BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1692|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1692
          Author:   Garcia (D)
          Amended:  8/13/14 in Senate
          Vote:     27

           
           SENATE ELECTIONS & CONST. AMEND. COMM.  :  4-1, 6/24/14
          AYES:  Padilla, Hancock, Jackson, Pavley
          NOES:  Anderson

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  77-0, 5/15/14 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Political Reform Act of 1974

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill limits the use of campaign funds and legal  
          defense funds to pay fines and penalties that are imposed for an  
          improper personal use of campaign funds.

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 8/13/14 add double-jointing language  
          with AB 1666 (Garcia) and SB 831 (Hill).

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

           1. Prohibits campaign funds from being used to pay or reimburse  
             fines, penalties, judgments, or settlements, except those  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1692
                                                                     Page  
          2

             resulting from either of the following:

             A.   Parking citations issued in the performance of an  
               activity that was directly related to a political,  
               legislative, or governmental purpose; or

             B.   Any other action for which payment of attorney's fees  
               from contributions is permitted pursuant to the Political  
               Reform Act (PRA).

           1. Requires campaign expenditures to be reasonably related to a  
             political, legislative, or governmental purpose.  Campaign  
             expenditures that confer a substantial personal benefit on an  
             individual with the authority to approve the expenditure of  
             campaign funds must be directly related to a political,  
             legislative, or governmental purpose.  "Substantial personal  
             benefit" for these purposes means an expenditure that results  
             in a direct personal benefit of more than $200.

           2. Permits candidates and elected officials to establish a  
             legal defense fund to defray attorney's fees and other  
             related legal costs incurred in the defense of the candidate  
             or elective officer who is subject to one or more civil,  
             criminal, or administrative proceedings arising directly out  
             of the conduct of an election campaign, the electoral  
             process, or the performance of the officer's governmental  
             activities and duties.  Funds deposited into a legal defense  
             fund may be used only to defray those attorney's fees and  
             other related legal costs. 

           3. Provides that campaign funds that are raised on or after  
             January 1, 1989, by a candidate and that remain in the  
             campaign account at the time the candidate leaves elective  
             office, or at the end of the postelection reporting period  
             following the defeat of the candidate, are considered surplus  
             campaign funds.  Such funds may be used for payment of  
             attorney's fees for litigation which arises directly out of a  
             candidate's or elected official's activities, duties, or  
             status as a candidate or elected officer.

           4. Provides that expenditures of campaign funds for attorney's  
             fees and other costs in connection with administrative,  
             civil, or criminal litigation are not directly related to a  
             political, legislative, or governmental purpose except where  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1692
                                                                     Page  
          3

             the litigation is directly related to activities of a  
             committee that are consistent with its primary objectives or  
             arises directly out of a committee's activities or out of a  
             candidate's or elected officer's activities, duties, or  
             status as a candidate or elected officer.

          This bill:

           1. Prohibits an expenditure of campaign funds to pay a fine,  
             penalty, judgment, or settlement relating to an expenditure  
             of campaign funds that was found to be improper because the  
             expenditure resulted in either of the following:

             A.   A personal benefit to the candidate or officer, and the  
               expenditure was not reasonably related to a political,  
               legislative, or governmental purpose; or

             B.   A substantial personal benefit to the candidate or  
               officer, and the expenditure was not directly related to a  
               political, legislative, or governmental purpose.

           1. Codifies a regulatory definition of the term "attorney's  
             fees and other related legal costs" for the purposes of  
             provisions of existing law that specify the permissible uses  
             of funds raised into a legal defense fund, and makes that  
             definition applicable to provisions of state law that  
             restrict the use of surplus campaign funds and that limit the  
             circumstances under which campaign funds may be used to pay  
             fines, penalties, judgments, or settlements.

           2. Contains double-jointing language with AB 1666 (Garcia) and  
             SB 831 (Hill) to avoid chaptering-out issues.

           Background
           
           Personal use of campaign funds  .  Existing law generally  
          prohibits campaign funds from being used for personal expenses,  
          and instead requires campaign expenditures to be reasonably  
          related to a political, legislative, or governmental purpose.   
          When a campaign expenditure results in a personal benefit of  
          more than $200 to an individual who had the authority to approve  
          the expenditure, the expenditure must be directly related to a  
          political, legislative, or governmental purpose.  These  
          provisions are intended to ensure that campaign funds are not  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1692
                                                                     Page  
          4

          used as a method of personally enriching candidates and officers  
          of political committees.

           Use of campaign funds to pay fines & penalties  .  As noted above,  
          the PRA generally allows campaign funds to be used to pay or  
          reimburse fines and penalties only if the action is one for  
          which the use of campaign funds to pay attorney's fees will be  
          permissible.  The use of campaign funds to pay attorney's fees  
          is permissible only when those attorney's fees arise directly  
          out of an election campaign, the electoral process, or the  
          performance of an official's governmental activities.  These  
          provisions are a natural extension of the "personal use"  
          provisions of the PRA -- if litigation against a candidate or  
          elected official is unrelated to that person's duties or  
          activities as a candidate or official, then the expenditure of  
          campaign funds for attorney's fees (or to pay any fines or  
          penalties that result from the litigation) would not be  
          reasonably or directly related to a political, governmental, or  
          legislative purpose, but instead would serve to defray the  
          personal legal expenses of the candidate or official.

           Regulatory definition of "attorney's fees"  .  As noted above,  
          existing law permits candidates and elected officials to  
          establish a legal defense fund to defray attorney's fees and  
          other related legal costs under certain situations.  The Fair  
          Political Practices Commission (FPPC) has adopted a regulation  
          to define the term "attorney's fees and other related legal  
          costs" for the purpose of expenditures from legal defense funds.  
           

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  77-0, 5/15/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox,  
            Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,  
            Gorell, Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hernández,  
            Holden, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal,  
            Maienschein, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian,  
            Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, John A. Pérez, V.  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1692
                                                                     Page  
          5

            Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas,  
            Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner, Weber,  
            Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Mansoor, Waldron, Vacancy


          RM:d:n  8/14/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                   ****  END  ****
          

































                                                                CONTINUED