California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 1521


Introduced by Assembly Member Fox

January 16, 2014


An act to amend Section 97.70 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to local government finance, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1521, as introduced, Fox. Local government finance: property tax revenue allocations: vehicle license fee adjustments.

Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally provides that each jurisdiction shall be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction’s portion of the annual tax increment, as defined.

Existing property tax law also requires that, for purposes of determining property tax revenue allocations in each county for the 1992-93 and 1993-94 fiscal years, the amounts of property tax revenue deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year to the county, cities, and special districts be reduced in accordance with certain formulas. It requires that the revenues not allocated to the county, cities, and special districts as a result of these reductions be transferred to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in that county for allocation to school districts, community college districts, and the county office of education.

Beginning with the 2004-05 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, existing law requires that each city, county, and city and county receive additional property tax revenues in the form of a vehicle license fee adjustment amount, as defined, from a vehicle license fee property tax compensation fund that exists in each county treasury. Existing law requires that these additional allocations be funded from ad valorem property tax revenues otherwise required to be allocated to educational entities.

This bill would modify these reduction and transfer provisions, for the 2014-15 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, by providing for a vehicle license fee adjustment amount calculated on the basis of changes in assessed valuation.

By imposing additional duties upon local tax officials with respect to the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Vote: 23. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 97.70 of the Revenue and Taxation Code
2 is amended to read:

3

97.70.  

Notwithstanding any other law, for the 2004-05 fiscal
4year and for each fiscal year thereafter, all of the following apply:

5(a) (1) (A) The auditor shall reduce the total amount of ad
6valorem property tax revenue that is otherwise required to be
7allocated to a county’s Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund
8by the countywide vehicle license fee adjustment amount.

9(B) If, for the fiscal year, after complying with Section 97.68
10there is not enough ad valorem property tax revenue that is
11otherwise required to be allocated to a county Educational Revenue
12Augmentation Fund for the auditor to complete the allocation
13reduction required by subparagraph (A), the auditor shall
P3    1additionally reduce the total amount of ad valorem property tax
2revenue that is otherwise required to be allocated to all school
3districts and community college districts in the county for that
4fiscal year by an amount equal to the difference between the
5countywide vehicle license fee adjustment amount and the amount
6of ad valorem property tax revenue that is otherwise required to
7be allocated to the county Educational Revenue Augmentation
8Fund for that fiscal year. This reduction for each school district
9and community college district in the county shall be the percentage
10share of the total reduction that is equal to the proportion that the
11total amount of ad valorem property tax revenue that is otherwise
12required to be allocated to the school district or community college
13district bears to the total amount of ad valorem property tax revenue
14that is otherwise required to be allocated to all school districts and
15community college districts in a county. For purposes of this
16subparagraph, “school districts” and “community college districts”
17do not include any districts that are excess tax school entities, as
18defined in Section 95.

19(2) The countywide vehicle license fee adjustment amount shall
20be allocated to the Vehicle License Fee Property Tax Compensation
21Fund that shall be established in the treasury of each county.

22(b) (1) The auditor shall allocate moneys in the Vehicle License
23Fee Property Tax Compensation Fund according to the following:

24(A) Each city in the county shall receive its vehicle license fee
25adjustment amount.

26(B) Each county and city and county shall receive its vehicle
27license fee adjustment amount.

28(2) The auditor shall allocate one-half of the amount specified
29in paragraph (1) on or before January 31 of each fiscal year, and
30the other one-half on or before May 31 of each fiscal year.

31(c) For purposes of this section, all of the following apply:

32(1) “Vehicle license fee adjustment amount” for a particular
33city, county, or a city and county means, subject to an adjustment
34under paragraph (2) and Section 97.71, all of the following:

35(A) For the 2004-05 fiscal year, an amount equal to the
36difference between the following two amounts:

37(i) The estimated total amount of revenue that would have been
38deposited to the credit of the Motor Vehicle License Fee Account
39in the Transportation Tax Fund, including any amounts that would
40have been certified to the Controller by the auditor of the County
P4    1of Ventura under subdivision (j) of Section 98.02, as that section
2read on January 1, 2004, for distribution under the law as it read
3on January 1, 2004, to the county, city and county, or city for the
42004-05 fiscal year if the fee otherwise due under the Vehicle
5License Fee Law (Pt. 5 (commencing with Section 10701) of Div.
62) was 2 percent of the market value of a vehicle, as specified in
7begin delete Sectionend deletebegin insert Sectionsend insert 10752 and 10752.1 as those sections read on
8January 1, 2004.

