BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de León, Chair


          AB 1653 (Garcia) - CalWORKs: victims of abuse.
          
          Amended: June 5, 2014           Policy Vote: Human Service 4-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: August 4, 2014                            
          Consultant: Jolie Onodera       
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.


          Bill Summary: AB 1653 would:
              Require a county to waive a program requirement for an  
              applicant or a recipient who has been identified as a past  
              or present victim of abuse when the requirement would  
              encourage the individual to return to the abuser, or would  
              be detrimental to or unfairly penalize the individual or his  
              or her family. 
              Requires a county to also waive the welfare-to-work  
              requirements for an applicant or participant when it has  
              been determined that good cause exists due to domestic  
              violence, as specified.
               Require a county to reevaluate waivers in conjunction with  
              the annual and semiannual determinations of eligibility  
              completed by the county.
              Require the Department of Social Services (DSS), in  
              consultation with specified stakeholders, to develop a  
              standard, statewide notice to inform all CalWORKs applicants  
              and recipients that victims of abuse have a right to request  
              a waiver of program requirements, as specified.
              Requires a county to inform all CalWORKs applicants and  
              recipients, both orally and in writing in the person's  
              primary language, of the right to request a waiver of  
              program requirements. This notice is required to be provided  
              at application, during the welfare-to-work planning process,  
              at eligibility redetermination, when a notice of action  
              (NOA) for a sanction from failure to participate in a  
              program requirement, and whenever an applicant or recipient  
              voluntarily discloses he or she is a victim of abuse. 

          Fiscal Impact: 
              Major first-year costs in the range of $185 million to $370  
              million (General Fund), and ongoing costs in the range of  








          AB 1653 (Garcia)
          Page 1


              $125 million to $250 million to provide CalWORKs assistance  
              to formerly sanctioned adult recipients and children  
              formerly subject to the MFG rule who would be eligible for  
              waivers of program requirements.
              Unknown, potentially major ongoing costs in the millions of  
              dollars (General Fund) for CalWORKs assistance and  
              administration to the extent additional applicants would  
              qualify for waivers under the provisions of this measure.   
              Ongoing state-reimbursable costs in excess of $5 million  
              (General Fund) for counties to provide notice of waiver  
              rights orally and in writing, in the person's primary  
              language, on multiple occasions, as well as reevaluate  
              waivers at semiannual and annual redeterminations of  
              eligibility rather than with periodic reevaluations of  
              waivers.
              One-time potentially significant county change management  
              costs (including training, written noticing, and automation  
              changes).
              Unknown potential impact on the federal work participation  
              rate (WPR). To the extent a significant number of applicants  
              and recipients qualify for waivers of welfare-to-work  
              requirements, could compromise the state's ability to meet  
              the federal WPR, which could result in future federal  
              penalty assessments in the millions of dollars, which could  
              eventually be deducted from future federal TANF grant  
              awards.

          Background: Existing federal law under the Temporary Assistance  
          for Needy Families (TANF) program provides aid and  
          welfare-to-work services to eligible families, and in  
          California, provides that TANF funds for welfare-to-work  
          services are administered through the California Work  
          Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program.

          Existing state law provides that a county may waive a program  
          requirement for a CalWORKs recipient who has been identified as  
          a past or present victim of abuse when it has been determined  
          that good cause exists that the recipient is a victim of  
          domestic violence (DV) and participation in work or other  
          welfare-to-work activities would be detrimental to, or unfairly  
          penalize, the individual or his or her family. (WIC §  
          11320.3(f)(2).) 

          Existing state law adopts a family violence provision by  








          AB 1653 (Garcia)
          Page 2


          enacting the federal option concerning victims of DV provided  
          for in the TANF program. By adopting this provision, the state  
          is required to establish standards and procedures to identify  
          CalWORKs recipients who have been or are victims of DV, and make  
          referrals to counseling and supportive services. Adopting this  
          option also requires the state to waive, pursuant to a  
          determination of good cause, the welfare-to-work requirements in  
          cases where participation in the program would make it more  
          difficult for CalWORKs recipients to escape DV, would unfairly  
          penalize individuals who have been victims of DV, or are at risk  
          of further DV. (WIC § 11495 et seq.)

