BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1427|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                       CONSENT


          Bill No:  AB 1427
          Author:   Assembly Local Government Committee
          Amended:  4/30/13 in Assembly
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 6/12/13
          AYES:  Wolk, Knight, Beall, DeSaulnier, Emmerson, Liu
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Hernandez

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  70-0, 5/16/13 (Consent) - See last page for  
            vote


           SUBJECT  :    Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government  
          Reorganization Act of
                      2000

           SOURCE  :     California Association of Local Agency Formation  
          Commissions


           DIGEST  :    This bill proposes eight, minor, non-controversial  
          changes to laws affecting local government organization and  
          reorganization.

           ANALYSIS  :    The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government  
          Reorganization Act delegates the Legislature's power to control  
          the boundaries of cities and special districts to local agency  
          formation commissions (LAFCOs).  

          This bill makes changes to state laws affecting LAFCOs and local  
          governments' boundaries. 
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1427
                                                                     Page  
          2


           1.Independent vs. dependent special district definition  .   
            Existing law defines an "independent district" or "independent  
            special district" to include any special district that has a  
            legislative body, whose members are elected by registered  
            voters or landowners within the district or whose members are  
            appointed to fixed terms.

            This bill clarifies that difference between an independent  
            district and a dependent district.  

           2.Landowner definition  .  Existing law defines a "landowner" as  
            any of the following:

                 A person shown as the landowner on the last equalized  
               assessment roll by the county at the time the determination  
               is required to be made;

                 Any person shown in the recorded written agreement of  
               sale as the purchase; or

                 Any public agency owning land other than highways,  
               rights-of-way, easements, waterways, or canals.

            This bill adds the plural forms of "person" in the definition.

           1.Independent special district selection committee  .  Existing  
            law specifies the makeup, meeting requirements, and election  
            proceedings of an independent special district selection  
            committee.  Existing law also requires that the selection  
            committee to appoint two regular members and one alternate  
            member to the commission.

            This bill clarifies that appointed and elected commissioners  
            are members of an independent special district's legislative  
            body.  

           2.Santa Clara County  .  Santa Clara County has special provisions  
            regarding reorganization proposals.  Existing law prohibits  
            the LAFCO from reviewing a reorganization that includes an  
            annexation to any city in Santa Clara County that is within  
            the urban service area of the city and the annexation is  
            initiated by resolution.  Instead, the city council must be  
            the conducting authority for the reorganization and must make  







                                                                    AB 1427
                                                                     Page  
          3

            specified findings in adopting a resolution approving the  
            reorganization.

            This bill clarifies that this provision of law applies to city  
            annexations and reorganizations involving city annexations.  

           3.Petitions for a merger of a district  .  Existing law specifies  
            procedures for petitions for a merger or establishment of a  
            subsidiary district.

            This bill corrects the typo, "resident voter district," to  
            "registered voter district."

           4.Protest hearing notice  .  Existing law requires a LAFCO  
            executive office to give notice of the protest hearing, and  
            sets forth procedures for those notice requirements.  A  
            protest hearing must be held within 60 days from the date  
            specified for the hearing in the notice.  If inhabited  
            territory is proposed to be annexed to a city with more than  
            100,000 residents in the County of Los Angeles, the protest  
            hearing date must be at least 90 days, but not more than 105  
            days, after the adoption date of the resolution initiating the  
            proceeding.

            This bill repeals the extended protest period. 

           5.Dissolution  .  Existing law sets forth procedures for a  
            dissolution.

            This bill corrects a wording error, changing "consolidation"  
            to "dissolution" in the relevant section.

           6.Election location  .  For a change of organization or  
            reorganization that is subject to voter confirmation, a LAFCO  
            must determine where the election will be held.

            This bill deletes an obsolete cross-reference and replaces it  
            with the proper code section. 

           Comments
           
          According to the Senate Governance and Finance Committee  
          analysis, even the best written statutes contain minor flaws.   
          When statutory problems appear in the state law affecting  







                                                                    AB 1427
                                                                     Page  
          4

          LAFCOs, the Assembly Local Government Committee avoids  
          legislative costs by combining several changes to the state laws  
          into a single, consensus bill.  By carefully reviewing each item  
          with the affected parties, the Committee also avoids  
          controversy.  The changes made by this bill do not raise  
          statewide policy questions.  This bill makes a complex statute  
          easier for property owners, residents, and local officials to  
          use.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No   Local:  
           No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/12/13)

          California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions  
          (source) 
          Association of California Water Agencies
          Riverside LAFCO
          San Bernardino LAFCO
          San Diego LAFCO



           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  70-0, 5/16/13
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Ammiano, Atkins, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Blumenfield, Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Fong, Fox, Frazier, Garcia,  
            Gatto, Gomez, Gordon, Gorell, Gray, Hagman, Hall, Harkey,  
            Roger Hernández, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue,  
            Lowenthal, Maienschein, Mansoor, Medina, Mitchell, Mullin,  
            Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea,  
            V. Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Salas, Skinner,  
            Ting, Torres, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk,  
            Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Allen, Buchanan, Eggman, Beth Gaines, Grove,  
            Holden, Melendez, Morrell, Stone, Vacancy


          AB:nl  6/13/13   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****







                                                                    AB 1427
                                                                     Page  
          5