BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 1235
Page 1
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 1235 (Gordon)
As Amended May 24, 2013
Majority vote
LOCAL GOVERNMENT 7-2 APPROPRIATIONS 12-5
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Ayes:|Achadjian, Levine, Alejo, |Ayes:|Gatto, Bocanegra, |
| |Bradford, Gordon, Mullin, | |Bradford, |
| |Frazier | |Ian Calderon, Campos, |
| | | |Eggman, Gomez, Hall, |
| | | |Ammiano, Pan, Quirk, |
| | | |Weber |
| | | | |
|-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
|Nays:|Melendez, Waldron |Nays:|Harkey, Bigelow, |
| | | |Donnelly, Linder, Wagner |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Requires specified local agency officials to complete
financial management training once per term of office.
Specifically, this bill :
1)Provides that, if a local agency provides any type of
compensation, salary, or stipend to a member of a legislative
body, or provides reimbursement for actual and necessary
expenses incurred by a member of a legislative body in the
performance of official duties, then all local agency
officials shall receive training in financial management.
2)Requires each official subject to the requirements of 1)
above, to receive training in general financial management
principles and financial management laws relevant to his or
her public service once per term of office.
3)Requires any entity that develops curricula to satisfy the
requirements of this bill to consult with the Treasurer's
office and the Controller's office regarding the sufficiency
and accuracy of any proposed course content. When reviewing
any proposed course content the Treasurer's office and the
Controller's office shall not preclude an entity from also
including local financial management policies in the
curricula.
AB 1235
Page 2
4)Allows a local agency or an association of local agencies to
offer one or more training courses, or sets of self-study
materials with tests, to meet the requirements of this bill.
These courses may be taken at home, in-person, or online.
5)Requires all providers of training courses to meet the
training requirements of this bill to provide participants
with proof of participation to meet the record-keeping
requirements imposed by this bill.
6)Requires a local agency to provide information on training
available to meet the requirements of this bill to its local
officials at least once annually.
7)Requires each local agency official in local agency service as
of January 1, 2014, except for officials whose term of office
ends before January 1, 2015, to receive the training required
by this bill before January 1, 2015. Thereafter, each local
agency official shall receive the required training required
at least once per term of office.
8)Requires each local agency official who commences service with
a local agency on or after January 1, 2014, to receive the
training required by this bill no later than one year from the
first day of service with the local agency. Thereafter, each
local agency official shall receive the required training at
least once per term of office.
9)Requires a local agency official who serves more than one
local agency to satisfy the requirements of this bill once per
term of office of one of the agencies without regard to the
number of local agencies with which he or she serves.
10)Requires a local agency that requires its local agency
officials to complete the financial management training
prescribed by this bill to maintain records indicating the
dates that local officials satisfied the training
requirements, and the entity that provided the training.
These records must be maintained for at least five years after
local officials receive the training. These records are
public records subject to disclosure under the California
Public Records Act.
AB 1235
Page 3
11)Finds and declares that the edification of local government
officials in financial management is a matter of statewide
concern and not merely a municipal affair, as that term is
used in the California Constitution, and that, therefore, this
bill shall apply to charter cities, charter counties, and
charter cities and counties.
12)Provides the following definitions:
a) "Legislative body" means the governing body of a local
agency or any other local body created by state or federal
statute;
b) "Local agency" means a city, county, city and county,
charter city, charter county, charter city and county, or
special district;
c) "Local agency official" means either of the following:
i) Any member of a local agency legislative body or any
elected local agency official who receives any type of
compensation, salary, or stipend or reimbursement for
actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance
of official duties; or,
ii) Any employee designated by a local agency
legislative body to receive the training specified under
this article.
d) "Financial management training" includes, but is not
limited to, the following:
i) Laws and commonly accepted best practices relating
to local budgeting, including, but not limited to,
revenue sources, debt instruments, budget monitoring, and
financial policies;
ii) Laws relating to financial reporting requirements
for local agencies at the local, state, and federal
levels, including auditing requirements;
iii) Laws and commonly accepted best practices relating
to long-term financial planning, cash management, and
investments, for local agencies;
AB 1235
Page 4
iv) Laws and commonly accepted best practices relating
to capital financing and debt management; and,
v) Laws relating to purchasing and contracting
practices.
13)Provides that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines
that this act contains costs mandated by the state,
reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those
costs shall be made pursuant to current law governing state
mandated local costs.
EXISTING LAW requires local government officials and designated
employees to receive two hours of ethics training every two
years, as specified.
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, possible reimbursable costs of approximately
$150,000. This bill is a reimbursable mandate for certain local
governments, specifically the 44 general law counties and
certain special districts who are required to pay compensation
or reimburse for expenses. For most local governments, those
payments are a choice, not a matter of legal requirement, so
this bill will not be a reimbursable state mandate for them. In
addition, many of the special districts that would be subject to
the bill's provisions are not eligible for reimbursement.
