BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 2034|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2034
          Author:   Gatto (D)
          Amended:  8/20/14 in Senate
          Vote:     21


           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 6/24/14
          AYES:  Jackson, Anderson, Corbett, Lara, Leno, Monning, Vidak

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 8/14/14
          AYES:  De León, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters, Gaines

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 5/28/14 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Protective orders

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill incorporates the authority of a family  
          member to petition the court to seek visitation with an isolated  
          elder or dependent adult within existing court processes, and  
          provides that upon a filing of a petition for visitation, the  
          court must determine counsel for the elder or dependent adult,  
          and if no attorney is retained be the elder or dependent adult,  
          this bill authorizes the court to appoint counsel to the elder  
          or dependent adult.  This bill also specifies that the  
          non-prevailing party may be required to pay the fees and costs  
          of the elder or dependent adult's legal counsel, and that if the  
          elder or dependent adult fails to participate in the petition  
          proceeding in any meaningful way, the court shall appoint a  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2034
                                                                     Page  
          2

          guardian ad litem for the elder or dependent adult.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1.Generally authorizes courts to issue protective orders in  
            proceedings involving civil harassment, workplace and  
            postsecondary school site violence, domestic violence,  
            juvenile law, and elder or dependent adult abuse.

          2.The Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act  
            (EADACPA), generally provides civil protections and remedies  
            for victims of elder and dependent adult abuse and neglect.

          3.Authorizes a petition to be brought on behalf of an abused  
            elder or dependent adult by a conservator or a trustee of the  
            elder or dependent adult, an attorney-in-fact of an elder or  
            dependent adult who acts within the authority of the power of  
            attorney, a person appointed as a guardian ad litem for the  
            elder or dependent adult, or other person legally authorized  
            to seek a protective order, as defined.

          4.Provides that, upon filing a petition for protective orders  
            under EADACPA, the petitioner may obtain a temporary  
            restraining order, as specified, except to the extent a rule  
            is inconsistent.  However, the court may issue an ex parte  
            order excluding a party from the petitioner's residence or  
            dwelling only on specific showings.

          5.Authorizes the court to grant or deny a request for the  
            issuance of a temporary restraining order without notice on  
            the same day that the petition is submitted to the court,  
            unless the petition is filed too late in the day to permit  
            effective review, in which case the order shall be granted or  
            denied on the next day of judicial business in sufficient time  
            for the order to be filed that day with the clerk of the  
            court.

          6.Requires, within 21 days, or, if good cause appears to the  
            court, 25 days, from the date that a request for a temporary  
            restraining order is granted or denied, a hearing to be held  
            on the petition.  If no request for temporary orders is made,  
            the hearing shall be held within 21 days, or, if good cause  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2034
                                                                     Page  
          3

            appears to the court, 25 days, from the date that the petition  
            is filed.

          7.Authorizes the respondent to file a response that explains or  
            denies the alleged abuse.

          8.Authorizes the court, upon notice and a hearing, to issue any  
            of the orders, as specified, and authorizes the court, after  
            notice and hearing, to issue an order excluding a person from  
            a residence or dwelling if the court finds that physical or  
            emotional harm would otherwise result to the petitioner, other  
            named family or household member of the petitioner, or  
            conservator of the petitioner. 

          9.Provides that, in the discretion of the court, an order issued  
            after notice and a hearing may have duration of not more than  
            five years, subject to termination or modification by further  
            order of the court either on written stipulation filed with  
            the court or on the motion of a party.  These orders may be  
            renewed upon the request of a party, either for five years or  
            permanently, without a showing of any further abuse since the  
            issuance of the original order, subject to termination or  
            modification by further order of the court either on written  
            stipulation filed with the court or on the motion of a party.   
            The request for renewal may be brought at any time within the  
            three months before the expiration of the order.

          10.Specifies that there is no filing fee for a petition,  
            response, or paper seeking the reissuance, modification, or  
            enforcement of an EADACPA protective order.

          11.Provides, as specified, that a petitioner shall not be  
            required to pay a fee for law enforcement to serve an order  
            issued under the above provision.

          12.Authorizes the court to award court costs and attorney's fees  
            to the prevailing party in any EADACPA protective order  
            action.

          13.Provides the following definitions:

             A.   "Elder" means any person residing in California, 65  
               years of age or older;


                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2034
                                                                     Page  
          4

             B.   "Dependent adult" means any person between the ages of  
               18 and 64 years who resides in California and who has  
               physical or mental limitations that restrict his/her  
               ability to carry out normal activities or to protect  
               his/her rights, including, but not limited to, persons who  
               have physical or developmental disabilities, or whose  
               physical or mental abilities have diminished because of  
               age;

             C.   "Abuse of an elder or dependent adult" means either:   
               (1) the physical abuse, neglect, financial abuse,  
               abandonment, isolation, abduction, or other treatment with  
               resulting physical harm or pain or mental suffering; or (2)  
               the deprivation by a care custodian of goods or services  
               that are necessary to avoid harm or mental suffering;

             D.   "Physical abuse" means assault, battery, assault with a  
               deadly weapon, unreasonable physical constraint, or  
               prolonged or continual deprivation of food or water, sexual  
               assault, or use of a physical or chemical restraint or  
               psychotropic medication ; and

