AB 1219, as introduced, Morrell. Administrative Procedure Act: adverse economic impact.
Existing law, the Administrative Procedure Act, governs the procedure for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of regulations by state agencies and for the review of those regulatory actions by the Office of Administrative Law. Existing law requires the agency to assess the potential for adverse economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals, as specified.
This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to this provision.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 11346.3 of the Government Code is
2amended to read:
(a) State agencies proposing to adopt, amend, or
4repeal any administrative regulation shall assess the potential for
5adverse economic impact on California business enterprises and
6individuals, avoiding the imposition of unnecessary or unreasonable
P2 1regulations or reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance
2requirements. For purposes of this subdivision, assessing the
3potential for adverse economic impactbegin delete shall requireend deletebegin insert requiresend insert
4 agencies, when proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a regulation,
5to adhere to the following requirements, to the extentbegin delete thatend delete these
6
requirements do not conflict with other state or federal laws:
7(1) The proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation
8shall be based on adequate information concerning the need for,
9and consequences of, proposed governmental action.
10(2) The state agency, prior to submitting a proposal to adopt,
11amend, or repeal a regulation to the office, shall consider the
12proposal’s impact on business, with consideration of industries
13affected including the ability of California businesses to compete
14with businesses in other states. For purposes of evaluating the
15impact on the ability of California businesses to compete with
16businesses in other states, an agency shall consider, but not be
17limited to, information supplied by interested parties.
18(3) An economic assessment prepared pursuant to this
19subdivision for a proposed
regulation that is not a major regulation
20or that is a major regulation proposed prior to November 1, 2013,
21shall be prepared in accordance with subdivision (b). An economic
22assessment prepared pursuant to this subdivision for a major
23regulation proposed on or after November 1, 2013, shall be
24prepared in accordance with subdivision (c), and shall be included
25in the initial statement of reasons as required by Section 11346.2.
26(b) (1) All state agencies proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal
27a regulation that is not a major regulation or that is a major
28regulation proposed prior to November 1, 2013, shall prepare an
29economic impact assessment that assesses whether and to what
30extent it will affect the following:
31(A) The creation or elimination of jobs within the state.
32(B) The creation of new
businesses or the elimination of existing
33businesses within the state.
34(C) The expansion of businesses currently doing business within
35the state.
36(D) The benefits of the regulation to the health and welfare of
37California residents, worker safety, and the state’s environment.
38(2) This subdivision does not apply to the University of
39California, the Hastings College of the Law, or the Fair Political
40Practices Commission.
P3 1(3) Information required from state agencies for the purpose of
2completing the assessment may come from existing state
3publications.
4(c) (1) Each state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal
5a major regulation on or after November 1, 2013, shall
prepare a
6standardized regulatory impact analysis in the manner prescribed
7by the Department of Finance pursuant to Section 11346.36. The
8standardized regulatory impact analysis shall address all of the
9following:
10(A) The creation or elimination of jobs within the state.
11(B) The creation of new businesses or the elimination of existing
12businesses within the state.
13(C) The competitive advantages or disadvantages for businesses
14currently doing business within the state.
15(D) The increase or decrease of investment in the state.
16(E) The incentives for innovation in products, materials, or
17processes.
18(F) The benefits of the
regulations, including, but not limited
19to, benefits to the health, safety, and welfare of California residents,
20worker safety, and the state’s environment and quality of life,
21among any other benefits identified by the agency.
22(2) This subdivision shall not apply to the University of
23California, the Hastings College of the Law, or the Fair Political
24Practices Commission.
25(3) Information required from state agencies for the purpose of
26completing the analysis may be derived from existing state, federal,
27or academic publications.
28(d) Any administrative regulation adopted on or after January
291, 1993, that requires a report shall not apply to businesses, unless
30the state agency adopting the regulation makes a finding that it is
31necessary for the health, safety, or welfare of the people of the
32state that the regulation
apply to businesses.
33(e) Analyses conducted pursuant to this section are intended to
34provide agencies and the public with tools to determine whether
35the regulatory proposal is an efficient and effective means of
36implementing the policy decisions enactedbegin delete inend deletebegin insert byend insert statute or by other
37provisions of law in the least burdensome manner. Regulatory
38impact analyses shall inform the agencies and the public of the
39economic consequences of regulatory choices, not reassess
40statutory policy. The baseline for the regulatory analysis shall be
P4 1the most cost-effective set of regulatory measures that are equally
2effective in achieving the purpose of the regulation in a manner
3that ensures full compliance with the authorizing statute or other
4law being implemented or made
specific by the proposed
5regulation.
6(f) Each state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a
7major regulation on or after November 1, 2013, and that has
8prepared a standardized regulatory impact analysis pursuant to
9subdivision (c), shall submit that analysis to the Department of
10Finance upon completion. The department shall comment, within
1130 days of receiving that analysis, on the extent to which the
12analysis adheres to the regulations adopted pursuant to Section
1311346.36. Upon receiving the comments from the department, the
14agency may update its analysis to reflect any comments received
15from the department and shall summarize the comments and the
16response of the agency along with a statement of the results of the
17updated analysis for the statement required by paragraph (10) of
18subdivision (a) of Section 11346.5.
O
99