BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1773 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 30, 2014 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Mike Gatto, Chair AB 1773 (Allen) - As Amended: March 13, 2014 Policy Committee: AccountabilityVote:11-0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: SUMMARY This bill requires the Judicial Council's semiannual reports to the Legislature regarding judicial branch contracting to be available electronically in a format enabling the data to be searched, sorted, extracted, organized, or filtered, and to include the following additional information: 1)A list of all new contracts and the complete history of contracts amended during the reporting period, including the date and duration of the amendments. 2)Information on whether each contract was competitively bid, the justification for contracts that were not competitively bid, and whether the contract was with a disabled veteran business enterprise, or, in the case of an information technology contract, with a small business. FISCAL EFFECT 1)One-time information technology costs to purchase and integrate software for the competitive bidding reporting requirements would be at least $1.7 million, based on estimates from 2011, when the Judicial Council considered acquiring this capability (Trial Court Trust Fund). 2)There would be ongoing costs to enter contract data, including contract amendments. The Judicial Council indicates the judiciary has about 21,000 annual contracts statewide. Workload would depend in part on how many contracts are amended during each reporting period. If 25% to 50% of the contracts were amended each year, data entry costs would be at AB 1773 Page 2 least several hundred thousand dollars annually (Trial Court Trust Fund). COMMENTS Purpose . Current law requires the Judicial Council to submit reports twice a year to the Legislature and the Bureau of State Audits (BSA) containing specified information on contracts for the judicial branch. In reports from March and December 2013, the BSA found the semiannual reports were of limited usefulness and recommended various improvements to the judicial branches procurement practices. The BSA in part recommended the Legislature require the Judicial Council reports to include information on new contracts and the complete history of amended contracts; information on whether or not a contract was competitively bid; information on the state's small business preference for information technology procurements; and, require the reports to be available in a user-friendly electronic format. This bill implements these recommendations. According to the author, this bill is intended to create transparency in judicial branch contracting activities and ensure that contracting information is fully available and easily accessible to the public. Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081