BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 1639
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 28, 2014

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
                                Wesley Chesbro, Chair
                    AB 1639 (Grove) - As Amended:  April 22, 2014
           
          SUBJECT  :   Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund:  high-speed rail

           SUMMARY  :   Prohibits appropriation of moneys from the Greenhouse  
          Gas Reduction Fund (GHGRF) for purposes of the high-speed rail  
          (HSR) system.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires the Air Resources Board (ARB), pursuant to California  
            Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32), to adopt a  
            statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions limit equivalent to  
            1990 levels by 2020 and adopt regulations to achieve maximum  
            technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emission  
            reductions.

          2)Authorizes ARB to permit the use of market-based compliance  
            mechanisms to comply with GHG reduction regulations, once  
            specified conditions are met.

          3)Establishes the GHGRF and requires all moneys, except for  
            fines and penalties, collected by ARB from the auction or sale  
            of allowances pursuant to a market-based compliance mechanism  
            (i.e., the cap-and-trade program adopted by ARB under AB 32)  
            to be deposited in the GHGRF and available for appropriation  
            by the Legislature.

          4)Establishes the GHGRF Investment Plan and Communities  
            Revitalization Act [AB 1532 (John A. Pérez), Chapter 807,  
            Statutes of 2012] to set procedures for the investment of GHG  
            allowance auction revenues.  AB 1532 authorizes a range of GHG  
            reduction investments and establishes several additional  
            policy objectives.

          5)Requires the investment plan to allocate:  (1) a minimum of 25  
            percent of the available moneys in the fund to projects that  
            provide benefits to identified disadvantaged communities; and;  
             (2) a minimum of 10 percent of the available moneys in the  
            fund to projects located within identified disadvantaged  
            communities [SB 535 (De Leon), Chapter 830, Statutes of 2012].  








                                                                  AB 1639
                                                                  Page  2

             
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   

           1)Background  .  According to ARB, a total reduction of 80 million  
            metric tons (MMT), or 16 percent compared to business as  
            usual, is necessary to achieve AB 32's 2020 limit.   
            Approximately 78 percent of the reductions will be achieved  
            through identified direct regulations.  ARB proposes to  
            achieve the balance of reductions necessary to meet the 2020  
            limit (approximately 18 MMT) through a cap-and-trade program  
            that covers an estimated 600 entities.

            The 2012-13 Budget Act authorized Department of Finance (DOF)  
            to allocate at least $500 million from cap-and-trade revenue,  
            and make commensurate reductions to General Fund expenditure  
            authority, to support the regulatory purposes of AB 32.  AB  
            1532 established a long-term spending strategy for moneys in  
            the GHGRF, including procedures for deposit and expenditure of  
            cap-and-trade auction revenues pursuant to an investment plan.  
             AB 1532 specifically authorizes funding for transportation  
            projects that reduce GHG emissions.

            While DOF and ARB developed a three-year investment plan for  
            the auction proceeds pursuant to AB 1532, the 2013-14 Budget  
            Act provided that the first $500 million in auction revenue be  
            loaned to the GF and did not appropriate any funds pursuant to  
            the investment plan.  For the 2014-15 Budget, the Governor has  
            proposed spending $850 million on a variety of programs,  
            including $250 million for HSR and approximately $350 million  
            for other transportation-related investments.  

            The proposed HSR funding will support construction of the  
            system's initial operating section, which is estimated to cost  
            $31 billion and be completed by 2022.  This includes $58.6  
            million to continue environmental planning of the Phase 1  
            project extending from San Francisco to Anaheim, and $191.4  
            million for right-of-way acquisition and construction of the  
            initial construction segment extending from Madera to near  
            Bakersfield.  The proposal anticipates a reduction of 4.3  
            million metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalents by  
            2030, with an additional one million tons of CO2 annually  
            thereafter, attributable to reduced car and airplane travel.   








                                                                  AB 1639
                                                                 Page  3

            Trailer bill language proposes that beginning in 2015-16, 33  
            percent of all GHGRF revenues be continuously appropriated for  
            the HSR project.  Further, it specifies that the remaining  
            $400 million General Fund loan be directed to HSR.  At this  
            time, the administration has not provided an estimate of  
            projected cap-and-trade auction revenues; thus, it is unclear  
            how much funding would go to HSR in 2015-16 and beyond.

           2)LAO concerns  .  In a March 27, 2014 presentation to the Senate  
            Transportation and Housing Committee, the Legislative  
            Analyst's Office expressed the following concerns:

                 Using Cap-and-Trade Auction Revenues for High-Speed Rail  
               May Not Maximize Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reductions.

                  o         The high-speed rail project would not  
                    contribute significant GHG reductions before 2020,  
                    which is the statutory target for reaching 1990  
                    emissions.  This is because the high-seed rail system  
                    will not be operational until 2022.

                  o         The construction of high-speed rail would  
                    actually generate GHG emissions of 30,000 metric tons  
                    over the next several years.  (The HSR Authority plans  
                    to offset these emissions by planting thousands of  
                    trees in the Central Valley.)

           1)HSR funding will be decided in the Budget Act  .  The question  
            of whether the Legislature agrees with the Governor's proposal  
            to use the GHGRF to support the HSR project will be decided in  
            June when the Budget Act is enacted.  In the event this bill  
            passed the Legislature and was signed by the Governor, it  
            would be enacted next January.  In future years, the bill  
            could be overridden any time the Legislature decided to  
            appropriate GHGRF moneys for HSR.

           
          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          None on file

           Opposition 
           








                                                                  AB 1639
                                                                  Page  4

          Sierra Club California (prior version)

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Lawrence Lingbloom / NAT. RES. / (916)  
          319-2092