          Proposed Law: This bill would require a county to waive a  
          program requirement for a CalWORKs applicant or recipient who  
          has been identified as a past or present victim of abuse when  
          the requirement would encourage the individual to return to the  
          abuser, or would be detrimental to or unfairly penalize the  
          individual or his or her family. Additionally, this bill:
              Requires a county to also waive the welfare-to-work  
              requirements for an applicant or participant when it has  
              been determined that good cause exists due to domestic  
              violence, as specified.
               Requires a county to reevaluate waivers in conjunction  
              with the annual and semiannual determinations of eligibility  
              completed by the county.
              Requires DSS, in consultation with county human services  
              agencies, DV and CalWORKs advocates, and CalWORKs  
              caseworkers, to develop a standard, statewide notice to  
              inform all CalWORKs applicants and recipients that victims  
              of abuse have a right to request a waiver of program  
              requirements, as specified.
              Requires a county to inform all CalWORKs applicants and  
              recipients, both orally and in writing in the person's  
              primary language, of the right to request a waiver of  
              program requirements. This notice is required to be provided  
              at application, during the welfare-to-work planning process,  
              at eligibility redetermination, when a NOA for a sanction  
              from failure to participate in a program requirement, and  
              whenever an applicant or recipient voluntarily discloses he  
              or she is a victim of abuse. 
          
          Staff Comments: The provisions of this bill significantly expand  
          the population and circumstances under which an individual is  
          eligible for a waiver of CalWORKs program requirements.  








          AB 1653 (Garcia)
          Page 3


          Additionally, this bill requires rather than authorizes counties  
          to grant such waivers. Under current law, only CalWORKs  
          recipients are eligible for a waiver of program requirements, at  
          county option, if it has been determined that good cause exists  
          that the recipient is a DV victim and participation in work or  
          other activities would be detrimental to the individual or his  
          or her family. This bill requires counties to waive program  
          requirements for both applicants and recipients who have been  
          identified as victims of any type of abuse (not restricted to  
          DV), when the requirement would encourage the individual to  
          return to the abuser, or would be detrimental to or unfairly  
          penalize the individual or his or her family.

          Because the type of "abuse" is unspecified, former and current  
          victims of any type of abuse (child, physical, verbal, sexual,  
          psychological, emotional, immigrant, and others) could  
          potentially be granted a waiver.  Expanding the population of  
          eligible individuals to include CalWORKs applicants as well as  
          victims of any type of abuse could result in thousands more  
          waivers that counties would be required to be grant.

          By broadening eligibility for a waiver of program requirements  
          when the requirement would encourage the individual to return to  
          the abuser, or would be detrimental to or unfairly penalize the  
          individual or his or her family, the types of program  
          requirements that may potentially be waived could include not  
          only a waiver of welfare-to-work requirements, but also the  
          24-month and 48-month time limits on the receipt of aid, the  
          Maximum Family Grant (MFG) rule, and the "100 hour" child  
          deprivation rule.

          The DSS has indicated the first-year impact of the provisions of  
          this bill could cost in the range of $185 million to $370  
          million in CalWORKs assistance by requiring counties to provide  
          waivers and adding a separate criterion for waiver eligibility,  
          which would largely impact unaided adults in sanction status who  
          do not meet the good cause requirement and unaided children  
          impacted by the MFG rule. These first-year costs include  
          retroactive costs for aiding MFG children. Ongoing costs are  
          estimated in the range of $125 million to $250 million. Further,  
          to the extent an increased number of CalWORKs applicants receive  
          waivers for meeting program requirements would also result in  
          ongoing additional CalWORKs assistance and administrative costs  
          of an unknown, but potentially significant amount in the  








          AB 1653 (Garcia)
          Page 4


          millions of dollars.

          By mandating that counties provide notice of waiver rights  
          orally and in writing, in the person's primary language, on  
          multiple occasions, as well as reevaluate waivers at semiannual  
          and annual redeterminations of eligibility rather than with  
          periodic reevaluations of waivers, this bill results in a  
          state-mandated local program which could result in ongoing  
          state-reimbursable costs in excess of $5 million (General Fund).

          The DSS has indicated that in addition to CalWORKs grant and  
          administrative costs, one-time county change management costs  
          (for training, written noticing, and automation) of an unknown  
          but potentially significant amount would be incurred. 

          To the extent a significant number of applicants and recipients  
          qualify for waivers of welfare-to-work requirements, could  
          potentially result in a negative impact on the federal work  
          participation rate (WPR), the extent of which is unknown and  
          would be dependent on various factors. Should the provisions of  
          this measure compromise the state's ability to meet the federal  
          WPR, could result in future federal penalty assessments in the  
          millions of dollars, which could eventually be deducted from  
          future federal TANF grant awards.