BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1964 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 9, 2014 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Mike Gatto, Chair AB 1964 (Dickinson) - As Introduced: February 19, 2014 Policy Committee: Public SafetyVote: 5-2 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill applies unsafe handgun restrictions to single-shot pistols that can be easily modified to semi-automatic weapons. FISCAL EFFECT Minor nonreimbursable local costs for incarceration, offset to a degree by increased fine revenue, to the extent the misdemeanor penalty for selling or providing unsafe handguns is applied to additional cases. COMMENTS 1)Rationale. Current law provides that unsafe handguns, as specified, may not be manufactured or sold in California. The Department of Justice (DOJ) is required to maintain a roster of unsafe handguns. According to the author, since the enactment of the Unsafe Handgun law, the statute has been amended to add exemptions to the prohibitions on buying and selling these guns. One of the most significant loopholes in the Unsafe Handgun law concerns single shot handguns. In effect, a person may purchase a handgun manufactured or altered to accept a single bullet (no semi-automatic reload of a bullet in the firing chamber), even if the handgun is considered by DOJ as unsafe. The author states, "The single shot exemption undermines the state Unsafe Handgun Law and results in an increasing number of handguns being obtained that do not meet state safety requirements. Buyers have learned that altering a semi-automatic handgun so that it becomes a single shot AB 1964 Page 2 handgun can be easily undone, returning the weapon to its original illegal configuration. "AB 1964 will eliminate the exemption for single shot handguns in the state Unsafe Handgun law. AB 1964 will halt the growing trend of people buying and converting unsafe handguns to get around state mandated safety features and/or safety test for handguns sold in California." 2)Unsafe handguns . SB 15 (Polanco), Statutes of 1999, made it a misdemeanor for any person to manufacture, import for sale, offer for sale, give, or lend any unsafe handgun, as defined, with certain specific exceptions. SB 15 defined an unsafe handgun as one that a) does not have a requisite safety device; b) does not meet specified firing tests; and c) does not meet a specified drop safety test. 3)Support . The CA Chapters of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence states, "Assembly Bill 1964 addresses an exploited loophole in the Unsafe Handgun Act. Existing law allows for the purchase of a semi-automatic handgun that is not on the roster if the weapon was first modified to accept only a single bullet. In practice, this has allowed dealers to modify unsafe handguns to single shot weapons for the purpose of the sale, after which they are readily converted back to semiautomatic status. These actions completely negate the intent of the Unsafe Handgun Act. This bill eliminates this 'single-shot exemption'. "The 'single-shot exemption' has been abused in recent years. According to the Department of Justice, up until 2009, no more than 1,100 single shot handguns were purchased each year. However, beginning in 2010, the number of unsafe single shot handguns purchased skyrocketed. In year 2013, more than 18,000 single shot handguns were purchase in California. Clearly, dealers and buyers have found a blatant way to circumvent California's safe handgun law and the newer safety requirements such as the chamber load indicator or microstamping technology. 4)There is no registered opposition . 5)Prior Legislation . AB 169 (Dickinson), 2013, contained the provisions of this bill in a larger bill and was vetoed due to the governor's concern regarding restricting private party AB 1964 Page 3 off-roster sales to two per year, which is not in AB 1964. The governor's veto stated that closing the single-shot exemption loophole "makes sense." Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081