BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó
                                                                AB 1409
                                                                Page  1
        CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
        AB 1409 (Bradford)
        As Amended  September 6, 2013
        2/3 vote. Urgency
         
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |ASSEMBLY: |50-21|(May 16, 2013)  |SENATE: |31-0 |(September 11, 2013) |
        |          |     |                |        |     |                     |
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          
         
         ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
        |COMMITTEE VOTE:  |14-0 |(September 11,      |RECOMMENDATION: |concur    |
        |(U. & C.)        |     |2013)               |                |          |
         ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
        Original Committee Reference:    U. & C.  
         SUMMARY  :  Corrects incorrect code references in statute and revises  
        the statutory cap on fees necessary to obtain a certificate of  
        public convenience and necessity (CPCN) from the California Public  
        Utilities Commission (PUC) to adjust for inflation.  Specifically,  
         this bill  :  
        1)Corrects incorrect code references to code sections that were  
          moved or repealed as a result of
          other enacted statutes.
        2)Allows PUC to adjust for inflation the fee required to obtain a  
          CPCN.
         The Senate amendments  :
         
         1)Specify the filing fee is reestablished at $500 and allow the PUC  
          to adjust this fee in the future only according to the Consumer  
          Price Index (CPI). 
        2)Clarify that all fees are to be deposited in the Public Utilities  
          Commission Utilities Reimbursement Account.
        3)Delete sections related to incorrect code references.
        4)Provide that the PUC shall adopt rules applicable to all lifeline  
          services providers, including providers using alternative  
                                                                AB 1409
                                                                Page  2
          technologies.
        5)Specify that the PUC may not deny a request to be designated as  
          an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) or a state lifeline  
          provider based on the entity providing any Voice over Internet  
          Protocol (VoIP) or Internet Protocol (IP) enabled service.
        6)Provide that Commission shall not deny or revoke a CPCN for a  
          telephone corporation that provide retail or wholesale service on  
          the grounds that the carrier also provide VoIP service or any  
          other unregulated service.
        7)Allow reimbursement for non-telephone corporations providing  
          Lifeline service from the Universal Lifeline Telephone Service  
          Trust Administrative Committee Fund.
         FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations Committee,  
        potential minor revenue increases in the low tens of thousands of  
        dollars to the Public Utilities Commission Utilities Reimbursement  
        Account (special) for increased fee revenues on CPCN applications.
         COMMENTS :  This is a committee bill which revises incorrect code  
        references in statute and revises the statutory cap on fees  
        necessary to obtain a CPCN from PUC.
         1)CPCN fee adjustment  :  The $75 fee to file an application for a  
          CPCN for telephone corporations and other utilities except for  
          passenger state corporations, and for the mortgage, lease,  
          transfer, or assignment of a CPCN has been in statute since 1969.  
           The cost of CPCN application has not adjusted for inflation.   
          According to PUC, the CPI has increased 530.5% since 1969.  If  
          the application fee had been adjusted for inflation, using CPI  
          calculator, the fee would be approximately $473.  Currently, PUC  
          does not have the authority to raise the fee unless there is a  
          change in statute through legislative action, thus the creating  
          the need for this bill.  
          The current CPCN application fee does not reflect the current  
          cost of PUC resources required to process the application.  The  
          application requires extensive review and evaluation by an  
          Administrative Law Judge, is assigned to the Communications  
          Division to review tariffs and other technical aspects of the  
          application.  Hearings may be required due to protest filed by  
                                                                AB 1409
                                                                Page  3
          other parties, or other issues or by PUC's Consumer Protection  
          and Safety Division, or a California Environmental Quality Act  
          review if the applicant is proposing to build facilities.   
          Depending on the initial review, PUC staff may require the  
          applicant to submit additional information.
        2)Legislation adopted in 2010 directed the PUC to develop rules to  
          expand technology options for consumers receiving service under  
          the More Universal Service Lifeline Program.  The PUC has yet to  
          develop those rules.  The bill would also provide that all  
          lifeline providers, including those that are non-telephone  
          corporations, may be reimbursed for lifeline service from the  
          Universal Lifeline Telephone Service Trust Administrative  
          Committee Fund. 
          This bill directs the PUC to develop rules governing the offering  
          of lifeline service for all providers of voice services using  
          alternative technologies. 
          In addition, this bill clarifies statute by stating that:
           a)   The PUC may not deny a request to be designated to receive  
             federal lifeline support on the basis of the technology used  
             to provide lifeline service nor may they deny or revoke a CPCN  
             or authorization to provide telecommunications services based  
             on the fact that the telecommunications provider also provides  
             VoIP or IP-enabled services. 
           b)   The PUC may not, in exercising its authority to carry out  
             the state lifeline program or to designate a provider an  
             eligible telecommunications carrier, deny a request based on  
             the provider utilizing any VoIP or IP-enable service.  Under  
             federal law, a provider must be designated as an ETC by the  
             state regulatory agency in order to participate in the federal  
             lifeline program.  Although current state and federal law  
             provides the PUC with the proper authority to designate a  
             provider an ETC, regardless of the technology used to provide  
             the service, the PUC has delayed its ETC designation for any  
             provider that uses VoIP technologies, even where the provider  
             already provides telecommunications services and has been  
             properly certificated by the PUC.
           c)   The PUC may neither deny nor revoke a telephone  
             corporation's CPCN on the grounds that the carrier also  
             provides VoIP or other unregulated service.  While many  
                                                                AB 1409
                                                                Page  4
             providers have been providing service with the use of more  
             than one technology for years, the PUC has recently question a  
             carrier's ability to obtain a CPCN if it uses a technology  
             that is not regulated by the PUC. 
         Analysis Prepared by  :    DaVina Flemings / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083  
                                                                FN: 0002836