9(ii) The estimated total amount of revenue that is required to be
10distributed from the Motor Vehicle License Fee Account in the
11Transportation Tax Fund to the county, city and county, and each
12city in the county for the 2004-05 fiscal year under Section 11005,
13as that section read on the operative date of the act that amended
14this clause.

15(B) (i) Subject to an adjustment under clause (ii), for the
162005-06 fiscal year, the sum of the following two amounts:

17(I) The difference between the following two amounts:

begin delete

18(Ia)

end delete

19begin insert(ia)end insert The actual total amount of revenue that would have been
20deposited to the credit of the Motor Vehicle License Fee Account
21in the Transportation Tax Fund, including any amounts that would
22have been certified to the Controller by the auditor of the County
23of Ventura under subdivision (j) of Section 98.02, as that section
24read on January 1, 2004, for distribution under the law as it read
25on January 1, 2004, to the county, city and county, or city for the
262004-05 fiscal year if the fee otherwise due under the Vehicle
27License Fee Law (Part 5 (commencing with Section 10701) of
28Division 2) was 2 percent of the market value of a vehicle, as
29specified in Sections 10752 and 10752.1 as those sections read on
30January 1, 2004.

begin delete

31(Ib)

end delete

32begin insert(ib)end insert The actual total amount of revenue that was distributed
33from the Motor Vehicle License Fee Account in the Transportation
34Tax Fund to the county, city and county, and each city in the county
35for the 2004-05 fiscal year under Section 11005, as that section
36read on the operative date of the act that amended this
37begin delete sub-subclauseend deletebegin insert subsubclauseend insert.

38(II) The product of the following two amounts:

begin delete

39(IIa)

end delete

40begin insert(ia)end insert The amount described in subclause (I).

begin delete

P5    1(IIb)

end delete

2begin insert(ib)end insert The percentage change from the prior fiscal year to the
3current fiscal year in gross taxable assessed valuation within the
4jurisdiction of the entity, as reflected in the equalized assessment
5roll for those fiscal years. For the first fiscal year for which a
6change in a city’s jurisdictional boundaries first applies, the
7percentage change in gross taxable assessed valuation from the
8prior fiscal year to the current fiscal year shall be calculated solely
9on the basis of the city’s previous jurisdictional boundaries, without
10regard to the change in that city’s jurisdictional boundaries. For
11each following fiscal year, the percentage change in gross taxable
12assessed valuation from the prior fiscal year to the current fiscal
13year shall be calculated on the basis of the city’s current
14jurisdictional boundaries.

15(ii) The amount described in clause (i) shall be adjusted as
16follows:

17(I) If the amount described in subclause (I) of clause (i) for a
18particular city, county, or city and county is greater than the amount
19described in subparagraph (A) for that city, county, or city and
20county, the amount described in clause (i) shall be increased by
21an amount equal to this difference.

22(II) If the amount described in subclause (I) of clause (i) for a
23particular city, county, or city and county is less than the amount
24described in subparagraph (A) for that city, county, or city and
25county, the amount described in clause (i) shall be decreased by
26an amount equal to this difference.

27(C) For the 2006-07 fiscalbegin delete year and for each fiscal year
28thereafter,end delete
begin insert year, to the 2013-14 fiscal year, inclusive,end insert the sum of
29the following two amounts:

30(i) The vehicle license fee adjustment amount for the prior fiscal
31year, if Section 97.71 and clause (ii) of subparagraph (B) did not
32apply for that fiscal year, for that city, county, and city and county.

33(ii) The product of the following two amounts:

34(I) The amount described in clause (i).

35(II) The percentage change from the prior fiscal year to the
36current fiscal year in gross taxable assessed valuation within the
37jurisdiction of the entity, as reflected in the equalized assessment
38roll for those fiscal years. For the first fiscal year for which a
39change in a city’s jurisdictional boundaries first applies, the
40percentage change in gross taxable assessed valuation from the
P6    1prior fiscal year to the current fiscal year shall be calculated solely
2on the basis of the city’s previous jurisdictional boundaries, without
3regard to the change in that city’s jurisdictional boundaries. For
4each following fiscal year, the percentage change in gross taxable
5assessed valuation from the prior fiscal year to the current fiscal
6year shall be calculated on the basis of the city’s current
7jurisdictional boundaries.

begin insert

8(D) For the 2014-15 fiscal year, the sum of the following two
9amounts:

end insert
begin insert

10(i) The amount described in clause (i) of subparagraph (B) if
11Section 97.71 and clause (ii) of subparagraph (B) did not apply
12for that fiscal year, for that city, county, and city and county.

end insert
begin insert

13(ii) The product of the following two amounts:

end insert
begin insert

14(I) The amount described in clause (i).

