BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1299|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1299
          Author:   Bradford (D)
          Amended:  9/4/13 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENERGY, UTIL. & COMMUNIC. COMMITTEE  :  8-2, 7/2/13
          AYES:  Padilla, Corbett, De Le�n, DeSaulnier, Hill, Pavley,  
            Wolk, Wright
          NOES:  Fuller, Knight
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cannella
           
          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 8/30/13
          AYES:  De Le�n, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NOES:  Walters, Gaines
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  58-17, 5/29/13 - See last page for vote


            SUBJECT  :    Telecommunications: universal service programs:   
                      California Advanced Services Fund

           SOURCE  :     California Emerging Technology Fund


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the Public Utilities Commission  
          (PUC) to fund grants for the deployment and adoption of  
          broadband services in publicly supported communities using the  
          Broadband Public Housing Account (Housing Account) established  
          within the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF), as  
          specified.

           ANALYSIS  :    
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1299
                                                                     Page  
          2


          Existing law:

           1. The federal Telecommunications Act of 1996:

              A.    Establishes a program of cooperative federalism for  
                the regulation of telecommunications to attain the goal of  
                local competition, while implementing specific,  
                predictable, and sufficient federal and state mechanisms  
                to preserve and advance universal service, consistent with  
                certain universal service principles.

              B.    States that the universal service principles include  
                the principle that consumers in all regions of the nation,  
                including low-income consumers and those in rural,  
                insular, and high-cost areas, should have access to  
                telecommunications and information services, including  
                interexchange services and advanced telecommunications and  
                information services, that are reasonably comparable to  
                those services provided in urban areas and that are  
                available at rates that are reasonably comparable to rates  
                charged for similar services in urban areas.

              C.    Authorizes each state to adopt regulations to provide  
                for additional definitions and standards to preserve and  
                advance universal service within the state, only to the  
                extent that they adopt additional specific, predictable,  
                and sufficient mechanisms that do not rely on or burden  
                federal universal service support mechanisms.

           1. States that the PUC has regulatory authority over public  
             utilities, including telephone corporations, as defined.

           2. Establishes the CASF in the State Treasury and requires that  
             monies in those funds are the proceeds of rates and are held  
             in trust for the benefit of ratepayers and to compensate  
             telephone corporations for their costs of providing universal  
             service and may be expended only to accomplish specified  
             telecommunications universal service programs, upon  
             appropriation in the annual Budget Act or upon supplemental  
             appropriation.

           3. Requires the PUC to develop, implement, and administer the  
             CASF to encourage deployment of high-quality advanced  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1299
                                                                     Page  
          3

             communications services to all Californians that will promote  
             economic growth, job creation, and substantial social  
             benefits of advanced information and communications  
             technologies, as provided in specified decisions of PUC and  
             in the CASF statute.

           4. Establishes three accounts, the Broadband Infrastructure  
             Grant Account (BIGA), the Rural and Urban Regional Broadband  
             Consortia Grant Account, and the Broadband Infrastructure  
             Revolving Loan Account within the CASF.

           5. Prohibits PUC from collecting, before January 1, 2011, more  
             than $100,000,000, for deposit into the CASF through the  
             surcharge authorized by the PUC. 

           6. Authorizes the PUC to collect an additional sum not to  
             exceed $125,000,000, after January 1, 2011, for a sum total  
             of monies collected through the surcharge not to exceed  
             $225,000,000 and authorizes the PUC to collect the additional  
             sum through the 2015 calendar year.

           7. Requires that of the monies collected after January 1, 2011,  
             $100,000,000 is to be deposited into the BIGA, $10,000,000 is  
             to be deposited into the Rural and Urban Regional Broadband  
             Consortia Grant Account and used for specified purposes, and  
             $15,000,000 is to be deposited into the Broadband  
             Infrastructure Revolving Loan Account and used for specified  
             purposes.

          This bill:

           1. Establishes the Housing Account within the CASF and  
             authorizes the PUC to transfer $20,000,000 from the BIGA and  
             $5,000,000 from the Broadband Revolving Loan Account to the  
             Housing Account if the PUC is otherwise authorized to collect  
             funds for purposes of the CASF in excess of the $225,000,000  
             the PUC is authorized to collect through December 31, 2015.

