BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1673 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 30, 2014 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Mike Gatto, Chair AB 1673 (Garcia) - As Amended: April 9, 2014 Policy Committee: ElectionsVote:6-0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill provides that a payment, of any amount, made by the occupant of a home or office of a lobbyist, lobbying firm, or lobbyist employer for a meeting or fundraising event to benefit a candidate or campaign committee is considered a contribution and is thus subject to disclosure under the Political Reform Act (PRA). FISCAL EFFECT Minor absorbable costs to the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) for enforcement, potentially offset to some extent by penalty revenues. COMMENTS 1)Background . The PRA, among other things, requires candidates and committees to disclose contributions made and received and expenditures made in connection with campaign activities. When individuals or entities make payments in connection with holding a fundraiser for a candidate, such payments ordinarily are considered contributions to the candidate. Current law allows for certain exceptions, however. For example, payments made by the occupant of a home or office for costs related to any meeting or fundraising event in the occupant's home or office are not considered contributions under the PRA if the costs for the meeting or fundraising event are five hundred dollars ($500) or less. Although existing law prohibits lobbyists from making contributions to elected state officers or candidates for elected state office, the above exception for the purposes of AB 1673 Page 2 hosted fundraising events does not exclude events hosted by lobbyists. A lobbyist, therefore, could hold a fundraiser at his or her home and the cost would not be considered a contribution, as long as the total cost of such an event did not exceed five hundred dollars ($500). 2)Recent FPPC Action . In February, the FPPC approved a settlement in a case in which a registered lobbyist hosted campaign fundraisers for state elective officers and candidates at his house and provided items such items as beverages, flower arrangements, and cigars. The FPPC determined that the total cost of the fundraisers hosted by the lobbyist at his home, including the value the items provided by the lobbyist, exceeded five hundred dollars ($500). As a result, the items provided by the lobbyist during the fundraisers constituted non-monetary contributions to the campaign committees of the elective officers and candidates who benefitted from the fundraisers - all violations of the PRA. As a result, the FPPC levied one of its largest penalties ever against a lobbyist and issued warning letters to the elected officers and candidates who benefitted from the fundraisers. 3)Purpose . According to the author, "AB 1673 will ban lobbyists hosting home fundraisers and eliminate the dual standard that allows lobbyists to host at their homes, non-reportable private affair fundraisers for lawmakers?while at the same time limiting direct gifts to lawmakers to only $10 per month." Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081