide state and regional regulatory entities, the public, and their partners in the agricultural sector with data necessary to advance innovative recycled water reuse projects. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes CONTINUED AB 1200 Page 6 Local: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: One-time costs up to $65,000 to the Waste Discharge Permit Fund (special) for the SF Regional Board to permit the pilot project and participate in the stakeholder advisory group. Ongoing cost pressures of $65,000 annually for three years to the Waste Discharge Permit Fund (special) for the SF Regional Board to consider the development of a formula for future waste discharge permits for discharges similar to the pilot project. SUPPORT : (Verified 8/28/13) Sonoma County Water Agency (source) California Association of Sanitation Agencies California Farm Bureau Federation Irvine Ranch Water District League of Women Voters California Napa County Supervisor, Brad Wagenknecht, District 1 Napa Valley Vintners North Bay Water Reuse Authority Novato Sanitary District Russian Riverkeeper Wine Institute ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author: Existing law treats recycled water as a waste. Regional water quality control boards issue permits with this in mind. The result in Sonoma and Napa valleys, regulated under the San Francisco Bay regional water quality control board, is that storage is underutilized and use is not maximized. This is a particularly poor use of resources because the use of less recycled water means the use of more raw or groundwater. The bill would allow for a pilot project that examines from a scientific approach the effect of increased storage in up to four small existing ponds. The issue with current law is that the regional board does not feel that they can move forward with allowing storage until CONTINUED AB 1200 Page 7 there is information about any impacts of recycled water storage overflow. The regional board needs information on the impacts of storage to approve storage, but the only way to get the information on the impacts of storage is to move forward with storage. This creates a situation where it would be administratively possible to move forward with a pilot project, but that administrative possibility is not going to occur. Recycled water is currently used in this watershed for agricultural and habitat restoration. Recycled water that is not used is discharged into the same watershed. ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 72-0, 5/24/13 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Bigelow, Bloom, Blumenfield, Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gordon, Gorell, Gray, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hernández, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Mansoor, Medina, Melendez, Mitchell, Morrell, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Salas, Stone, Ting, Wagner, Weber, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez NO VOTE RECORDED: Bonta, Grove, Holden, Skinner, Waldron, Wilk, Vacancy, Vacancy RM:k 8/28/13 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED