BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 2231
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  April 28, 2014


                     ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION
                                Raul Bocanegra, Chair

                    AB 2231 (Gordon) - As Amended:  April 21, 2014
           

           2/3 vote.  Fiscal committee.
           
          SUBJECT  :  State Controller:  property tax postponement

           SUMMARY  :  Reinstates the Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens  
          Property Tax Postponement (PTP) program to provide property tax  
          deferment to seniors and disabled persons.  Specifically,  this  
          bill  :  

          1)Establishes the Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens Property  
            Tax Postponement Fund (Fund) within the State Treasury and  
            annually appropriates funds for the purposes of paying costs  
            and disbursements related to the PTP program.

          2)Reinstates the PTP program that provided property tax  
            deferment to seniors and disabled persons and eliminates, on  
            July 1, 2015, the current prohibition on any person filing a  
            claim and the State Controller (Controller) from accepting  
            applications for the PTP program. 

          3)Requires the Controller to transfer moneys in the Fund in  
            excess of $10 million to the General Fund (GF).   

          4)Requires that loan repayments related to the PTP program be  
            deposited into the Fund.  Repeals current law that requires  
            that all moneys in an impound account created pursuant to the  
            PTP program be continually appropriated to the Controller.   
            Makes other conforming changes deleting the impound account in  
            the statute.

          5)Repeals the Senior Citizens Mobilehome Property Tax  
            Postponement Law.  Removes mobilehomes, houseboats, and  
            floating homes from the definition of "residential dwelling".   
            Makes conforming changes to provisions referring to  
            mobilehomes, houseboats, and floating homes in the statute.









                                                                  AB 2231
                                                                  Page  2

          6)Repeals current law allowing the Controller to subordinate  
            liens for postponement of real property taxes where the  
            Controller determines subordination is required, provided the  
            interests of the state are adequately protected.  Makes  
            conforming changes to the authority of the Controller to  
            subordinate liens.

          7)Provides that taxes shall become due and payable in full if,  
            in addition to current law, the claimant is refinancing the  
            residential dwelling and if the claimant has elected to  
            participate in a reverse mortgage program for the residential  
            dwelling.

          8)Requires funds derived from the voluntary sale or condemnation  
            of a residential dwelling, which has a lien placed on it due  
            to the PTP program, to be placed in the Fund instead of the  
            impound account.  Repeals the option for a claimant whose  
            residential dwelling was voluntarily sold or condemned to draw  
            upon the impound account to purchase a new residential  
            dwelling, secured by a new lien.  Prohibits a claimant whose  
            residential dwelling was voluntarily sold or condemned from  
            drawing upon the amount in the Fund.

          9)Provides in the case of a claimant whose property taxes are  
            paid by a lender, as specified, the tax collector to notify  
            the auditor of the claimant's name, address, and the duplicate  
            amount of money the Controller transferred to the tax  
            collector via an electronic fund transfer.  

          10)Requires the county auditor, treasurer, or disbursing officer  
            to send a check within 60 days to the Controller in an amount  
            based on the duplicated electronic transfer made by the  
            Controller.  Deletes current law that made these requirements  
            optional if the Commission on State Mandates determined them  
            to be a reimbursable mandate.

          11)Requires a county tax collector to notify the Controller  
            within 60 days, in a manner the controller shall direct, of  
            all property subject to a "Notice of Lien for Postponed  
            Property Taxes" that becomes tax defaulted subsequent to the  
            date of entry on the secure roll.  Deletes current law  
            requiring notification when a "Notice of Lien for Postponed  
            Property Taxes" become subject to collection procedures that  
            are available for collection of delinquent taxes or assessment  
            on the unsecured roll.








                                                                  AB 2231
                                                                  Page  3


          12)Requires the Controller, upon request of the tax collector,  
            to provide information that is required for the preparation  
            and enforcement of the sale of property.  The tax collector or  
            designee shall certify to the Controller, under penalty of  
            perjury, that the information requested are necessary for the  
            preparation and enforcement of the sale of property.  The  
            information provided to the tax collector is not public record  
            and is not open to public inspection.

