AB 1259, as introduced, Olsen. Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: Delta Plan: Bay Delta Conservation Plan.
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009 establishes the Delta Stewardship Council, which is required to develop, adopt, and commence implementation of a comprehensive management plan for the Delta (Delta Plan) by January 1, 2012. The act requires the council to consider for inclusion in the Delta Plan a multispecies conservation plan called the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP), and requires the incorporation of the BDCP into the Delta Plan if the BDCP meets certain requirements.
This bill would make a technical, nonsubstantive change in this provision.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 85320 of the Water Code is amended to
(a) The Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) shall be
2considered for inclusion in the Delta Plan in accordance with this
4(b) The BDCP shall not be incorporated into the Delta Plan and
5the public benefits associated with the BDCP shall not be eligible
6for state funding, unless the BDCP does all of the following:
7(1) Complies with Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800)
8of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code.
9(2) Complies with Division 13 (commencing with Section
1021000) of the Public Resources Code, including a comprehensive
11review and analysis of all of the following:
12(A) A reasonable range of flow criteria, rates of diversion, and
13other operational criteria required to satisfy the criteria for approval
14of a natural community conservation plan as provided in
15subdivision (a) of Section 2820 of the Fish and Game Code, and
16other operational requirements and flows necessary for recovering
17the Delta ecosystem and restoring fisheries under a reasonable
18range of hydrologic conditions, which will identify the remaining
19water available for export and other beneficial uses.
20(B) A reasonable range of Delta conveyance alternatives,
21including through-Delta, dual conveyance, and isolated conveyance
22alternatives and including further capacity and design options of
23a lined canal, an unlined canal, and pipelines.
24(C) The potential effects of climate change, possible sea level
25rise up to 55 inches, and possible changes in total precipitation
26and runoff patterns on the conveyance alternatives and habitat
27restoration activities considered in the environmental impact report.
28(D) The potential effects on migratory fish and aquatic resources.
29(E) The potential effects on Sacramento River and San Joaquin
30River flood management.
31(F) The resilience and recovery of Delta conveyance alternatives
32in the event of catastrophic loss caused by earthquake or flood or
33other natural disaster.
34(G) The potential effects of each Delta conveyance alternative
35on Delta water quality.
36(c) The department shall consult with the council and the Delta
37Independent Science Board during the development of the BDCP.
38The council shall be a responsible agency in the development of
39the environmental impact report. The Delta Independent Science
40Board shall review the draft environmental impact report and
P3 1 submit its comments to the council and the Department of Fish
3(d) If the Department of Fish and Game approves the BDCP as
4a natural community conservation plan pursuant to Chapter 10
5(commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and
6Game Code, the council shall have at least one public hearing
7concerning the incorporation of the BDCP into the Delta Plan.
8(e) If the Department of Fish and Game approves the BDCP as
9a natural community conservation plan pursuant to Chapter 10
10(commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and
11Game Code and determines that the BDCP meets the requirements
12of this section, and the BDCP has been approved as a habitat
13conservation plan pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act
14(16 U.S.C. Section 1531 et seq.), the council shall incorporate the
15BDCP into the Delta Plan. The Department of Fish and Game’s
16determination that the BDCP has met the requirements of this
17section may be appealed to the council.
18(f) The department, in coordination with the Department of Fish
19and Game, or any successor agencies charged with BDCP
20implementation, shall report to the council on the implementation
21of the BDCP at least once a year, including the status of monitoring
22programs and adaptive management.
23(g) The council may make recommendations to BDCP
24implementing agencies regarding the implementation of the BDCP.
25BDCP implementing agencies shall consult with the council on
26these recommendations. These recommendations shall not change
27the terms and conditions of the permits issued by state and federal