end insert
begin insert

15(II) The percentage change from the 2004-05 fiscal year to the
162014-15 fiscal year, inclusive, in gross taxable assessed valuation
17within the jurisdiction of the entity, as reflected in the equalized
18assessment roll for those fiscal years.

end insert
begin insert

19(E) For the 2015-16 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter,
20the sum of the following two amounts:

end insert
begin insert

21(i) The vehicle license fee adjustment amount for the prior fiscal
22year.

end insert
begin insert

23(ii) The product of the following two amounts:

end insert
begin insert

24(I) The amount described in clause (i).

end insert
begin insert

25(II) The percentage change from the immediately preceding
26fiscal year to the current fiscal year in gross taxable assessed
27valuation within the jurisdiction of the entity, as reflected in the
28equalized assessment roll for those fiscal years.

end insert

29(2) begin deleteFor the 2013-14 fiscal year, the end deletebegin insertThe end insertvehicle license fee
30adjustment amount that is determined under subparagraph (C) of
31paragraph (1)begin insert for the 2013-14 fiscal year, subparagraph (D) of
32paragraph (1) for the 2014-15 fiscal year, and subparagraph (E)
33of paragraph (1) for the 2015-16 fiscal year,end insert
for the County of
34begin delete Orangeend deletebegin insert Orange,end insert shall be increased by fifty-three million dollars
35($53,000,000). For thebegin delete 2014-15end deletebegin insert 2016-17end insert fiscal year and each
36fiscal year thereafter, the calculation of the vehicle license fee
37adjustment amount for the County of Orange under subparagraph
38begin delete (C)end deletebegin insert (E)end insert of paragraph (1) shall be based on a prior fiscal year amount
39that reflects the full amount of this one-time increase of fifty-three
40million dollars ($53,000,000).

P7    1(3) “Countywide vehicle license fee adjustment amount” means,
2for any fiscal year, the total sum of the amounts described in
3paragraphs (1) and (2) for a county or city and county, and each
4city in the county.

5(4) On or before June 30 of each fiscal year, the auditor shall
6report to the Controller the vehicle license fee adjustment amount
7for the county and each city in the county for that fiscal year.

8(d) For the 2005-06 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter,
9the amounts determined under subdivision (a) of Section 96.1, or
10any successor to that provision, shall not reflect, for a preceding
11fiscal year, any portion of any allocation required by this section.

12(e) For purposes of Section 15 of Article XI of the California
13Constitution, the allocations from a Vehicle License Fee Property
14Tax Compensation Fund constitute successor taxes that are
15otherwise required to be allocated to counties and cities, and as
16successor taxes, the obligation to make those transfers as required
17by this section shall not be extinguished nor disregarded in any
18manner that adversely affects the security of, or the ability of, a
19county or city to pay the principal and interest on any debts or
20obligations that were funded or secured by that city’s or county’s
21allocated share of motor vehicle license fee revenues.

22(f) This section shall not be construed to do any of the following:

23(1) Reduce any allocations of excess, additional, or remaining
24funds that would otherwise have been allocated to county
25superintendents of schools, cities, counties, and cities and counties
26pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4) of
27subdivision (d) of Sections 97.2 and 97.3 or Article 4 (commencing
28with Section 98) had this section not been enacted. The allocations
29required by this section shall be adjusted to comply with this
30paragraph.

31(2) Require an increased ad valorem property tax revenue
32allocation or increased tax increment allocation to a community
33redevelopment agency.

34(3) Alter the manner in which ad valorem property tax revenue
35growth from fiscal year to fiscal year is otherwise determined or
36allocated in a county.

37(4) Reduce ad valorem property tax revenue allocations required
38under Article 4 (commencing with Section 98).

39(g) Tax exchange or revenue sharing agreements, entered into
40prior to the operative date of this section, between local agencies
P8    1or between local agencies and nonlocal agencies are deemed to be
2modified to account for the reduced vehicle license fee revenues
3resulting from the act that added this section. These agreements
4are modified in that these reduced revenues are, in kind and in lieu
5thereof, replaced with ad valorem property tax revenue from a
6Vehicle License Fee Property Tax Compensation Fund or an
7Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund.

8

SEC. 2.  

If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
9this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
10local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
11pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
124 of Title 2 of the Government Code.

13

SEC. 3.  

This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
14immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within
15the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into
16immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:

17In order to provide timely fiscal relief to preserve the public
18peace, health, and safety in incorporated cities and cities that
19annexed inhabited areas that lost revenue as a result of the passage
20of Senate Bill 89 of the 2011-12 Regular Session (Chapter 35 of
21the Statutes of 2011), it is necessary that this act take effect
22immediately.



O

    99