BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






                 Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations
                              William W. Monning, Chair

          Date of Hearing: June 12, 2013               2013-2014 Regular  
          Session                              
          Consultant: Deanna D. Ping                   Fiscal:Yes
                                                       Urgency: No
          
                                  Bill No: AB 1384
                     Author: Committee on Labor and Employment 
                            As Introduced: March 4, 2013
          

                                       SUBJECT
          
                       Garment manufacturing: civil penalties 


                                      KEY ISSUE

          Should the legislature establish penalties for a garment  
          manufacturer who fails to display specified information at the  
          front entrance of the business, as required by existing law? 

                                      ANALYSIS
          
           Existing law  requires every person engaged in the business of  
          garment manufacturing to register with the Labor Commissioner  
          and meet other specified requirements. (Labor Code �2675)
           
          Existing law  requires every person registered as a garment  
          manufacturer to display his or her name, address, and garment  
          manufacturing number on the front of his or her business, as  
          specified. (Labor Code �2676.5) 
           
          Existing law  authorizes the Labor Commissioner to waive this  
          requirement if he or she finds compliance to be infeasible due  
          to the design or layout of the business premises. 
          (Labor Code �2676.5)

           
          This bill  establishes civil penalties for a garment manufacturer  
          who fails to display specified information at the front entrance  
          of the business, as required by existing law.  

          Specifically,  this bill  :  










          1)Provides that any person who fails to comply with the  
            requirement will be subject to a civil penalty of $100 per  
            calendar day that the person engages or has engaged in garment  
            manufacturing. 

          2)Provides for a penalty of $200 per day for any subsequent  
            citation.

          3)Provides that the procedures for issuing, contesting and  
            enforcing citations and judgments for the civil penalties will  
            be the same as under those available for labor law violations.


                                      COMMENTS
          
          1.  Need for this bill?

            In 1980 the California Legislature passed the Garment  
            Manufacturing Act - which enacted various provisions to  
            protect the wages and the health and safety standards in the  
            garment industry. The Act included such provisions as a  
            requirement for industry employers to register with the Labor  
            Commissioner, demonstrate adequate character, competency, and  
            responsibility. Almost ten years later a new section of Labor  
            Code was added requiring registered garment manufacturers to  
            display his or her name, address, and registration number on  
            the front entrance of the business. 

            According to the author's office, the posted information is  
            intended to help both garment workers and the Labor  
            Commissioner identify the name and address of garment  
            companies that violate labor laws, however there is no civil  
            penalty specified for violations of this requirement. This  
            bill would establish civil penalties for a garment  
            manufacturer who fails to display the information required by  
            existing law. 

          2.  Proponent Arguments  :
            
            Proponents argue that compliance with the posting requirements  
            is an important mechanism to achieve transparency in the  
          Hearing Date:  June 12, 2013                             AB 1384  
          Consultant: Deanna D. Ping                               Page 2

          Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations 
          








            apparel industry, as it serves to provide basic information to  
            garment workers about the companies for whom they perform  
            labor. They contend that in an industry dominated by labor  
            contractors who often try to conceal their true business  
            identity, it is appropriate that there be significant  
            sanctions against those who engage in these practices,  
            especially since the obscured information prevents workers  
            from seeking redress for labor law violations. Lastly,  
            proponents argue that the bill is necessary to ensure that  
            garment companies no longer take advantage of the lack for  
            civil penalties for non-compliance with the posting  
            requirements. 

          3.  Opponent Arguments  :

            None on file. 


                                       SUPPORT
          
          California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
          

                                     OPPOSITION
          
          None on file.















          Hearing Date:  June 12, 2013                             AB 1384  
          Consultant: Deanna D. Ping                               Page 3

          Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations