BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1258
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 8, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                   AB 1258 (Skinner) - As Amended:  April 23, 2013

          Policy Committee:                              Utilities and  
          Commerce     Vote:                            15-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the California Energy Commission (CEC), in  
          consultation with other state and federal agencies, electrical  
          corporations and publicly-owned utilities, to perform a  
          technical analysis of the potential uses of existing  
          hydro-electric and pumped storage facilities to provide  
          additional operational flexibility to integrate eligible  
          renewable energy sources into the grid.  Specifically, this  
          bill:

          1)Requires CEC to consult with the following when preparing the  
            technical analysis:
             a)   The Public Utilities Commission (PUC).
             b)   The Department of Water Resources (DWR).
             c)   The Independent System Operator (ISO).
             d)   Electrical corporations.
             e)   Publicly-owned utilities.
             f)   Federal power marketing authorities.
             g)   The Bureau of Reclamation.

          1)Requires the technical analysis to include scenarios that meet  
            California's environmental and energy goals in a manner that  
            reduces impacts to the environment and costs to customers at  
            five specified pumped storage facilities.

          2)Requires the CEC to complete its initial technical analysis by  
            November 1, 2014.

          3)Allows the CEC to include this technical analysis in the  
            Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR) prepared by the  
            commission every two years.








                                                                  AB 1258
                                                                  Page  2


          4)Sunsets January 1, 2017

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Significant costs, potentially up to $1 million, for CEC to  
            perform the technical study.

          2)Minor, costs to DWR, PUC and ISO.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale.    The use of gas-fired generators to meet peak  
            energy demand adds to carbon emissions and other air  
            pollutants.   A better solution may be to use hydroelectric  
            facilities to pump water uphill when the supply of renewable  
            energy exceeds the demand, then release the water downhill  
            when the demand exceeds the supply, thereby generating clean  
            emission-free energy to meet peak demand.  

             The author intends the technical analysis to provide the  
            information necessary for the PUC to determine whether  
            existing hydroelectric facilities can provide the necessary  
            operational flexibility.

          2)  Background.   As required by law, the PUC opened a new  
            proceeding to determine the appropriate targets, if any, for  
            each load-serving entity to procure viable and cost-saving  
            energy storage systems by 2015 and 2020.

            Through the rate-payer funded Electric Program Investment  
            Charge (EPIC) the PUC is considering funding energy storage  
            research through both CEC and investor-owned utilities.  The  
            PUC is currently required to investigate the potential for  
            energy storage at Helms, Balsam, Meadow and Oroville.  This  
            bill also requires the CEC to perform the technical study on  
            Castaic.

           3)Support.   This bill is supported by the Public Utilities  
            Commission and the Clean Power Campaign.

           4)Opposition.   Numerous water agencies oppose this bill due to  
            the potential to impact the primary mission of the State Water  
            Project (SWP) to ensure reliable water deliveries residential  
            and agricultural purposes.  








                                                                 AB 1258
                                                                  Page  3

           
           5)Energy Commission.   It is not clear the CEC has the staff  
            expertise to prepare a detailed technical analysis of  
            hydroelectric and pumped storage or the authority to compel  
            participation of the state's investor-owned utilities,  
            publicly-owned utilities and other relevant state and federal  
            agencies.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081