BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1358|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1358
          Author:   Fong (D)
          Amended:  7/11/13 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  7-2, 7/3/13
          AYES:  Liu, Block, Correa, Hancock, Hueso, Monning, Torres
          NOES:  Wyland, Huff
           
          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  4-1, 8/12/13
          AYES:  De Le�n, Hill, Lara, Steinberg
          NOES:  Gaines
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters, Padilla
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  46-25, 5/23/13 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Student body association:  student representation  
          fee

           SOURCE  :     Student Senate for California Community Colleges 


           DIGEST  :    This bill increases the current California Community  
          College (CCC) student representation fee (SRF) from $1 to $2 per  
          semester, subject to an affirmative majority vote (rather than  
          2/3) of a CCC's students and directs the additional $1 fee  
          increase to be expended on the establishment and support the  
          operations of a statewide CCC student organization, as  
          specified.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law permits the Board of Governors (BOG)  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1358
                                                                     Page  
          2

          of a CCC district to authorize the students of a college to  
          organize a student body association (SBA). 

          Existing law provides that a SBA may order an election be held  
          for the purpose of establishing a SRF of $1 per semester.  An  
          affirmative vote of 2/3 of the students voting in the election  
          shall be sufficient to establish the fee.  However, the number  
          of students who vote must equal or exceed the average number of  
          students who voted in the previous three student body elections.  
           The fee money collected shall be expended to provide support of  
          governmental affairs representatives who may be stating their  
          positions and viewpoints before city, county, and district  
          governments and before offices and agencies of state government.  
           Students may refuse to pay the fee for religious, political,  
          financial, or moral reasons.  The chief fiscal officer of the  
          CCC shall have custody of the fee money collected, but the funds  
          shall be disbursed to the SBA for the specified purposes.   
          Finally, the CCC district may retain a portion of the fees  
          collected that is equal to the actual cost of administering  
          these fees up to, but not more than, 7%.  
           
          This bill increases the current CCC SRF from $1 to $2 per  
          semester, subject to an affirmative majority vote (rather than  
          2/3) of a CCC's students and directs the additional $1 fee  
          increase to be expended on the establishment and support the  
          operations of a statewide CCC student organization, as  
          specified.  Specifically, this bill:

           1. Clarifies that current and prospective SRF revenue may be  
             expended on local or statewide SBAs.

           2. Authorizes a SBA to call campus-wide elections to determine  
             whether to assess a SRF of $2 per semester.

           3. Reduces the affirmative vote from 2/3 to a majority of the  
             students voting in the election, as specified, to establish  
             the SRF.

           4. Specifies that $1 of every $2 fee collected shall be  
             expended to establish and support the operations of an  
             independent statewide CCC student organization that is  
             recognized by the BOG of the CCCs, with governmental affairs  
             representatives to advocate before the Legislature and other  
             state and local governmental entities.  Specifies this  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1358
                                                                     Page  
          3

             provision only applies to SRFs adopted on or after January 1,  
             2014.

           5. States that any CCC SBA that has adopted a SRF before  
             January 1, 2014 retains authority to continue to receive the  
             $1 fee as authorized prior to enactment of this bill.  The  
             SBA may conduct an election to adopt a revised SRF - if the  
             students pass the revised SRF, then $1 of every $2 collected  
             shall be expended for purposes, as specified.
           6. Specifies requirements for the statewide community college  
             student organization, if formed, including that it:  (a) is  
             established as a legal entity registered with the Secretary  
             of State; (b) demonstrates compliance with all applicable  
             state and federal laws and reporting requirements; (c)  
             exercises prudent fiscal management by establishing generally  
             accepted accounting controls and procedures; (d) completes an  
             annual independent financial audit, the results of which  
             shall be annually provided to the BOG for review; (e) opens  
             its meetings to the public and complies with the requirements  
             of the Public Records Act.

           7. Requires the CCC district to annually prepare a summary of  
             all revenue collected from the SRF and the expenditures of  
             the proceeds.  The summary shall be presented at the CCC  
             district board meeting each year and posted to the CCC  
             district Internet Web site. 

           8. Permits a CCC district to retain a portion of the fees  
             collected that is equal to the actual cost of administering  
             these fees up to, but not more than, 7%.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

              Revenue  .  Potentially significant additional revenue, to the  
             extent that the student representation fee is increased on  
             various community college campuses.  That revenue would be  
             primarily earmarked to fund the statewide student  
             organization.

              Administrative fees  .  This bill allows the CCC Chancellor's  
             Office (CCCCO) to reimburse itself for any administrative  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1358
                                                                     Page  
          4

             expenses from the fee revenue.  It further allows a CCC  
             district which collects the increased fee to reimburse itself  
             for the actual costs of fee administration, up to 7% of the  
             fee, which the CCCCO has opined will be sufficient to cover  
             its costs (and is above the current allowable rate for the  
             existing fee it collects).

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/14/13)

          Student Senate for California Community Colleges (source)
          Associated Students of Coast College
          Associated Students of El Camino College
          Associated Students of Los Angeles Trade Technical College
          Associated Students of Modesto Junior College
          Associated Students of Napa Valley College
          Associated Students of Pasadena City College
          California Community College Association of Student Trustees
          California Federation of Teachers
          California School Employees Association
          California State Student Association
          California Teachers Association
          Coast Community College District Student Council
          Faculty Association of California Community Colleges
          Los Angeles Trade Technical Colleges
          San Jose City College Student Senate
          San Jose/Evergreen Valley College
          Santa Rosa Junior College Associated Students
          Student Senate for California Community Colleges Regions 4 and 7
          Student Trustee of Napa Valley College
          University of California Student Association

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/14/13)

          Community College League of California

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  46-25, 5/23/13
          AYES:  Alejo, Ammiano, Atkins, Bloom, Blumenfield, Bocanegra,  
            Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon,  
            Campos, Chau, Chesbro, Daly, Dickinson, Eggman, Fong, Frazier,  
            Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gordon, Gray, Hall, Roger Hern�ndez,  
            Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Lowenthal, Medina, Mitchell, Mullin,  
            Nazarian, Pan, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Skinner, Stone, Ting,  
            Weber, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. P�rez
          NOES:  Achadjian, Allen, Bigelow, Ch�vez, Conway, Cooley, Dahle,  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1358
                                                                     Page  
          5

            Donnelly, Beth Gaines, Gorell, Hagman, Harkey, Linder, Logue,  
            Maienschein, Mansoor, Melendez, Morrell, Nestande, Olsen,  
            Patterson, V. Manuel P�rez, Quirk-Silva, Wagner, Wilk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Fox, Grove, Holden, Jones, Muratsuchi, Salas,  
            Waldron, Vacancy, Vacancy


          PQ:k  8/14/13   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****

































                                                                CONTINUED