          13)Provides that for purposes of defining "income," all losses  
            and nonexpenses, as defined, shall be converted to zero for  
            the purposes of determining whether the homeowner meets the  
            PTP program requirements.

          14)Increases the amount of equity necessary in a residential  
            dwelling from 20% to 40% of the full value of the property to  
            be eligible for the PTP program.  

          15)Repeals from the definition of "property taxes," property  
            taxes that become delinquent after the claimant became 62  
            years of age or after the claimant became blind or disabled,  
            and instead, defines "property taxes" to mean property taxes  
            for current fiscal years for which the claim is made and  
            excludes delinquent taxes for prior fiscal years.

          16)Repeals current law allowing the Controller, upon approval of  
            the claimant, to make payments directly to a lender, mortgage  
            company, or escrow.  Instead, the Controller, upon approval of  
            the claimant, is limited to making payments directly to the  
            county tax collector for the property taxes owed.  Repeals  
            current law allowing the Controller to issue a certificate of  
            eligibility to pay delinquent taxes.

          17)Requires the claim for postponement to be filed after  
            September 1, instead of May 15, of the calendar year in which  
            the fiscal year for which postponement is claimed begins, and  
            on or before April 10, instead of December 10, of that fiscal  
            year.  

          18)Provides, in cases of willful neglect, that an electronic  
            funds transfer for that current fiscal year can be used to pay  
            delinquent taxes only if accompanied by sufficient amounts to  
            pay all of the delinquent penalties, costs, fees, and  
            interest.  If a sufficient amount is not received by the tax  








                                                                  AB 2231
                                                                  Page  4

            collector within 30 days from the date of the electronic funds  
            transfer, the tax collector may return the electronic funds  
            transfer to the Controller to deny the postponement claim.   
            The Controller shall notify the claimant in writing of when  
            the electronic funds transfer has been submitted to the tax  
            collector.  In the event of willful neglect, the Controller  
            shall also notify the claimant in writing and provide a  
            notification to the tax collector, that a payment amount  
            sufficient to pay all of the delinquent penalties, costs,  
            fees, and interest must be received by the tax collector  
            within 30 days from the date of the electronic funds transfer,  
            and that if sufficient payment is not received, the tax  
            collector can return the electronic funds transfer and deny  
            the postponement claim.  The Controller shall notify the  
            claimant in writing when an electronic funds transfer has been  
            made if a postponement claim is reversed after appeal.  

          19)Finds and declares that this bill imposes a limitation on the  
            public's right to access to the meetings of public bodies or  
            the writings of public officials and agencies, and that this  
            measure is necessary to protect against identity theft.

          20)Provides that no reimbursement is required for certain costs  
            that may be incurred by a local agency or school district  
            because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates  
            a crime or infraction, changes the penalty for a crime or  
            infraction, or changes the definition of a crime.  However, if  
            the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act  
            contains other costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to  
            local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be  
            made.  

           EXISTING LAW  

          1)Establishes the Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens  
            Postponement Law, the Senior Citizens Tenant-Stockholder  
            Postponement Law, the Senior Citizens Mobilehome Postponement  
            Law, and the Senior Citizens Possessory Interest Holder  
            Postponement Law in the R&TC, all of which allow the  
            Controller to pay property taxes to county tax collectors on  
            behalf of individuals over the age of 62 or disabled persons  
            making less than $39,000.  (R&TC Sections 20581- 20641.)

          2)Establishes the Senior Citizens Homeowners and Renters  
            Property Tax Assistance Law, administered by the Franchise Tax  








                                                                  AB 2231
                                                                  Page  5

            Board (FTB), which is a direct grant program to income  
            eligible senior citizens.  (R&TC Sections 20501 - 20561.)  

          3)Establishes the County Deferred PTP for Senior and Disabled  
            Citizens, with participating counties, to pay property taxes  
            to county tax collectors on behalf of individuals over the age  
            of 62 or disabled persons making less than $35,500.  (R&TC  
            Sections 20800 - 20825.)

          4)Prohibits the filing of a claim and prohibits the Controller  
            from accepting applications to postpone the payment of ad  
            valorem property taxes under the Senior Citizens Property Tax  
            Assistance and Postponement Law.  (R&TC Section 20623.)

