BILL ANALYSIS Ó
AB 1773
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 30, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
AB 1773 (Allen) - As Amended: March 13, 2014
Policy Committee:
AccountabilityVote:11-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill requires the Judicial Council's semiannual reports to
the Legislature regarding judicial branch contracting to be
available electronically in a format enabling the data to be
searched, sorted, extracted, organized, or filtered, and to
include the following additional information:
1)A list of all new contracts and the complete history of
contracts amended during the reporting period, including the
date and duration of the amendments.
2)Information on whether each contract was competitively bid,
the justification for contracts that were not competitively
bid, and whether the contract was with a disabled veteran
business enterprise, or, in the case of an information
technology contract, with a small business.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)One-time information technology costs to purchase and
integrate software for the competitive bidding reporting
requirements would be at least $1.7 million, based on
estimates from 2011, when the Judicial Council considered
acquiring this capability (Trial Court Trust Fund).
2)There would be ongoing costs to enter contract data, including
contract amendments. The Judicial Council indicates the
judiciary has about 21,000 annual contracts statewide.
Workload would depend in part on how many contracts are
amended during each reporting period. If 25% to 50% of the
contracts were amended each year, data entry costs would be at
AB 1773
Page 2
least several hundred thousand dollars annually (Trial Court
Trust Fund).
COMMENTS
Purpose . Current law requires the Judicial Council to submit
reports twice a year to the Legislature and the Bureau of State
Audits (BSA) containing specified information on contracts for
the judicial branch. In reports from March and December 2013,
the BSA found the semiannual reports were of limited usefulness
and recommended various improvements to the judicial branches
procurement practices. The BSA in part recommended the
Legislature require the Judicial Council reports to include
information on new contracts and the complete history of amended
contracts; information on whether or not a contract was
competitively bid; information on the state's small business
preference for information technology procurements; and, require
the reports to be available in a user-friendly electronic
format. This bill implements these recommendations.
According to the author, this bill is intended to create
transparency in judicial branch contracting activities and
ensure that contracting information is fully available and
easily accessible to the public.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081