BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó







                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY
                            Senator Loni Hancock, Chair              A
                             2013-2014 Regular Session               B

                                                                     1
                                                                     4
                                                                     3
          AB 1432 (Gatto)                                            2
          As Amended May 23, 2014 
          Hearing date:  June 24, 2014
          Education and Penal Codes
          AA:sl

                           MANDATORY CHILD ABUSE REPORTING:

                                  SCHOOL EMPLOYEES  


                                       HISTORY

          Source:  Author

          Prior Legislation: None

          Support: As noted in Senate Education Committee June 17th  
          analysis:  California Catholic     Conference, Inc.; California  
          Federation of Teachers; California Police Chiefs  Association;  
          California School Employees Association; California State PTA;  
          California Teachers Association; Child Abuse Listening,  
          Interviewing &           Coordination Center; Child Abuse  
          Prevention Center; Crime Victims United of   California;  
          EdVoice; Hillsides; Keenan & Associates; Los Angeles County  
          Office                                                      of  
          Education; Los Angeles Unified School District; National  
          Association of Social    Workers; Northern California Regional  
          Liability Excess Fund; Schools     Association For Excess Risk  
          JPA; Southern California Regional Liability Excess     Fund;  
          Statewide Association of Community Colleges; Superintendent of  
          Public   Instruction; StudentsFirst; United Teachers Los Angeles

          Opposition:None known

          Assembly Floor Vote:  Ayes 66 - Noes 5

                                                                     (More)






                                                            AB 1432 (Gatto)
                                                                     Page 2





                                         KEY ISSUE
           
          SHOULD SCHOOLS BE REQUIRED TO ANNUALLY TRAIN THEIR EMPLOYEES AND  
          OTHERS WORKING ON THEIR BEHALF WHO ARE MANDATED CHILD ABUSE AND  
          NEGLECT REPORTERS IN THEIR DUTIES AS MANDATED REPORTERS?


                                       PURPOSE

          The purpose of this bill is to require school districts, county  
          offices of education, state special schools and diagnostic  
          centers operated by the State Department of Education, and  
          charter schools to annually train their employees and persons  
          working on their behalf who are mandated child abuse and neglect  
          reporters in the duties of mandated reporters under the child  
          abuse reporting laws, as specified.
           
          Current law  establishes the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting  
          Act ("CANRA"), which generally is intended to protect children  
          from abuse and neglect.  (Penal Code § 11164.)

           Current law  requires mandated reporters to make reports of  
          suspected child abuse or neglect, as specified.  (Penal Code §  
          11165.9.)
           
            Current law  enumerates 44 categories of mandatory child abuse  
          reporters.  (Penal Code § 11165.7.)

           Current law  provides that "(e)mployers are strongly encouraged  
          to provide their employees who are mandated reporters with  
          training in the duties imposed by this article. This training  
          shall include training in child abuse and neglect identification  
          and training in child abuse and neglect reporting.  Whether or  
          not employers provide their employees with training in child  
          abuse and neglect identification and reporting, the employers  
          shall provide their employees who are mandated reporters with  
          the statement required pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section  
          11166.5."  (Penal Code § 11165.7(c).)

           Current law  further provides that "(s)chool districts that do  

                                                                     (More)






                                                            AB 1432 (Gatto)
                                                                     Page 3



          not train their employees (who are mandated reporters) in the  
          duties of mandated reporters under the child abuse reporting  
          laws shall report to the State Department of Education the  
          reasons why this training is not provided."  (Penal Code §  
          11165.7(d).)

           This bill  would instead require "school districts, county  
          offices of education, state special schools and diagnostic  
          centers operated by the State Department of Education, and  
          charter schools (to) annually train their employees and persons  
          working on their behalf (who are mandated reporters) in the  
          duties of mandated reporters under the child abuse reporting  
          laws. The training shall include, but not necessarily be limited  
          to, training in child abuse and neglect identification and child  
          abuse and neglect reporting."  

           This bill  would require that this training be pursuant to the  
          following provisions.

           This bill  would require the State Department of Education, in  
          consultation with the Office of Child Abuse Prevention in the  
          State Department of Social Services, to do all of the following:

               (1) Develop and disseminate information to all school  
               districts, county offices of education, state special  
               schools and diagnostic centers operated by the department,  
               and charter schools, and their school personnel in  
               California, regarding the detection and reporting of child  
               abuse.
               (2) Provide statewide guidelines on the responsibilities of  
               mandated reporters in accordance with the Child Abuse and  
               Neglect Reporting Act, as specified, and require that these  
               guidelines include, but not necessarily be limited to, both  
               of the following:

                    (A) Identification of child abuse and neglect.
                    (B) Reporting requirements for child abuse and  
                    neglect.

