Amended in Assembly April 30, 2013

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 1404


Introduced by Committee on Judiciary (Wieckowski (Chair), Alejo, Chau, Dickinson, Garcia, Muratsuchi, and Stone)

March 12, 2013


An act to repeal and add Section 841 of the Civil Code, relating to real property.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1404, as amended, Committee on Judiciary. Real property: boundaries.

Existing law defines the rights and obligations of owners of real property. Under existing law, coterminous owners are equally bound to maintain the boundaries between their properties. Existing law further requires coterminous owners to maintain fences between their properties, except as specified.

This bill wouldbegin insert,end insert insteadbegin insert,end insert requirebegin delete adjacentend deletebegin insert adjoiningend insert landowners to share equallybegin insert, with certain exceptions,end insert the responsibility for maintaining the boundaries and monuments between them. The bill would establish a presumption thatbegin delete adjacentend deletebegin insert adjoiningend insert landowners share an equal benefit from any fence dividing their properties and, absent abegin delete lawfulend deletebegin insert writtenend insert agreement to the contrary, are equally responsible for the reasonable costs for the fence, as specified.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1begin insert

begin insertSECTION 1.end insert  

end insert

begin insertThis act shall be known, and may be cited, as the
2Good Neighbor Fence Act of 2013.end insert

3

begin deleteSECTION 1.end delete
4begin insertSEC. 2.end insert  

Section 841 of the Civil Code is repealed.

5

begin deleteSEC. 2.end delete
6begin insertSEC. 3.end insert  

Section 841 is added to the Civil Code, to read:

7

841.  

(a) begin deleteAdjacent end deletebegin insertAdjoining end insertlandowners shall share equally
8in the responsibility for maintaining the boundaries and monuments
9between them.

10(b) begin deleteAdjacent end deletebegin insert(1)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertAdjoining end insertlandowners are presumed to share
11an equal benefit from any fence dividing their properties and,
12begin delete absent a lawful agreement to the contrary,end deletebegin insert unless otherwise agreed
13to by the parties in a written agreement,end insert
shall be presumed to be
14equally responsible for the reasonable costs of construction,
15maintenance,begin delete andend deletebegin insert orend insert necessary replacement of the fence.

begin insert

16(2) Where a landowner intends to incur costs for a fence
17described in paragraph (1), the landowner shall give 30 days’
18prior written notice to each affected adjoining landowner. The
19notice shall include notification of the presumption of equal
20responsibility for the reasonable costs of construction,
21maintenance, or necessary replacement of the fence. The notice
22shall include a description of the nature of the problem facing the
23shared fence, the proposed solution for addressing the problem,
24the estimated construction or maintenance costs involved to
25address the problem, the proposed cost sharing approach, and the
26proposed timeline for getting the problem addressed.

end insert
begin insert

27(3) The presumption in paragraph (1) may be overcome by a
28preponderance of the evidence demonstrating that imposing equal
29responsibility for the reasonable costs of construction,
30maintenance, or necessary replacement of the fence would be
31unjust. In determining whether equal responsibility for the
32reasonable costs would be unjust, the court shall consider all of
33the following:

end insert
begin insert

34(A) Whether the financial burden to one landowner is
35substantially disproportionate to the benefit conferred upon that
36landowner by the fence in question.

end insert
begin insert

37(B) Whether the cost of the fence would exceed the difference
38in the value of the real property before and after its installation.

end insert
begin insert

P3    1(C) Whether the financial burden to one landowner would
2impose an undue financial hardship given that party’s financial
3circumstances as demonstrated by reasonable proof.

end insert
begin insert

4(D) The reasonableness of a particular construction or
5maintenance project, including all of the following:

end insert
begin insert

6(i) The extent to which the costs of the project appear to be
7unnecessary or excessive.

end insert
begin insert

8(ii) The extent to which the costs of the project appear to be the
9result of the landowner’s personal aesthetic, architectural, or other
10preferences.

end insert
begin insert

11(E) Any other equitable factors appropriate under the
12circumstances.

end insert
begin insert

13(4) Where a party rebuts the presumption in paragraph (1) by
14a preponderance of the evidence, the court shall, in its discretion,
15consistent with the party’s circumstances, order either a
16contribution of less than an equal share for the costs of
17construction, maintenance, or necessary replacement of the fence,
18or order no contribution.

end insert
begin insert

19(c) For the purposes of this section, the following terms have
20the following meanings:

end insert
begin insert

21(1) “Landowner” means a private person or entity that lawfully
22holds any possessory interest in real property, and does not include
23a city, city and county, district, public corporation, or other
24political subdivision, public body, or public agency.

end insert
begin insert

25(2) “Adjoining” means contiguous to or in contact with.

end insert


O

    98