             E.   "Isolation" means any of the following:

               (1)    Acts intentionally committed for the purpose of  
                 preventing, and that do serve to prevent, an elder or  
                 dependent adult from receiving his/her mail or telephone  
                 calls;

               (2)    Telling a caller or prospective visitor that an  
                 elder or dependent adult is not present, or does not wish  
                 to talk with the caller, or does not wish to meet with  
                 the visitor where the statement is false, is contrary to  
                 the express wishes of the elder or the dependent adult,  
                 whether he/she is competent or not, and is made for the  
                 purpose of preventing the elder or dependent adult from  
                 having contact with family, friends, or concerned  
                 persons;

               (3)    False imprisonment, as defined; or

               (4)    Physical restraint of an elder or dependent adult,  
                 for the purpose of preventing the elder or dependent  
                 adult from meeting with visitors.

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2034
                                                                     Page  
          5


          1.Provides that acts alleging isolation are subject to a  
            rebuttable presumption that they do not constitute isolation  
            if they are performed pursuant to the instructions of a  
            physician and surgeon licensed to practice medicine in the  
            state, who is caring for the elder or dependent adult at the  
            time the instructions are given, and who gives the  
            instructions as part of his/her medical care.

          2.Provides that acts alleging isolation do not constitute  
            isolation if they are performed in response to a reasonably  
            perceived threat of danger to property or physical safety.

          This bill:

          1.Incorporates the authority of a family member to petition the  
            court to seek visitation with an isolated elder or dependent  
            adult within existing court processes.

          2.Provides that upon a filing of a petition for visitation, the  
            court must determine counsel for the elder or dependent adult,  
            and if no attorney is retained by the elder or dependent  
            adult, this bill authorizes the court to appoint counsel to  
            the elder or dependent adult.

          3.Specifies that the non-prevailing party may be required to pay  
            the fees and costs of the elder or dependent adult's legal  
            counsel, and that if the elder or dependent adult fails to  
            participate in the petition proceeding in any meaningful way,  
            the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem for them.

          4.Provides that if a specified relative files a petition, the  
            elder or dependent adult shall be notified that if he/she does  
            not attend the hearing, the court may issue a protective order  
            that facilitates visitation that could last up to five years.

           Background
           
          The California Legislature, in recognition of the need of  
          special protection for California's vulnerable elder and  
          dependent adult population, has enacted significant criminal and  
          civil protections for elders and dependent adults.  In 1983, the  
          Legislature determined that crimes against dependent adults  
          deserved special consideration and established enhanced criminal  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2034
                                                                     Page  
          6

          penalties against individuals who perpetrate crimes, including  
          great bodily harm, infliction of pain, endangerment, and false  
          imprisonment, against dependent adults.  In 1986, the  
          Legislature extended these protections to elders.

          In 1992, the Legislature enacted SB 679 (Mello, Chapter 774,  
          Statutes of 1991) which established the EADACPA.  The EADACPA  
          provides enhanced civil remedies to ensure adequate  
          representation of and protection for victims of elder or  
          dependent adult physical and financial abuse and neglect.  These  
          laws authorize courts to issue temporary restraining orders and  
          injunctions against persons engaging in violent, threatening,  
          abusive, or harassing conduct.

           Prior Legislation
           
          AB 454 (Silva, Chapter 101, Statutes of 2011) added due process  
          procedures regarding termination or modification of a protective  
          order issued under the EADACPA.

          AB 1596 (Hayashi, Chapter 572, Statutes of 2009) enacted  
          recommendations from the Judicial Council's Protective Orders  
          Working Group for statutory procedural changes to the protective  
          orders statutes and provided clarity and consistency for  
          requests for protective orders.

          AB 225 (Beall, Chapter 480, Statutes of 2008) provided that an  
          elder or dependent adult who petitions for a protective order  
          under the EADACPA is not required to pay a fee for law  
          enforcement to serve an order issued by the court.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

           Potentially significant ongoing costs in the range of $165,000  
            to $650,000 (*Trial Court Trust Fund) to trial courts for  
            processing petitions and holding hearings.  This estimate is  
            based on a range of 100 to 500 petitions filed annually (less  
            than 2 to 10 petitions per county per year) with varying  
            degrees of complexity.  These costs will be offset in part to  
            the extent some petitioners will have otherwise filed for  
            conservatorship.

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2034
                                                                     Page  
          7


           Potentially significant state-reimbursable costs (General  
            Fund) to provide court-appointed counsel, including public  
            defenders, to represent elder and dependent adults in  
            specified cases.

           Non-reimbursable local costs for enforcement offset to a  
            degree by fine revenue for misdemeanor violations of  
            protective orders.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/20/14)

          Kasem Cares Foundation
          National Association of Social Workers


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 5/28/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox,  
            Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gorell,  
            Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hernández, Holden,  
            Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal,  
            Maienschein, Mansoor, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi,  
            Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, John A.  
            Pérez, V. Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner,  
            Waldron, Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Frazier, Vacancy


          AL:e  8/20/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****








                                                                CONTINUED