BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1857|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1857
          Author:   Frazier (D)
          Amended:  8/22/14 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE  :  10-1, 6/24/14
          AYES:  DeSaulnier, Gaines, Beall, Cannella, Galgiani, Hueso,  
            Lara, Liu, Pavley, Roth
          NOES:  Wyland

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 8/14/14
          AYES:  De León, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters, Gaines

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  60-14, 5/27/14 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Caltrans equipment procurement

           SOURCE  :     Transportation California


           DIGEST  :    This bill authorizes the Department of General  
          Services (DGS), until January 1, 2021, to purchase and equip  
          heavy mobile fleet vehicles and special equipment for use by the  
          Department of Transportation (Caltrans) by means of best value  
          procurement, establishes requirements for bid evaluation and  
          protest procedures as specified.

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 8/22/14 shift the responsibility of  
          procuring this heavy equipment from Caltrans to DGS.

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1857
                                                                     Page  
          2

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law requires DGS to investigate and  
          establish the need for acquiring new state-owned motor vehicles  
          and for all state agencies to acquire motor vehicles through, or  
          under the supervision of, DGS.  Existing law further requires  
          state agencies to award contracts for goods and services to the  
          lowest responsible bidder, with a few limited exceptions.

          This bill:

          1.Authorizes DGS, until January 1, 2021, to purchase and equip  
            heavy mobile fleet vehicles and special equipment for use by  
            Caltrans by means of best value procurement.

          2.Defines "best value procurement" as a contract award  
            determined by objective criteria related to price, features,  
            functions, and life-cycle costs that may include:

                 Total cost of ownership, including repair and  
               maintenance costs.
                 Product performance, productivity, and safety standards.
                 The supplier's ability to perform to the contract  
               requirements.
                 Environmental benefits, including reduction of  
               greenhouse gas emissions, reduction of air pollutant  
               emissions, or reduction of toxic or hazardous materials.

          1.Requires, in addition to disclosure of the minimum  
            requirements for qualification, the solicitation document  
            specify what business performance measures in addition to  
            price shall be given a weighted value. 

          2.Requires DGS use a scoring method based on those factors and  
            price in determining the successful bid, and requires the  
            scoring method ensure substantial weight is given to the  
            contract price. 

          3.Requires the solicitation document provide for submission of  
            sealed price information, and that an evaluation of all  
            criteria other than price be completed before the opening of  
            price information.

          4.Allows, upon written request of any bidder who has submitted a  
            bid, notice of the proposed award be posted in a public place  
            in the DGS offices at least 24 hours before awarding the  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1857
                                                                     Page  
          3

            contract or purchase order. 

          5.Provides for a protest procedure before making an award, as  
            specified.

          6.Limits the total value of vehicles and equipment purchased  
            through this bill $20,000,000 annually.

          7.Requires DGS, on or before June 1, 2020, prepare an evaluation  
            of the best value procurement, including a recommendation on  
            whether or not the process should be continued, to be posted  
            on the Caltrans Internet Web site on or before June 30, 2020.

           Comments

           According to the National Association of State Procurement  
          Officials' 2011-2012 Survey of State Procurement Practices, 34  
          states use full life-cycle costs to determine contract awards to  
          vendors.  Studies suggest that results have generally been good  
          when public agencies utilize best value procurement, despite the  
          long-standing precedence for the low-bid procurement system.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

           Unknown annual increases in vehicle and equipment purchase  
            costs, if best value procurement results in higher initial  
            costs, likely offset by life-cycle cost savings over time.  
            (State Highway Account)

           One-time costs to DGS, likely in the range of $150,000 in  
            2017-18, to prepare an evaluation of Caltrans' best value  
            procurement pilot program. (General Fund)

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/22/14)

          Transportation California (source) 
          California Manufacturers & Technology Association
          California Taxpayers Association
          Caterpillar, Inc.
          John Deere
          AFSCME

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1857
                                                                     Page  
          4

          South Coast Air Quality Management District

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author, this bill is  
          intended to provide DGS with an optional procurement method to  
          determine whether overall savings may be achieved by evaluating  
          factors other than price when purchasing heavy-duty vehicles and  
          equipment.  While the standard lowest responsible bid  
          procurement process provides a clear and objective measure to  
          ensure the lowest initial procurement cost, it prevents  
          considering other value-related factors when purchasing heavy  
          vehicles.  The author suggests that, while initial procurement  
          costs may be higher with best value procurement, through this  
          alternative procurement method Caltrans will realize overall  
          life-cycle cost savings.

          Writing in support of this bill, Caterpillar Inc. and its  
          California dealers claim that the state would benefit from  
          moving to a life-cycle cost model for procuring heavy vehicles  
          and equipment.  They note that allowing DGS to make a broader  
          based evaluation of equipment purchase options will attract  
          qualified bidders and hold them accountable for delivering the  
          highest quality product.  They also note that the result of  
          including "downstream" operating costs associated with equipment  
          purchase decisions into solicitations and bids will likely  
          result in lower overall costs.  Caltrans subjects much of its  
          heavy equipment to strenuous, taxing work, and therefore  
          factoring the cost of the equipment over its entire lifespan  
          appears reasonable and responsible.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  60-14, 5/27/14
          AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Ammiano, Bloom, Bocanegra, Bonilla,  
            Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon, Campos, Chau,  
            Chesbro, Cooley, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Eggman,  
            Fong, Fox, Frazier, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,  
            Gray, Hall, Roger Hernández, Holden, Jones-Sawyer, Levine,  
            Linder, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Medina, Mullin, Muratsuchi,  
            Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Perea, John A. Pérez, V.  
            Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas,  
            Skinner, Stone, Ting, Weber, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada,  
            Atkins
          NOES: Allen, Conway, Donnelly, Beth Gaines, Gorell, Grove,  
            Hagman, Harkey, Jones, Mansoor, Melendez, Wagner, Waldron,  
            Wilk

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1857
                                                                     Page  
          5

          NO VOTE RECORDED: Bigelow, Chávez, Logue, Patterson,  
            Quirk-Silva, Vacancy


          JA:nl  8/25/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****




































                                                                CONTINUED