BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






                                                       Bill No:  AB  
          1426
          
                 SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
                       Senator Roderick D. Wright, Chair
                           2013-2014 Regular Session
                                 Staff Analysis


          AB 1426  Author:  Committee on Governmental Organization
          As Introduced:  March 21, 2013
          Hearing Date:  June 11, 2013
          Consultant:  Art Terzakis


                                    SUBJECT  
                                 Tribal Gaming

                                   DESCRIPTION
           
          AB 1426 reorganizes statutes pertaining to Indian gaming  
          compacts primarily by moving them to a newly created Title  
          16.5 on Tribal Gaming in the Government Code.  AB 1426 also  
          makes other minor, technical, nonsubstantive changes to  
          these provisions.

                                   EXISTING LAW

           Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of  
          1988, provides for the negotiation and execution of  
          compacts for the purpose of authorizing class III gaming on  
          Indian lands within a state.  Additionally, the California  
          Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and  
          conclude compacts, subject to ratification by the  
          Legislature.

          Existing law establishes the Indian Gaming Special  
          Distribution Fund (SDF) in the State Treasury for the  
          receipt of revenue contributions made by tribal governments  
          pursuant to the terms of the 1999 model Tribal-State Gaming  
          Compacts (compacts).

          Existing law authorizes the Legislature to appropriate  
          money from the SDF as follows: (1) Grants for programs  
          designed to address gambling addiction; (2) Grants for the  
          support of state and local government agencies impacted by  




          AB 1426 (Committee on Governmental Organization) continued   
                                        Page 2
          


          tribal government gaming; (3) Compensation for regulatory  
          costs incurred by the California Gambling Control  
          Commission (CGCC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) in  
          connection with the implementation and administration of  
          compacts; (4) Payment of shortfalls that may occur in the  
          Indian Gaming Revenue Sharing Trust Fund (RSTF); (5)  
          Disbursements for the purpose of implementing the terms of  
          tribal labor relations ordinances promulgated in accordance  
          with the terms of the 1999 compacts; and, (6) Any other  
          purpose specified by law.
            
          Existing law provides that the priority for funding from  
          the SDF is in the following descending order: (1) To make  
          payments of any shortfalls that may occur in the RSTF; (2)  
          Grants for programs designed to address gambling addiction;  
          (3) Compensation to the CGCC and DOJ for regulatory  
          functions that directly relates to Indian gaming; and, (4)  
          Grants for the support of local government agencies  
          impacted by tribal gaming.
           
           Existing law establishes the RSTF in the State Treasury for  
          the receipt and deposit of moneys derived from gaming  
          device license fees paid by Indian tribes with 1999  
          compacts.  Money in that fund is available to the CGCC,  
          upon appropriation by the Legislature, for distribution to  
          non-compact tribes, according to the terms of the compacts.  
           

          Existing law requires the CGCC to annually determine the  
          aggregate amount necessary to make up the difference  
          between $1.1 million and the actual amount paid to each  
          eligible recipient Indian tribe during the Fiscal Year from  
          the RSTF.  The CGCC must report the amount of the  
          deficiency to the Budget Committees in each house of the  
          Legislature.  Upon appropriation by the Legislature, the  
          CGCC shall make payments to eligible recipient tribes, as  
          specified.  
           
                                    BACKGROUND
           
           Purpose of AB 1426:   This measure is a code maintenance  
          proposal that was developed in consultation with the  
          Legislative Counsel's office to consolidate all of the laws  
          related to Indian gaming into one stand-alone Title in the  
          Government Code.





          AB 1426 (Committee on Governmental Organization) continued   
                                        Page 3
          


          Currently, Indian gaming laws are found in two separate  
          chapters in the Government Code.  Government Code Title 2,  
          Part 2, Chapter 1, Article 1 contains laws related to: (1)  
          Tribal-State Gaming Compacts, (2) the Indian Gaming Revenue  
          Sharing Trust Fund (RSTF), (3) the Indian Gaming Special  
          Distribution Fund (SDF); and (4) the methodology for the  
          backfill of shortfalls in revenues in the RSTF from the  
          SDF.  Government Code Title 2, Part 2, Chapter 7.5 contains  
          the laws related to Grants of Indian Gaming Revenue to  
          Local Government Agencies.  AB 1426 is a code maintenance  
          proposal that will consolidate all Indian gaming related  
          laws into one stand-alone Title in the Government Code,  
          namely, Title 16.5 - Tribal Gaming.  

                            PRIOR/RELATED LEGISLATION
           
           AB 2695 (Governmental Organization) 2011-12 Session.  Would  
          have reorganized statutes pertaining to Indian gaming  
          compacts primarily by moving them to a newly created Title  
          16.5 on Tribal Gaming in the Government Code.  Also would  
          have made other minor, technical changes to these  
          provisions.  (Died on Senate inactive file)
           
          AB 1417 (Governmental Organization), Chapter 736, Statutes  
          of 2011.   As introduced, this measure would have  
          reorganized statutes pertaining to Indian gaming compacts  
          primarily by moving them to a newly created Title 16.5 on  
          Tribal Gaming in the Government Code.  AB 1417 was  
          subsequently gutted in this committee to become the vehicle  
          for the distribution of $9.1 million from the SDF to the  
          CGCC to provide grants to local agencies. 
           
          SB 827 (Governmental Organization) 2009-10 Session.   Would  
          have established a stand-alone article within the  
          Government Code for compacts.  (Gutted and amended in the  
          Assembly)
           AB 2794 (Governmental Organization) 2009-10 Session.   Would  
          have established a stand-alone article within the  
          Government Code for compacts.  (Died at Senate Desk)
           
          AB 3072 (Governmental Organization) 2007-2008 Session  .   
          Would have established a stand-alone article within the  
          Government Code for compacts.  (Gutted and amended on the  
          Senate Floor)
          
           AB 1275 (J. Horton) 2003-2004 Session  .  Would have  




          AB 1426 (Committee on Governmental Organization) continued   
                                        Page 4
          


          established a stand-alone chapter within the Government  
          Code for compacts.  (Died on Senate Third Reading file)
          
           AB 2286 (J. Horton) 2001-2002 Session  .  Would have  
          established a stand-alone chapter within the Government  
          Code for compacts enacted and approved under Proposition  
          1A.  (Died on Senate Inactive file)
          
           SUPPORT:   None on file as of June 7, 2013.

           OPPOSE:   None on file as of June 7, 2013.

           FISCAL COMMITTEE:   No.

                                   **********