          5)Provides that a tax collector has the power to sell  
            residential property 5 or more years after the property has  
            become tax defaulted.  (R&TC Section 3691.)

          6)Provides that a tax lien on real property and improvement  
            assessments declared to be a lien on real property have  
            priority over all other liens on the property, regardless of  
            the time of their creation.  (R&TC Section 2192.1.)
             
           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   

           1)The Author Statement  .  The author explains that "AB 2231 would  
            reinstate the property-tax postponement program and  
            incorporate several changes to increase the sustainability of  
            the program, giving qualified seniors and disabled  
            Californians some much needed financial flexibility.   
            Additionally, the proposed program changes in AB 2231 will go  
            a long way to helping secure the PTP Fund and to ensuring the  
            long-term sustainability of the program.  Over the 30 years it  
            was in operation, this property tax postponement program  
            helped almost 6,000 California seniors and disabled citizens.   
            After five years of non-payment, the homes of some former  
            participants in this program are now at risk of tax sale.  For  
            those living on fixed incomes where a tax bill may mean losing  
            their home, AB 2231 will provide welcome relief."

           2)Arguments in Support  .  Proponents of this bill state "[t]he  
            original program was enacted in 1977, after the passage of a  
            constitutional amendment authorizing the postponement of  








                                                                  AB 2231
                                                                  Page  6

            property taxes, which was in response to concerns that senior  
            homeowners on fixed incomes could lose their homes because of  
            the inability to pay property tax bills.  The program was  
            indefinitely suspended in February of 2009, but a 2011 law was  
            enacted to allow counties the option to implement their own  
            starting January 1, 2012.  Reinstituting this program  
            statewide would help all elderly and disabled Californians  
            take advantage of this benefit to help them stay in their  
            homes.  Reinstitution would also extend relief to those who  
            abruptly lost the ability for postponement when the program  
            was suspended in 2009."

           3)Background  .  California has several property tax programs  
            benefiting the elderly and disabled individuals, including  
            property tax reappraisal relief, property tax assistance, and  
            property tax postponement.  The assistance program provides a  
            direct grant to qualifying seniors and disabled individuals  
            who own or rent a residence.  The assistance program, which is  
            administered by the FTB, was established in 1967 to provide  
            direct property tax relief to seniors living on a fixed  
            income.  The program was later expanded to include renters who  
            meet the income requirement, and to homeowners who are blind  
            and or disabled, regardless of their age.  

            Unlike the assistance programs that refund a percentage of  
            property taxes paid, the postponement program allows eligible  
            homeowners to defer payment of all, or a portion, of the  
            property taxes on their residence.  The program was enacted in  
            1977, after the passage of a constitutional amendment  
            authorizing the postponement of property taxes (California  
            Constitution, Article 13, Section 8) and is administered by  
            the Controller's office.  The constitutional amendment was in  
            response to concerns that senior homeowners on fixed incomes  
            could lose their homes because of the inability to pay raising  
            property tax bills.  Originally designed for individuals over  
            62 years of age, the program is now also available to eligible  
            blind and disabled persons, regardless of age.  

            The State has not provided funding for the assistance program  
            since the 2007-08 Budget; as such, California has not paid  
            claims more recently than those made in 2008.  On February 20,  
            2009, the postponement program was indefinitely suspended as  
            part of the budget reductions to the state's GF programs.   
            [SBx3 8 (Ducheny), Chapter 4, Statutes of 2009.]  The funding  
            of the program was eliminated and the Controller was  








                                                                  AB 2231
                                                                  Page  7

            prohibited from accepting new applications after February 20,  
            2009.

            In response to the suspension of the postponement program,  
            Governor Brown signed AB 1090 (Blumenfield), Chapter 369,  
            Statutes of 2011, creating the County Deferred PTP for Senior  
            Citizens and Disabled Citizens.  Under this new program,  
            counties may join the program by adopting a resolution  
            indicating the county's intention to participate.   
            Participating counties must establish a Property Tax Deferral  
            Fund within its Treasury, which will be used to make payments  
            equivalent to the amount of deferred property taxes.  Payments  
            from the Property Tax Deferral Fund will be made to the county  
            and will be processed in the same manner as all other property  
            tax payments.  Since the enactment of the County Deferred  
            Property Tax program, only one county has adopted a resolution  
            indicating its intention to participate.

