AB 1249, as amended, Salas. Integrated regional water management plans: nitratebegin insert, arsenic, perchlorate, or hexavalent chromiumend insert contamination.
Existing law, the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006, an initiative bond act approved by the voters as Proposition 84 at the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, authorized the issuance of bonds in the amount of $5,388,000,000 for the purposes of financing a safe drinking water, water quality and supply, flood control, and resource protection program. Existing law, with regard to those bond funds, makes available to the Department of Water Resources, $1,000,000,000 for grants for projects that assist local public agencies to meet the long term water needs of the state including the delivery of safe drinking water and the protection of water quality and the environment. The act requires that eligible projects implement integrated regional water management plans that meet specified criteria and requires the department to give preference to certain proposals.
Existing law, the Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Act, authorizes a regional water management group, as defined, to prepare and adopt an integrated regional water management plan. The act requires the Department of Water Resources to develop and adopt guidelines for the preparation of integrated regional water management plans used to apply for the above-described Proposition 84 funds.
begin insertThis bill would make the guidelines applicable to all funds that are or may become available for integrated regional water management plan implementation.
end insertThis
end deletebegin insertTheend insert bill would require an integrated regional water management plan to include an explanation of how the plan addresses nitrate contamination, or an explanation of why the plan does not address nitrate contamination, if an area within the boundaries of the plan has been identified as a nitrate high-risk area by the State Water Resources Control Board.
The bill would require the department when selecting projects for the above-described funds to establish a preference for projects that implement integrated regional water management plans that address nitrate impacts in areas identified as nitrate high-risk areas.
begin insertThe bill would impose these same requirements with respect to arsenic, perchlorate, or hexavalent chromium contamination, irrespective of whether an area within the boundaries of the plan has been identified as high risk for those contaminants.
end insertVote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 10541 of the Water Code is amended to
2read:
(a) The department shall develop project solicitation
4and evaluation guidelines for the application of funds made
5available pursuant to Section 75026 of the Public Resources Code
6begin insert and all other funds that are or may become available for integrated
7regional water management plan implementation, including a
8future water bondend insert, to enable broad and diverse participation in
9integrated regional water management plan development and
10refinement.
P3 1(b) The department shall conduct two public meetings to
2consider public comments prior to finalizing the guidelines. The
3department shall
publish the draft solicitation and evaluation
4guidelines on its Internet Web site at least 30 days before the public
5meetings. One meeting shall be conducted at a location in northern
6California and one meeting shall be conducted at a location in
7southern California. Upon adoption, the department shall transmit
8copies of the guidelines to the fiscal committees and the appropriate
9policy committees of the Legislature. To the extent feasible, each
10state agency shall provide outreach to disadvantaged communities
11to promote access to and participation in those meetings.
12(c) The department shall consult with the board, the California
13regional water quality control boards, the State Department of
14Public Health, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the California
15Bay-Delta Authority or its successor, and other state agencies with
16water management
responsibility and authority in the development
17of the guidelines.
18(d) The department may periodically review and update the
19guidelines to accommodate changes in funding sources, statutory
20requirements, new commonly accepted management practices,
21and changes in state water management policy. Any guideline
22changes shall be made with appropriate consultation with other
23state agencies and public review pursuant to subdivisions (b) and
24(c).
25(e) The guidelines shall require that integrated regional water
26management plans include all of the following:
27(1) Consideration of all of the resource management strategies
28identified in the California Water Plan, as updated by department
29Bulletin No. 160-2005 and future
updates.
30(2) Consideration of objectives in the appropriate basin plan or
31plans and strategies to meet applicable water quality standards.
32(3) Description of the major water-related objectives and
33conflicts within a region.
34(4) Measurable regional objectives and criteria for developing
35regional project priorities.
36(5) An integrated, collaborative, multibenefit approach to
37selection and design of projects and programs.
38(6) Identification and consideration of the water-related needs
39of disadvantaged communities in the area within the boundaries
40of the plan.
P4 1(7) Performance measures and monitoring to demonstrate
2progress toward meeting regional objectives.
3(8) A plan for implementation and financing of identified
4projects and programs.
