BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1673|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1673
          Author:   Garcia (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/13/14 in Senate
          Vote:     27

           
           SENATE ELECTIONS & CONST. AMEND. COMM.  :  5-0, 6/24/14
          AYES: Padilla, Anderson, Hancock, Jackson, Pavley

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  75-0, 5/8/14 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Political Reform Act of 1974:  contributions

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill revises the definition of contribution to  
          include a payment made by a lobbyist or a cohabitant of a  
          lobbyist for costs related to a fundraising event held at the  
          home of the lobbyist, as specified.  This bill makes these  
          payments attributable to the lobbyist for purposes of the  
          prohibition against a lobbyist making a contribution to  
          specified candidates and elected officers.

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 8/13/14 make AB 1673 identical to SB  
          1441 (Lara) in order to reconcile conflicts.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1673
                                                                     Page  
          2


           1. Provides, pursuant to the Political Reform Act (PRA),  
             provides for the comprehensive regulation of campaign  
             financing, including requiring the reporting of campaign  
             contributions and expenditures and imposing other reporting  
             and recordkeeping requirements on campaign committees. 

           2. Defines "contribution" for purposes of the PRA as a payment,  
             a forgiveness of a loan, a payment of a loan by a third  
             party, or an enforceable promise to make a payment, except to  
             the extent that full and adequate consideration is received,  
             unless it is clear from the surrounding circumstances that it  
             is not made for political purposes. 

           3. Does not include in the definition of "contribution" a  
             payment made by an occupant of a home or office for costs  
             related to any meeting or fundraising event held in the  
             occupant's home or office if the costs for the meeting or  
             fundraising event are $500 or less. 

           4. Prohibits a lobbyist from making, and an elected state  
             officer or candidate for elective state office from  
             accepting, a contribution if the lobbyist is registered to  
             lobby the governmental agency for which the candidate is  
             seeking election or the governmental agency of the elected  
             state officer.

          This bill:

          1. Revises the definition of "contribution" to include a payment  
             made by a lobbyist or a cohabitant of a lobbyist for costs  
             related to a fundraising event held at the home of the  
             lobbyist, as specified.  This bill makes these payments  
             attributable to the lobbyist for purposes of the prohibition  
             against a lobbyist making a contribution to specified  
             candidates and elected officers. 

          2. Revises the definition of "contribution" to include a payment  
             made by a lobbying firm for costs related to a fundraising  
             event held at the office of the lobbying firm.

           Background
           
           Hosted Fundraisers  .  The PRA, among other things, requires  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1673
                                                                     Page  
          3

          candidates and committees to disclose contributions made and  
          received and expenditures made in connection with campaign  
          activities.  The term "contribution" is defined as any payment  
          for political purposes for which full and adequate consideration  
          is not provided to the donor. 

          When individuals or entities make payments in connection with  
          holding a fundraiser for a candidate, such payments ordinarily  
          are considered contributions to the candidate.  However, current  
          law allows for some exceptions.  For example, payments made by  
          the occupant of a home or office for costs related to any  
          meeting or fundraising event in the occupant's home or office  
          are not considered contributions under the PRA if the costs for  
          the meeting or fundraising event are $500 or less.

          Although existing law prohibits lobbyists from making  
          contributions to elected state officers or candidates for  
          elected state office if that lobbyist is registered to lobby the  
          governmental agency for which the candidate is seeking election  
          or the governmental agency of the elected state officer, the  
          exception to the definition of the term "contribution" for the  
          purposes of hosted fundraising events does not exclude events  
          hosted by lobbyists.  As a result, a lobbyist could hold a  
          fundraiser at his/her home and the cost would not be considered  
          a contribution, as long as the total cost of such an event did  
          not exceed $500.  If other parties donate money or goods in  
          connection with the event, their payments must also be counted  
          to determine if $500 has been spent in connection with the  
          fundraiser.  This includes goods or services provided by the  
          candidate or any other person attending the event.  If the cost  
          of the event exceeds $500, all payments are counted as  
          contributions.

           Recent Events  .  In February of this year, the Fair Political  
          Practices Commission (FPPC) approved a settlement in a case in  
          which a registered lobbyist hosted campaign fundraisers for  
          state elective officers and candidates at his house where he  
          provided items such as beverages, flower arrangements, and  
          cigars.  The FPPC investigated and determined that the total  
          cost of the fundraisers hosted by the lobbyist at his home,  
          including the value the items provided by the lobbyist, exceeded  
          $500.  As a result, the items provided by the lobbyist during  
          the fundraisers constituted non-monetary contributions to the  
          campaign committees of the elective officers and candidates who  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1673
                                                                     Page  
          4

          benefitted from the fundraisers - all violations of the PRA.  As  
          a result, the FPPC levied one of the largest penalties against a  
          lobbyist and issued warning letters to the elected officers and  
          candidates who benefitted from the fundraisers.

           FISCAL EFFECT :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, minor  
          absorbable enforcement costs to the FPPC (General Fund).

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/14/14)

          California Common Cause

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  75-0, 5/8/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Fong, Fox,  
            Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,  
            Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hernández, Holden,  
            Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal,  
            Maienschein, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian,  
            Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Quirk-Silva,  
            Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting,  
            Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada,  
            John A. Pérez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Eggman, Gorell, Mansoor, V. Manuel Pérez,  
            Vacancy


          RM:d  8/14/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****
          







                                                                CONTINUED