COMMENTS : This bill establishes financial management training
requirements for local agency officials, which would apply to
any member of a local agency governing body or any other local
body created by state or federal statute who receives any type
of compensation, salary, or stipend or reimbursement for actual
and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of official
duties. The bill applies to cities, counties, charter cities,
charter counties, and special districts.
Provisions of the bill require entities that offer training to
consult with the Treasurer's office and the Controller's office
regarding the sufficiency and accuracy of any proposed course
content, and to provide proof of participation that meets
record-keeping requirements imposed by the bill. Local agencies
would be required to keep specified records of the training for
at least five years. This bill is sponsored by the author.
AB 1235
Page 5
According to the author's office, "One of the primary
responsibilities of any local official is the responsible
management of public agency finances. But, in order to properly
manage public funds, an official must understand the complex and
often unstable world of local agency financing. From the
reliability and restricted use of various revenue streams, to
the appropriations (Gann) limit, to bond restrictions - there
are hundreds of rules and regulations designed to protect the
taxpayer, but which the average citizen may not be familiar with
or fully understand. Indeed, even a new local official may be
more familiar with the service needs in their community than the
financial constraints of the local agency in meeting those
needs."
Current law requires two hours of ethics training for local
government officials and designated employees every two years.
This bill establishes similar requirements for training in
financial management, without specifying a particular number of
required training hours. The author's office notes that
financial training courses are offered by the Institute for
Local Government (ILG) and the California State Association of
Counties (CSAC) Institute.
The ILG is the research and education affiliate of CSAC and the
League of California Cities. It offers a "Local Government 101"
course, including materials on financial management for elected
officials. The CSAC Institute provides professional development
specifically created for county supervisors, other county
elected officials and senior executives in county service. It
offers a broad range of courses including several that pertain
to county finance.
The California Special Districts Association, in support,
writes, "Fiscal responsibility in public agencies is paramount.
As the task of governing these agencies has become even more
complex, regulated and costly, it has become increasingly
important to demonstrate to the public that local agencies are
appropriately managed."
The League of California Cities, in opposition, states, "The
policy assumption behind the bill appears to be that local
officials (in our case city officials) are not receiving
sufficient training on financial matters. We cannot agree with
AB 1235
Page 6
this assumption?Just this past January, 440 newly elected
council members gathered in Sacramento for an annual three-day
training that included a 2.5 hour workshop titled: 'Financial
Responsibilities, City Revenues Workshop.' The League also
hosts many conferences and educational seminars each year (that
include financial topics.) The League also has long supported
the development and maintenance of a website that is widely
recognized as the best source of information on city finance:
Californiacityfinance.com. Other organizations also exist that
focus on professional development and training of city officials
such as the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers,
and the California Municipal Treasurers Association.
"In short, we do not believe that it is necessary or appropriate
for the state to impose uniform, state-supervised financial
training requirements on cities. A review of the bill also
raises additional issues:
1)Under the measure the curricula must be reviewed for
sufficiency by the Treasurer and the Controller. We think
this is an inappropriate incursion of state authority. The
League is a well-respected source of accurate information, we
understand the unique issues facing cities, and always reach
out to the top experts for our conferences and seminars.
2)All five of the paragraphs listing the information to be
provided begin with the word "Laws." There are clearly many
laws affecting financial issues, but a four-hour workshop
listing various laws - many of which are highly technical and
complicated - may not be the most informative educational
exercise for elected officials.
3)City officials that have reviewed this bill have asked why
state elected officials would not also be subject to the same
training requirement. These city officials believe that - on
the whole - cities have a better track record than the state
for managing their budgets in a disciplined manner, adopting
annual balanced budgets, and maintaining sufficient reserves
for economic downturns.
4)City officials are also concerned that the training required
by this measure could lead to a slippery slope of other state
training requirements, imposing further burdens and eroding
local flexibility. "
AB 1235
Page 7
The Association of California Water Agencies, in opposition,
"suggests the following two amendments to the bill: (1) a local
agency should only be subject to compulsory financial management
training if it violates existing financially related laws or
regulations; and (2) all other local agencies should be
permitted to elect to provide financial management training to
their officials if the local agency so desires."
Support arguments: Supporters argue that this bill provides for
greater training of local officials to help ensure they have
necessary information to make responsible fiscal decisions for
their agencies and for California taxpayers.
Opposition arguments: Opponents contend that this bill is an
unnecessary state incursion into local government affairs, and
that local agencies already provide adequate financial training
to local officials and employees.
Analysis Prepared by : Angela Mapp / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958
FN: 0000915