               (3) Develop appropriate means of instructing school  
               personnel in the detection of child abuse and neglect and  
               the proper action that school personnel should take in  

                                                                     (More)






                                                            AB 1432 (Gatto)
                                                                     Page 4



               suspected cases of child abuse and neglect, including, but  
               not limited to, an online training module.
           
          This bill  would require school districts, county offices of  
          education, state special schools and diagnostic centers operated  
          by the Department of Education, and charter schools to do both  
          of the following:

               (1)    Except as provided below, provide annual training,  
                 using the online training module provided by the  
                 department, to their employees and persons working on  
                 their behalf who are mandated reporters, as specified, on  
                 the mandated reporting requirements. Mandated reporter  
                 training shall be provided to school personnel hired  
                 during the course of the school year. This training shall  
                 include information that failure to report an incident of  
                 known or reasonably suspected child abuse or neglect is a  
                 misdemeanor, as specified.  

                  (2) Develop a process for all persons required to  
                 receive training pursuant to this section to provide  
                 proof of completing the training within the first six  
                 weeks of each school year or within the first six weeks  
                 of that person's employment. The process developed under  
                 this paragraph may include, but not necessarily be  
                 limited to, the use of a sign-in sheet or the submission  
                 of a certificate of completion to the applicable  
                 governing board or body of the school district, county  
                 office of education, state special school and diagnostic  
                 center, or charter school.

           This bill  would provide that school districts, county offices of  
          education, state special schools and diagnostic centers operated  
          by the Department of Education, and charter schools that do not  
          use the online training module provided by the department shall  
          report to the department the training being used in its place.

                    RECEIVERSHIP/OVERCROWDING CRISIS AGGRAVATION

          For the last several years, severe overcrowding in California's  
          prisons has been the focus of evolving and expensive litigation  
          relating to conditions of confinement.  On May 23, 2011, the  

                                                                     (More)






                                                            AB 1432 (Gatto)
                                                                     Page 5



          United States Supreme Court ordered California to reduce its  
          prison population to 137.5 percent of design capacity within two  
          years from the date of its ruling, subject to the right of the  
          state to seek modifications in appropriate circumstances.   

          Beginning in early 2007, Senate leadership initiated a policy to  
          hold legislative proposals which could further aggravate the  
          prison overcrowding crisis through new or expanded felony  
          prosecutions.  Under the resulting policy, known as "ROCA"  
          (which stands for "Receivership/ Overcrowding Crisis  
          Aggravation"), the Committee held measures that created a new  
          felony, expanded the scope or penalty of an existing felony, or  
          otherwise increased the application of a felony in a manner  
          which could exacerbate the prison overcrowding crisis.  Under  
          these principles, ROCA was applied as a content-neutral,  
          provisional measure necessary to ensure that the Legislature did  
          not erode progress towards reducing prison overcrowding by  
          passing legislation, which would increase the prison population.  
            

          In January of 2013, just over a year after the enactment of the  
          historic Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011, the State of  
          California filed court documents seeking to vacate or modify the  
          federal court order requiring the state to reduce its prison  
          population to 137.5 percent of design capacity.  The State  
          submitted that the, ". . .  population in the State's 33 prisons  
          has been reduced by over 24,000 inmates since October 2011 when  
          public safety realignment went into effect, by more than 36,000  
          inmates compared to the 2008 population . . . , and by nearly  
          42,000 inmates since 2006 . . . ."  Plaintiffs opposed the  
          state's motion, arguing that, "California prisons, which  
          currently average 150% of capacity, and reach as high as 185% of  
          capacity at one prison, continue to deliver health care that is  
          constitutionally deficient."  In an order dated January 29,  
          2013, the federal court granted the state a six-month extension  
          to achieve the 137.5 % inmate population cap by December 31,  
          2013.  

          The Three-Judge Court then ordered, on April 11, 2013, the state  
          of California to "immediately take all steps necessary to comply  
          with this Court's . . . Order . . . requiring defendants to  
          reduce overall prison population to 137.5% design capacity by  

                                                                     (More)






                                                            AB 1432 (Gatto)
                                                                     Page 6



          December 31, 2013."  On September 16, 2013, the State asked the  
          Court to extend that deadline to December 31, 2016.  In  
          response, the Court extended the deadline first to January 27,  
          2014 and then February 24, 2014, and ordered the parties to  
          enter into a meet-and-confer process to "explore how defendants  
          can comply with this Court's June 20, 2013 Order, including  
          means and dates by which such compliance can be expedited or  
          accomplished and how this Court can ensure a durable solution to  
          the prison crowding problem."