5(9) Consideration of greenhouse gas emissions of identified
6programs and projects.
7(10) Evaluation of the adaptability to climate change of water
8management systems in the region.
9(11) Documentation of data and technical analyses used in the
10development of the plan.
11(12) A process to disseminate data and information related to
12the development and implementation of the plan.
13(13) A process to coordinate water management projects and
14activities of participating local agencies and local stakeholders to
15avoid conflicts and take advantage of efficiencies.
16(14) If an area within the boundaries of the plan has been
17identified as a nitrate high-risk area by the state board, the plan
18
shall include an explanation of how the plan addresses the nitrate
19contamination or, if the plan does not address the nitrate
20contamination, an explanation of why the plan does not address
21the nitrate contamination.begin insert The plan shall include an explanation
22of how the plan addresses arsenic, perchlorate, or hexavalent
23chromium contamination, or if the plan does not address those
24contaminants, an explanation of why the plan does not address
25that contamination.end insert
26(15) Any other matters identified by the department.
27(f) The guidelines shall include standards for identifying a region
28for the purpose of developing or modifying an integrated regional
29water management plan. At a minimum, a region shall be a
30contiguous
geographic area encompassing the service areas of
31multiple local agencies, and shall be defined to maximize
32
opportunities for integration of water management activities. The
33department shall develop a process to approve the composition of
34a region for the purposes of Sections 75026, 75027, and 75028 of
35the Public Resources Code.
36(g) The guidelines shall require that the development and
37implementation of an integrated regional water management plan
38include a public process that provides outreach and an opportunity
39to participate in plan development and implementation to
P5 1appropriate local agencies and stakeholders, as applicable to the
2region, including all of the following:
3(1) Wholesale and retail water purveyors, including a local
4agency, mutual water company, or a water corporation as defined
5in Section 241 of the Public Utilities Code.
6(2) Wastewater agencies.
7(3) Flood control agencies.
8(4) Municipal and county governments and special districts.
9(5) Electrical corporations, as defined in Section 218 of the
10Public Utilities Code.
11(6) Native American tribes that have lands within the region.
12(7) Self-supplied water users, including agricultural, industrial,
13residential, park districts, school districts, colleges and universities,
14and others.
15(8) Environmental stewardship organizations, including
16watershed
groups, fishing groups, land conservancies, and
17environmental groups.
18(9) Community organizations, including landowner
19organizations, taxpayer groups, and recreational interests.
20(10) Industry organizations representing agriculture, developers,
21and other industries appropriate to the region.
22(11) State, federal, and regional agencies or universities, with
23specific responsibilities or knowledge within the region.
24(12) Disadvantaged community members and representatives,
25including environmental justice organizations, neighborhood
26councils, and social justice organizations.
27(13) Any other interested groups appropriate to the region.
28(h) The guidelines shall require integrated regional water
29management plans to be developed through a collaborative process
30that makes public both of the following:
31(1) The process by which decisions are made in consultation
32with the persons or entities identified in subdivision (g).
33(2) The manner in which a balance of interested persons or
34entities representing different sectors and interests listed in
35subdivision (g) have been or will be engaged in the process
36described in this subdivision, regardless of their ability to contribute
37financially to the plan.
38(i) The guidelines shall provide for a process for the
39development,
periodic review, updating, and amending of
40integrated regional water management plans. The department shall
P6 1establish eligibility requirements for the project funding, that
2provide sufficient time for the updating of plans as necessary to
3reflect changes in the guidelines.
Section 10545 is added to the Water Code, to read:
When selecting projects pursuant to Section 75026 of
6the Public Resources Codebegin insert or for other funds that are or may
7become available for integrated regional water management plan
8implementation forend insert, the department shall provide a preference for
9projects that implement integrated regional water management
10plans that addressbegin delete nitrateend deletebegin insert either of the following:end insert
11begin insert(a)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertNitrateend insert impacts in areas that have been identified by the
12state board as nitrate high-risk areas, including projects that provide
13safe drinking water to small disadvantaged communities.
14(b) Arsenic, perchlorate, or hexavalent chromium impacts,
15including projects that provide safe drinking water to small
16disadvantaged communities.
O
97