BILL ANALYSIS �
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1420|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CONSENT
Bill No: AB 1420
Author: Assembly Accountability and Administrative Review
Committee
Amended: 7/11/13 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE : 11-0, 6/25/13
AYES: Wright, Nielsen, Berryhill, Calderon, Cannella, Correa,
De Le�n, Galgiani, Hernandez, Lieu, Padilla
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 74-0, 5/23/13 (Consent) - See last page for
vote
SUBJECT : State government: state agencies: reports
SOURCE : Author
DIGEST : This bill eliminates and modifies certain state
agencies reporting requirements to the Legislature, Governor and
other state agencies in order to address conflicts with certain
provisions of SB 71 (Leno, Chapter 728, Statutes of 2012) which
eliminated a number of obsolete reporting requirements for state
agencies and departments.
ANALYSIS : Existing law requires or requests various state and
local entities to submit reports on specified topics to the
Legislature, the Governor, or both and directs Legislative
Counsel to prepare and publish a list of all the reports that
CONTINUED
AB 1420
Page
2
state and local agencies are required to submit.
This bill eliminates and modifies certain state agencies'
reporting requirements to the Legislature, Governor and other
state agencies in order to address conflicts with certain
provisions of SB 71 (Leno, Chapter 728, Statutes of 2012) which
eliminated a number of obsolete reporting requirements for state
agencies and departments.
Comments
The author's office notes that SB 71 (Leno, Chapter 728,
Statutes of 2012) eliminated over 200 reporting requirements
that were vetted through public hearings and other stakeholder
input and deemed appropriate to eliminate. Additionally, SB 71
stipulated that any bill that took effect on or before January
1, 2013, that affected any provision of SB 71, prevailed over SB
71. As a result, SB 71 had many provisions that were chaptered
out by other bills. This bill is simply intended to re-repeal
and/or amend the chaptered-out provisions of SB 71 of last year.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: No
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 74-0, 5/23/13
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Bigelow, Bloom,
Blumenfield, Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown,
Buchanan, Ian Calderon, Campos, Chau, Ch�vez, Chesbro, Conway,
Cooley, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox,
Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gordon, Gorell,
Gray, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hern�ndez, Jones-Sawyer,
Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Mansoor,
Medina, Melendez, Mitchell, Morrell, Mullin, Muratsuchi,
Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, V. Manuel
P�rez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Salas, Skinner, Stone,
Ting, Wagner, Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, John
A. P�rez
NO VOTE RECORDED: Grove, Holden, Jones, Waldron, Vacancy,
Vacancy
MW:k 8/12/13 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: NONE RECEIVED
AB 1420
Page
3
**** END ****