           2. Authorizes not more than $20,000,000 from the Housing  
             Account to be available for grants and loans to a publicly  
             supported community, as defined, to finance a project to  
             connect a broadband network to that publicly supported  
             community.


                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1299
                                                                     Page  
          4

           3. Authorizes not more than $5,000,000 from the Housing Account  
             be available for grants and loans to a publicly supported  
             community to support programs designed to increase adoption  
             rates for broadband services for residents of that publicly  
             supported community.

           4. Requires the PUC, in reviewing a project application to  
             consider the availability of other funding sources for that  
             project, any financial contribution from the broadband  
             service provider to the project, the availability of any  
             other public or private broadband adoption or deployment  
             program, including tax credits and other incentives, and  
             whether the applicant has sought funding from, or  
             participated in, any reasonably available program.

           5. Authorizes the PUC to require an applicant to provide match  
             funding, and prohibits the PUC from denying funding for a  
             project solely because the applicant is receiving funding  
             from another source.

          6. Defines "publicly subsidized" to mean either that the housing  
             development receives financial assistance from the United  
             States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)  
             pursuant to an annual contribution contract or is financed  
             with low-income housing tax credits, tax-exempt mortgage  
             revenue bonds, general obligation bonds, or local, state, or  
             federal loans or grants and the rents of the occupants, who  
             are lower income households, do not exceed those prescribed  
             by deed restrictions or regulatory agreements pursuant to the  
             terms of the financing or financial assistance.

          7. Defines "publicly supported community" to mean a publicly  
             subsidized multifamily housing development that is wholly  
             owned as specified. 

          8. States that this bill is contingent upon the successful  
             enactment of SB 740 (Padilla).

           Background
           
           CASF established  .  PUC established the CASF in 2007 to promote  
          broadband deployment statewide and to comply with state law  
          declaring that California's telecommunications policies include  
          closing the Digital Divide and assuring that all Californians  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1299
                                                                     Page  
          5

          have universal access to high-quality, state-of-the-art,  
          advanced telecommunications services.  SB 1193 (Padilla, Chapter  
          393, Statutes of 2008) codified the CASF program after the  
          California Broadband Task Force reported that about 1.4 million  
          (4%) of Californians lacked broadband and nearly 50% had only  
          low-speed Internet access.  The program provides grants and  
          loans for broadband infrastructure, with first priority for  
          projects for unserved areas that have no facilities-based  
          broadband service provider, and then for underserved areas,  
          where broadband is not available at benchmark speeds.

          SB 1193 authorized $100 million in funding for CASF from a  
          customer surcharge on intrastate communications service,  
          including landline, wireless and Voice over Internet Protocol  
          service.  SB 1040 (Padilla, Chapter 393, Statutes of 2010)  
          authorized another $125 million for the program, with  
          collections of no more than $25 million per year through 2015.   
          That bill also established a CASF revolving loan program as an  
          option for infrastructure costs not covered by a CASF grant and  
          specified some funding for urban and regional consortia for  
          non-capital costs of broadband deployment projects, with total  
          authorized funding of:

             $200 million for the BIGA;
             $15 million for the Broadband Infrastructure Revolving Loan  
             Account; and
             $10 million for the Rural and Urban Regional Broadband  
             Consortia Account.

           CASF eligibility  .  Consistent with existing law governing all  
          PUC public purpose programs, CASF funding is available only to a  
          "telephone corporation" regulated by the PUC.  However, AB 1555  
          (Perez, Chapter 24, Statutes of 2009) suspended this requirement  
          after enactment of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of  
          2009 (ARRA) so California applicants for ARRA broadband grants  
          could use CASF grants to meet the matching funds requirement.   
          In October 2012, in order to generate more projects for unserved  
          areas, the PUC proposed expanding eligibility for infrastructure  
          grants to commercial and nonprofit entities that are not  
          telephone corporations, such as Wireless Internet Service  
          Providers (WISPs).  Many of these entities have expressed  
          interest in providing broadband with unique plans and wireless  
          technologies that are viable for connection of end users in  
          hard-to-serve remote and rural areas where traditional telephone  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1299
                                                                     Page  
          6

          and cable service providers do not invest.  However, this  
          eligibility change requires statutory authorization similar to  
          that provided for ARRA broadband projects.  

