BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1310
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1310 (Brown)
          As Amended May 24, 2013
          Majority vote 

           HEALTH              19-0        APPROPRIATIONS      17-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Pan, Logue, Ammiano,      |Ayes:|Gatto, Harkey, Bigelow,   |
          |     |Atkins, Bonilla, Bonta,   |     |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian  |
          |     |Chesbro, Gomez, Roger     |     |Calderon, Campos,         |
          |     |Hern�ndez, Lowenthal,     |     |Donnelly, Eggman, Gomez,  |
          |     |Maienschein, Mansoor,     |     |Hall, Ammiano, Linder,    |
          |     |Mitchell, Nazarian,       |     |Pan, Quirk, Wagner, Weber |
          |     |Nestande,                 |     |                          |
          |     |V. Manuel P�rez, Wagner,  |     |                          |
          |     |Wieckowski, Wilk          |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Revises provisions relating to the Medi-Cal pediatric  
          subacute care program.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Revises the definition of pediatric subacute to include a  
            person who requires treatment for one or more active complex  
            medical conditions, or requires the administration of one or  
            more technically complex treatments.

          2)Adds the following conditions to the ways in which medical  
            necessity for eligibility for pediatric subacute services may  
            be substantiated:

             a)   Dependence on complex wound care management, including  
               daily assessment or intervention by a licensed registered  
               nurse and daily dressing changes, wound packing,  
               debridement, negative pressure wound therapy, or a special  
               mattress; or, 

             b)   The patient has a medical condition and requires an  
               intensity of medical or skilled nursing care such that his  
               or her health care needs may be satisfied by placement in a  
               facility providing pediatric subacute care services, but,  
               in the absence of a facility providing pediatric subacute  
               care services, the only other inpatient care appropriate to  
               meet the patient's health care needs under the Medi-Cal  








                                                                  AB 1310
                                                                  Page  2


               program is in an acute care licensed hospital bed.

          3)Makes other technical and clarifying changes.

           EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the  
            Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), which provides  
            comprehensive health benefits to low-income children, their  
            parents or caretaker relatives, pregnant women, elderly, blind  
            or disabled persons, nursing home residents, and refugees who  
            meet specified eligibility criteria.

          2)Establishes a Medi-Cal subacute care program for eligible  
            individuals in health facilities that meet the subacute  
            criteria.

          3)Defines "pediatric subacute services" in the Medi-Cal program  
            as the health care services needed by a person under 21 years  
            of age who uses medical technology that compensates for the  
            loss of vital bodily functions. 

          4)Requires that medical necessity be substantiated by one of the  
            following:

             a)   Tracheostomy with dependence on mechanical ventilation  
               for a minimum of six hours each day;

             b)   Dependence on total parenteral nutrition or other  
               intravenous nutritional support and one of the following:

               i)     Dependence on tracheostomy care requiring suctioning  
                 at least every six hours and room air mist or oxygen; 

               ii)    Continuous intravenous therapy as specified;

               iii)   Peritoneal dialysis;

               iv)    Tube feeding;

               v)     Other medical technologies that require the services  
                 of a professional nurse; or,

               vi)    Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP), as  








                                                                  AB 1310
                                                                  Page  3


                 specified, and lacking cognitive or physical ability to  
                 protect the airway.

             c)   Dependence on tracheostomy care requiring suctioning at  
               least every six hours and room air mist or oxygen and one  
               of the conditions in 4) b) ii) through vi) above;

             d)   Dependence on skilled nursing care in the administration  
               of any three of 4) b) i) through vi) above; or, 

             e)   Dependence on BiPAP and Continuous Positive Airway  
               Pressure (CPAP), as specified, and one of the conditions in  
               4) b) i) through vi) above.

          5)Provides that the medical necessity standard is intended  
            solely to evaluate the potential eligibility of a patient for  
            pediatric subacute care who would otherwise be receiving acute  
            hospital care.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, likely costs of at least $50,000 General Fund  
          annually, depending on the extent to which definition changes  
          lead to an increase in the number of pediatric subacute care bed  
          days.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, this bill is needed because  
          the current definition of medical necessity has had the  
          unintended consequence of keeping some children in acute care  
          hospitals unnecessarily.  The author asserts that children  
          should be released to subacute care when appropriate and there  
          is no safe alternative at a lesser cost.  The author further  
          states that improvements to the definition of medical necessity  
          have been identified which accomplish this objective yet  
          maintain requirements for complexity of care, including  
          Registered Nurse and/or Respiratory Therapist interventions.  In  
          addition, the current law is interpreted in such a restrictive  
          way that children, who could benefit from subacute services  
          outside of the acute care hospital setting, must remain in the  
          hospital at a cost much higher than the cost of a subacute  
          pediatric care facility.

          AB 667 (Mitchell), Chapter 294, Statutes of 2011, codified and  
          updated the criteria used to evaluate and authorize admission  
          into Medi-Cal pediatric subacute facilities.  Until then, the  








                                                                  AB 1310
                                                                  Page  4


          criteria were in regulations adopted in 1989 and included a  
          limited number of specific qualifying conditions.  According to  
          DHCS, these regulations had never been updated to reflect  
          enhanced and improved technology such as BiPAP or CPAP which did  
          not exist at the time the criteria were developed.  These  
          devices are now commonly used as an alternative to a tracheotomy  
          and require careful supervision by skilled clinical staff,  
          particularly for young children with serious respiratory issues.  
           

          AB 36 (Quakenbush), Chapter 1030, Statutes of 1993, authorized  
          DHCS (formerly the Department of Health Services) to establish  
          cost-based reimbursement for the provision of Medi-Cal benefits  
          to any technology dependent child who is placed at a lower cost  
          facility, establishes the services required to be provided at  
          the facility and authorizes adoption of the regulations later  
          codified by AB 667.  AB 36 conditions implementation on federal  
          approval and full federal financial approval through the  
          Medi-Cal program.  AB 36 also included a January 1, 1996 repeal  
          date or alternatively, was repealed by its own terms after the  
          establishment of a pediatric service continuum, whichever was  
          earlier.  AB 36 contains legislative intent that in determining  
          placement and treatment needs of technology dependent children,  
          an effort should be made to place the child in the least costly  
          and least restrictive level of care that still provides for the  
          child's medical safety and dignity.  Daily reimbursement rates  
          for pediatric subacute facilities vary depending on the type of  
          the facility and whether the patient is ventilator dependent or  
          non-ventilator dependent.  Reimbursement rates for each facility  
          are established by the DHCS based on a model for pediatric  
          subacute facilities.  According to DHCS in 2011, the pediatric  
          inpatient acute rate was approximately $1,425 per day, whereas  
          the subacute ranged from $895 to $706 per day.

          AB 97 (Budget Committee), Chapter 3, Statutes of 2011, the  
          Omnibus Health Trailer Bill for 2011-12 enacted an overall 10%  
          Medi-Cal provider payment reduction, including to pediatric  
          subacute facilities.  DHCS conducted rate analyses and access  
          studies where necessary in order to obtain federal Centers for  
          Medicare and Medicaid Services approval.  On April 12, 2013, a  
          State Plan Amendment which requested that Medi-Cal  
          fee-for-service rates for freestanding pediatric subacute  
          facilities be frozen at the 2008-09 levels and the  
          implementation of a 5.75% payment reduction effective January 1,  








                                                                  AB 1310
                                                                  Page  5


          2012, was withdrawn after determining that access to pediatric  
          subacute care would be negatively impacted.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Marjorie Swartz / HEALTH / (916)  
          319-2097 


                                                                FN: 0001002