BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2056 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 2056 (Dababneh) As Amended August 6, 2014 Majority vote ----------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |78-0 |(May 15, 2014) |SENATE: |36-0 |(August 11, | | | | | | |2014) | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: INS. SUMMARY : Increases disclosure of exclusions and payment provisions in pet insurance policies and establishes uniform definitions for exclusions commonly used in pet insurance policies. The Senate amendments : 1)Expand the definition of "pre-existing condition" to include conditions that arise during a waiting period. 2)Provide pet insurers with the ability to use the standard definitions in whole or in part. 3)Make technical and clarifying changes. EXISTING LAW : 1)Classifies pet insurance as property/casualty insurance. 2)Requires those selling pet insurance to be licensed as a property/casualty broker-agent. 3)Requires property/casualty insurance policy rates to be reviewed and approved by the commissioner. 4)Prohibits property/casualty insurance rates from being excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory. AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill: 1)Required pet insurance policies to use standard definitions for a number of terms including the following: AB 2056 Page 2 a) "Veterinary expenses" are the costs associated with medical advice, diagnosis, care or treatment by a licensed veterinarian. b) "Pre-existing condition" is a condition for which a veterinarian has provided advice or treatment or a condition for which the pet exhibited signs or symptoms before the effective date of the insurance policy. c) "Waiting period" is the period of time from when the policy is effective and when some or all of the coverage begins. d) "Hereditary disorder" is a genetically transmitted abnormality that causes illness or disease. e) "Congenital disorder" is a condition present from birth which causes or contributes to an illness or disease. f) "Chronic condition" is one that can be treated or managed but not cured. 2)Required pet insurers to disclose whether the policy excludes coverage for any of the following: a) Pre-existing condition. b) Hereditary disorder. c) Congenital disorder. d) Chronic condition. e) Waiting period. 3)Required pet insurers to disclose if any other exclusions are included in the policy and direct the consumer to the policy for details regarding those exclusions. 4)Required pet insurers to provide consumers with a summary description of the method used to determine claim payments. 5)Required pet insurers to allow anyone who purchases pet insurance to return the policy within 30 days with a full refund of any premium paid unless the insurer has paid a claim AB 2056 Page 3 under the policy. If a claim has been paid, the option to return the policy is not available, and the cancellation provisions in the policy will apply. 6)Permitted the Insurance Commissioner (commissioner) to impost civil penalties of up to $5,000 for each violation and up to $10,000 for each willful violation. 7)Required the commissioner to hold a hearing regarding any violations and that the hearing is subject to the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act. 8)Provided the commissioner with the authority to adopt regulations necessary to administer the provisions of this bill. 9)Deferred implementation of the bill until July 1, 2015. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : 1)Purpose. According to the sponsor, pet insurance policies are often difficult for consumers to navigate and understand. Typically there are several types of policies that itemize covered treatments, deductibles, and lifetime/per illness maximums. Additionally, the costs of different policies can vary based on the amount of coverage, the type of coverage, as well as the species, age, and breed of the pet. This bill would require pet insurers to disclose this information regarding their policies so that consumers can more easily determine the most appropriate policy to fit their needs. By allowing consumers to better ascertain the constrictions and limitations of pet insurance policies, they will limit their financial risk, be more likely to purchase a product that fits their needs, and be less likely to complain when utilizing their pet insurance coverage. 2)Cost of veterinary care. According to the American Pet Products Association, the total United States pet industry expenditures in 2012 were an estimated $53.33 billion, $27.4 billion of which was spent on veterinary care and over the counter medicine. In 2011, total pet insurance expenditures accounted for $450 million and it is expected to grow rapidly to an estimated $750 million by 2015. AB 2056 Page 4 3)Previous legislation. AB 2411 (Jones) of 2010, passed the Legislature but was vetoed by the Governor. This bill is more expansive than AB 2411 in terms of the definitions, disclosure requirements, and enforcement mechanisms relating to pet insurance. Analysis Prepared by : Paul Riches / INS. / (916) 319-2086 FN: 0004600