Amended in Assembly May 27, 2014

Amended in Assembly April 22, 2014

Amended in Assembly April 2, 2014

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 1539


Introduced by Assembly Member Hagman

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Brown, Nestande, and Waldron)

(Coauthor: Senator Knight)

January 22, 2014


An act to add Section 60605.4 to the Education Code, relating to content standards.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1539, as amended, Hagman. Content standards: computer science.

Existing law requires the State Board of Education to adopt statewide academically rigorous content standards, pursuant to recommendations of the Commission for the Establishment of Academic Content and Performance Standards, in core curriculum areas.

This bill wouldbegin delete requireend deletebegin insert encourageend insert the Instructional Quality Commission to develop and recommend to the state board, on or before July 31,begin delete 2015,end deletebegin insert 2016,end insert computer science content standards, pursuant to recommendations developed by a group of computer science experts. The bill would express that the Legislature encourages the commission to consider existing computer science content standards, including, but notbegin delete necessarilyend delete limited to, national K-12 computer sciencebegin insert contentend insert standards developed by the Computer Science Teachers Association. The bill would encourage the Superintendentbegin insert of Public Instructionend insert, in consultation with the commission, to convene that group of experts and ensure that the group includes individuals from specified groups.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 60605.4 is added to the Education Code,
2to read:

3

60605.4.  

(a) On or before July 31,begin delete 2015,end deletebegin insert 2016,end insert the Instructional
4Quality Commission is encouraged to develop and recommend to
5the statebegin delete board,end deletebegin insert boardend insert computer science content standards, pursuant
6to recommendations developed by a group of computer science
7experts. The Legislature encourages the Instructional Quality
8Commission to consider existing computer sciencebegin insert contentend insert
9 standards, which include, but are not limited to, the national K-12
10computer sciencebegin insert contentend insert standards developed by the Computer
11Science Teachers Association, and consider content standards that
12include, but are not necessarily limited to, standards for teaching
13coding. For purposes of this section, “coding” is the process of
14converting a program design into an accurate and detailed
15representation of that program in a suitable language.

16(b) (1) The Superintendent, in consultation with the Instructional
17Quality Commission, is encouraged to convene the group of experts
18referenced in subdivision (a), and is encouraged to ensure that the
19members of the group include, but are not necessarily limited to,
20all of the following:

21(A) Teachers who teach computer science, including
22mathematics and science teachers, in grades 7 to 12, inclusive.

23(B) Schoolsite principals.

24(C) School district or county office of education administrators.

25(D) University professors.

26(E) Representatives of private sector business or industry.

27(2) The Superintendent, in consultation with the state board,
28shall ensure that one-half of the members of the group are teachers
29as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1).

P3    1(c) Thebegin insert computer scienceend insert content standards may be used by
2school districts to develop computer science programs and course
3assessments but are not mandatory.



O

    96