          The PUC has already awarded about $49 million of CASF funds for  
          broadband projects, with an additional $240.6 million in pending  
          applications.  Some of these projects face challenges, and the  
          PUC currently is reviewing actual levels of broadband service in  
          project areas to determine what funding will be awarded.  On top  
          of whatever funding the PUC awards to pending applicants, an  
          additional amount of the funding already authorized for  
          broadband infrastructure would be required for projects of WISPs  
          and other entities made eligible if SB 740 is enacted. 

           Public Housing and the Digital Divide  .  On April 29, 2013, the  
          Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee held an informational  
          hearing on broadband availability for residents of California  
          public housing.  According to estimates from the PUC and  
          California Emerging Technology Fund (CETF), there are about  
          300,000 publicly subsidized housing units in California, of  
          which about 200,000 to 250,000 are estimated to lack broadband  
          connections.  Representatives from publicly-supported and  
          non-profit housing communities, situated primarily in urban  
          areas, testified that a majority of their properties lack  
          reliable broadband connectivity, citing the cost of building or  
          upgrading the infrastructure and maintaining the network and  
          inside wiring as the primary barrier to receiving broadband  
          service. Representatives of cable companies with facilities to  
          the curb near public housing buildings claim that in some cases  
          they have been denied access to public housing to install lines  
          that would enable service to individual units.

          There are currently a number of programs within the HUD that  
          public housing entities and in some cases nonprofit  
          organizations can potentially apply to for funding for broadband  
          deployment and adoption activities, including Neighborhood  
          Networks.  The California Tax Credit Allocation Committee  
          provides scoring points in the calculation of a tax credit for  
          low-income housing that includes free broadband for tenants.   
          Some of the California ARRA-funded broadband adoption projects  
          focus on low-income communities.  In addition, the Federal  
          Communications Commission, broadband service providers and  
          nonprofit organizations have implemented broadband adoption  
          programs such as Comcast Essentials and Connect2Compete that  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1299
                                                                     Page  
          7

          offer low-cost broadband to low-income users, along with digital  
          literacy activities.  CETF also has focused on broadband for  
          low-income housing, including efforts with the Housing Authority  
          of the City of Los Angeles.

           Comments
           
          According to the author's office, this bill will help bridge the  
          Digital Divide and advance California's policies to extend  
          broadband service to all California communities regardless of  
          their location or income.  This bill recognizes that bridging  
          the Digital Divide will require new public policy that  
          encourages investment in deployment and adoption of broadband  
          technology in publicly subsidized affordable housing  
          developments.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

             On-going costs of $150,000 from the Housing Account within  
             the CASF (special) for administrative costs to the PUC to  
             administer the program.

             Cost pressures of up to $25 million CASF for the redirection  
             of funds, which would be offset by additional surcharges  
             collected pursuant to SB 740.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/5/13)

          California Emerging Technology Fund (source)
          AT&T
          City and County of San Francisco
          Division of Ratepayer Advocates
          Public Utilities Commission

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  58-17, 5/29/13
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Ammiano, Atkins, Blumenfield,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Ch�vez, Chesbro, Cooley, Daly,  
            Dickinson, Eggman, Fong, Fox, Frazier, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez,  
            Gonzalez, Gordon, Gorell, Gray, Hagman, Hall, Roger Hern�ndez,  
            Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Lowenthal, Medina, Mitchell,  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1299
                                                                     Page  
          8

            Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Pan, Patterson, Perea, V. Manuel  
            P�rez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Salas, Skinner, Stone,  
            Ting, Weber, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. P�rez
          NOES:  Allen, Bigelow, Conway, Dahle, Donnelly, Beth Gaines,  
            Grove, Harkey, Jones, Logue, Maienschein, Mansoor, Melendez,  
            Morrell, Olsen, Wagner, Waldron
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bloom, Holden, Nestande, Wilk, Vacancy


          JG:k  9/5/13   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****































                                                                CONTINUED