BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1308 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 8, 2013 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Mike Gatto, Chair AB 1308 (Bonilla) - As Amended: March 21, 2013 Policy Committee: Business, Professions and Consumer Protection Vote: 11-0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill authorizes a midwife to directly obtain supplies, order testing, and receive reports necessary to midwifery practice; requires the Medical Board of California (MBC) to revise and adopt regulations defining the supervision requirements between a physician and a midwife; and requires a midwife to disclose arrangements for the referral of complications to a physician. FISCAL EFFECT Negligible state costs. MBC is already required by statute to adopt regulations. COMMENTS 1)Rationale . This bill seeks to clarify and facilitate the practice of midwifery. A licensed midwife is required by statute to practice under a physician's supervision. MBC adopted the Standards of Care for Midwifery in 2006 but the Board's efforts to promulgate regulations defining the level of supervision have not been successful. Licensed midwives face difficulty ordering supplies, ordering lab tests and receiving the results of those tests, because suppliers and labs often require the name of an ordering physician. By explicitly authorizing these functions in statute, one barrier faced by midwives will be removed. Addressing the regulations issued in statute is intended to restart discussions by creating a deadline for MBC to establish supervision guidelines. This bill also requires midwives to explicitly disclose to the patient the midwife's arrangements for AB 1308 Page 2 referral of complications to a physician. This bill is sponsored by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2)Long-standing problems with clarifying physician supervision requirements . According to MBC's 2012 Sunset Review Report, physician supervision is essentially unavailable to licensed midwives performing home births because California physicians are generally prohibited by their malpractice insurance companies from providing supervision of licensed midwives who perform home births. Existing law previously required MBC to adopt regulations by July 1, 2003 defining both the appropriate standard of care and the level of supervision required for the practice of midwifery. Due to its inability to reach a consensus on the supervision issue, MBC bifurcated this requirement, and in 2006 adopted the Standards of Care for Midwifery. MBC reported three previous attempts to resolve the physician supervision issue through legislation and/or regulation have been unsuccessful due to the widely divergent opinions of interested parties. Despite midwives' inability to obtain physician supervision, midwives are currently performing midwifery without sanction by MBC because administrative courts have determined it is unfair to enforce the physician supervision requirement when physician supervision is practically unobtainable. Analysis Prepared by : Debra Roth / APPR. / (916) 319-2081