BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1732|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1732
          Author:   Stone (D)
          Amended:  7/1/14 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 6/24/14
          AYES:  Jackson, Anderson, Corbett, Lara, Leno, Monning, Vidak

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  73-0, 5/8/14 (Consent) - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Vehicles:  manufacturers, distributors, and dealers

           SOURCE  :     California New Car Dealers Association


           DIGEST  :    This bill prohibits a licensee from advertising a  
          vehicles prior use or ownership history in an inaccurate manner.  
           This bill also expands the authorized use of the word rebate to  
          allow advertisement of rebates offered by a finance company  
          affiliated with a vehicle manufacturer or distributor, a  
          regulated utility, or a governmental entity.  

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law: 

          1.Protects consumers and competitors against unlawful, unfair or  
            fraudulent business acts or practices and unfair, deceptive,  
            untrue, or misleading advertising.  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1732
                                                                     Page  
          2


          2.Makes it unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or  
            association, or any employee thereof, to make or disseminate  
            before the public in this state, in any newspaper or other  
            publication or in any other manner or means whatever, any  
            statement concerning personal property which is untrue or  
            misleading, and which is known, or which by the exercise of  
            reasonable care should be known, to be untrue or misleading.  

          3.Prohibits any person from acting as a vehicle dealer,  
            remanufacturer, manufacturer, or transporter, as specified,  
            without having first been issued a license or temporary  
            permit, as specified.  

          4.Prohibits the holder of a license from, among other things,  
            making or disseminating any statement which is untrue or  
            misleading and which is known, or which by the reasonable  
            exercise of case should be known to be untrue or misleading,  
            as specified.  

          5.Prohibits the holder of a license from advertising or offering  
            for sale or exchange in any manner, any vehicle not actually  
            for sale at the premises of the dealer or available to the  
            dealer directly from the manufacturer or distributor of the  
            vehicle at the time of the advertisement or offer.  

          6.Prohibits the holder of a license from failing, within 48  
            hours, in writing to withdraw any advertisement of a vehicle  
            that has been sold or withdrawn from sale.  

          7.Prohibits the holder of a license from using "rebate" or  
            similar words, including, but not limited to, "cash back," in  
            advertising the sale of a vehicle unless the rebate is  
            expressed in a specific dollar amount and is in fact a rebate  
            offered by the vehicle manufacturer or distributor directly to  
            the retail purchaser of the vehicle or to the assignee of the  
            retail purchaser.  

          8.Authorizes the holder of a license to advertise a vehicle  
            sales price that includes a deduction for a rebate provided  
            that the advertisement clearly and conspicuously discloses, in  
            close proximity to the amount advertised, the price of the  
            vehicle before the rebate deduction and the amount of the  
            rebate, each so identified. 

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1732
                                                                     Page  
          3


          This bill:

          1.Authorizes the use of "rebate" or similar words in an  
            advertisement if the rebate is offered by a finance company  
            affiliated with a vehicle manufacturer or distributor, a  
            regulated utility, or a governmental entity.

          2.Provides that a dealer may not advertise a rebate deduction  
            that conflicts with another advertised rebate deduction.

          3.Prohibits the holder of a license from advertising the prior  
            use or ownership history of a vehicle in an inaccurate manner.

           Background
           
          Since 1959, California has regulated the advertising practices  
          of vehicle manufacturers, distributors, and dealers.  These  
          regulations serve to increase transparency in automobile sales,  
          protect consumers from deceptive advertising and sales  
          practices, and to foster an open market that allows for the free  
          flow of information.  Over the past 50 years, the Legislature  
          has periodically modified its regulations governing vehicle  
          advertising in response to changes in industry practices.  

           Prior Legislation
           
          AB 964 (Bonta, 2013) would have prohibited the advertising or  
          selling of a used vehicle as "certified" when a dealer knows or  
          should have known that the vehicle is subject to a  
          manufacturer's safety recall.  The bill died on the Assembly  
          Inactive File.

          AB 753 (Monning, 2011) would have expressly prohibited a rental  
          car company from renting a vehicle that is subject to a recall  
          notice unless the vehicle has been repaired as specified in the  
          notice.  The bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee.

          AB 68 (Montanez, Chapter 128, Statutes of 2005) provided that a  
          car dealer may not advertise or sell as "certified" a used or  
          pre-owned motor vehicle unless specified conditions are  
          satisfied.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1732
                                                                     Page  
          4

          Local:  Yes

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  7/31/14)

          California New Car Dealers Association (source)
          AAA Northern California, Nevada, and Utah
          Automobile Club of Southern California

          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author writes:

            AB 1732 seeks to modernize California's advertising laws to  
            better protect consumers and promote fair and open markets for  
            the sale of all vehicles.  California's advertising laws were  
            created to allow consumers to have a complete understanding of  
            their obligations when making a purchase decision on a vehicle  
            and to accurately compare advertisements from different  
            dealers.  This bill seeks to clarify and update current laws  
            to reflect industry's best [practices in three ways]:

                 Rebate Source Advertising:  Current law limits a  
               dealer's ability to only advertise a rebate from a  
               manufacturer[,] even though . . . government agencies and  
               finance companies [offer] their own rebates and request  
               dealers to advertise these rebates to members of the  
               public.  AB 1732 allows dealers to advertise governmental  
               and other rebates to consumers, such as Cash for Clunkers  
               and the Clean Vehicle Rebate Program.

                 Rebate Advertising:  The interaction between [Business  
               and Professions] Code Sections 17200 and 17500 and the  
               dealer advertising laws about how to advertise rebates  
               (Vehicle Code Section 11713.16(e)) has caused confusion for  
               dealers and law enforcement.  AB 1732 clarifies an already  
               commonly held belief that a rebate must not be advertised  
               if it conflicts with another advertised rebate.

                 Vehicle's Prior Use Disclosures:  Current regulations  
               state that express advertisements of a vehicle's prior use  
               or ownership history must be accurate.  This regulation is  
               often unknown to dealers and to help ensure compliance AB  
               1732 codifies this regulation.

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  73-0, 5/8/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Bigelow, Bloom,  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1732
                                                                     Page  
          5

            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Fong, Fox,  
            Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,  
            Grove, Hagman, Harkey, Roger Hernández, Holden, Jones,  
            Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal, Maienschein,  
            Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Nestande,  
            Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner,  
            Waldron, Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, John A.  
            Pérez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Eggman, Gorell, Gray, Hall, Mansoor, V.  
            Manuel Pérez, Vacancy


          AL:k  8/4/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****

























                                                                CONTINUED