          The parties were not able to reach an agreement during the  
          meet-and-confer process.  As a result, the Court ordered  
          briefing on the State's requested extension and, on February 10,  
          2014, issued an order extending the deadline to reduce the  
          in-state adult institution population to 137.5% design capacity  
          to February 28, 2016.  The order requires the state to meet the  
          following interim and final population reduction benchmarks:

                 143% of design bed capacity by June 30, 2014;
                 141.5% of design bed capacity by February 28, 2015; and,
                 137.5% of design bed capacity by February 28, 2016. 

          If a benchmark is missed the Compliance Officer (a position  
          created by the February 10, 2016 order) can order the release of  
          inmates to bring the State into compliance with that benchmark.   


          In a status report to the Court dated May 15, 2014, the state  
          reported that as of May 14, 2014, 116,428 inmates were housed in  
          the State's 34 adult institutions, which amounts to 140.8% of  
          design bed capacity, and 8,650 inmates were housed in  
          out-of-state facilities.   

          The ongoing prison overcrowding litigation indicates that prison  
          capacity and related issues concerning conditions of confinement  
          remain unresolved.  While real gains in reducing the prison  
          population have been made, even greater reductions may be  
          required to meet the orders of the federal court.  Therefore,  
          the Committee's consideration of ROCA bills -bills that may  
          impact the prison population - will be informed by the following  
          questions:


                                                                     (More)






                                                            AB 1432 (Gatto)
                                                                     Page 7



                 Whether a measure erodes realignment and impacts the  
               prison population;
                 Whether a measure addresses a crime which is directly  
               dangerous to the physical safety of others for which there  
               is no other reasonably appropriate sanction; 
                 Whether a bill corrects a constitutional infirmity or  
               legislative drafting error; 
                 Whether a measure proposes penalties which are  
               proportionate, and cannot be achieved through any other  
               reasonably appropriate remedy; and,
                 Whether a bill addresses a major area of public safety  
               or criminal activity for which there is no other  
               reasonable, appropriate remedy.

                                      COMMENTS

          1.  Double-Referral from Senate Education Committee

           This bill passed Senate Education Committee on June 17th (7-0).

          2.  Stated Need for This Bill

           As explained in the Senate Education Committee analysis,  
          according to the author's office, "In recent years, there has  
          been an alarming increase in incidents of unreported child abuse  
          where one or more additional schools employees were aware of the  
          incident-illustrating gaping holes in these mandated reporters'  
          knowledge of the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act.  Despite  
          the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act's clear reporting  
          requirements, school districts are merely encouraged rather than  
          required to provide employees who qualify as mandated reporters  
          with training on either abuse identification or abuse reporting.  
           The absence of training is a failure of our system that leaves  
          millions of students at risk every single day."  

          Proponents of the bill submit that school employees are not  
          always aware of their duty to report incidents of child abuse  
          and neglect or are unsure of the proper procedures for making  
          reports.  Additionally, recent incidents have highlighted the  
          lack of training of educators in their role as a mandated  
          reporter.  In either case, this could lead to incidents of  
          unreported child abuse by school employees.  To address these  

                                                                     (More)






                                                            AB 1432 (Gatto)
                                                                     Page 8



          issues, several pieces of legislation have recently been  
          introduced to take extra steps deemed necessary to ensure that  
          children are better protected.  








































                                                                     (More)










           
           3.  Related Measures

           AB 1432 and AB 135 (Buchanan) each seek to accomplish similar  
          objectives to strengthen the CANRA and ultimately increase  
          student safety in schools.  Specifically, AB 135 requires LEAs  
          to adopt policies and provide employees with regular reminders  
          of their responsibilities as mandated reporters.  This measure  
          takes a more expansive approach by requiring LEAs to annually  
          train their employees, which they are already strongly  
          encouraged to do so under the CANRA.  The two measures (as  
          currently drafted) would not have chaptering issues if both were  
          signed into law.  However, it is not clear that both measures  
          are necessary due to the similarities of the objectives they are  
          seeking to achieve.  AB 135 is currently pending in the Senate  
          Appropriations Committee.  

          There is another pending measure that proposes statutory changes  
          regarding the CANRA-AB 2560 (Bonilla).  This measure would  
          require a teacher credentialing applicant to read and sign a  
          statement regarding his or her role as a mandated reporter, and  
          is pending in the Senate Appropriations Committee.  

                                   ***************




















                                                                     (More)