           4)What does the bill do  ?  As explained by the author, the  
            purpose of this bill is to reinstate the PTP program but also  
            improve the long term sustainability of the program.  To that  
            end, this bill increases the amount of equity required in the  
            home from 20% to 40%, and eliminates mobilehomes, houseboats,  
            and floating homes from the definition of "residential  
            dwelling." Increasing the necessary equity in the home will  
            help ensure that California is made whole in case of  
            foreclosure or forced sale.  Also, the Controller's office has  
            suggested eliminating mobilehomes from the definition of  
            residential dwelling because mobile homes tend to depreciate  
            over time, leaving very little value to pay off the lien.   
            Additionally, this bill modernizes and streamlines payment  
            methods by establishing the Senior Citizens and Disabled  
            Citizens PTP Fund within the State Treasury, utilizing  
            electronic fund transfer in place of certificates and  
            eliminating the impound account.  Finally, this bill  
            eliminates the ability of a claimant to borrow against the  
            impound fund in order to purchase a new residential property.

           5)Impact of PTP Program Suspension  .  The PTP program helped  
            thousands of low- and moderate-income elderly, blind and  
            disabled individuals to remain in their homes.  Historically,  
            the loan repayments, with few exceptions, have equaled or  
            exceeded the annual program expenditures and administrative  
            costs.  Over the long-term, the program has been  
            self-supporting.  For example, in 2007-08 Fiscal Year (FY) and  








                                                                  AB 2231
                                                                  Page  8

            2008-09 FY, the Controller's Office collected less money than  
            it disbursed in loans.  However, the overall cumulative fiscal  
            impact of the program has been positive:  the PTP program  
            collected $41 million more in PTP loan repayments than it  
            disbursed in PTP loans.  In addition to allowing program  
            participants to remain in their homes, the PTP program has  
            also reduced county property tax default rates and increased  
            county tax collection revenues.

            Over the last 30 years, the PTP program has provided  
            assistance to more than 200,000 homeowners.  Nearly every  
            county has at least one program participant, and most counties  
            have several dozen participants.  Los Angeles County accounts  
            for 21% of program participants.  San Diego, San Bernardino,  
            Riverside, and Orange counties have 28%, and the nine San  
            Francisco - Bay Area counties have approximately 19% of the  
            program participants.  

            According to the survey conducted by the Controller's Office  
            in recent years, the program suspension has had a direct  
            negative impact not only on the program participants but also  
            on the counties.  The suspension of the PTP program, coupled  
            with the elimination of the FTB's Homeowners and Renters  
            Assistance program, has created a tremendous financial  
            hardship for low-income senior, blind, and disabled  
            homeowners.  The program participants have expressed fear of  
            losing their homes to tax-default sales and foreclosures by  
            lenders because of the failure to pay property taxes directly  
            or through an impound account initiated by the lender.   
            Participants have also expressed concerns about becoming  
            homeless or dependent on family members and not being able to  
            afford basic necessities.  Many claimants have been in the  
            program for over 20 years and have been counting on the loan  
            program to pay their property taxes.  More than 50% of the  
            program participants are 75 years of age or older, and 208  
            claimants approved for FY 2008-09 were older than 90 years of  
            age.  

            Furthermore, the counties have also been negatively impacted  
            by the program suspension.  In 2010, the county tax collectors  
            reported a decrease in revenue due to higher delinquencies  
            rates, an increase in related workload, including the number  
            of properties that the counties were forced to sell as  
            tax-defaulted, and an increased strain on county services by  
            displaced homeowners.








                                                                  AB 2231
                                                                  Page  9


           6)Lien Priority  .  The PTP program is operated by the Controller,  
            which is still required to collect on outstanding PT  
            Postponement loans.  Under that program, PTP loans are  
            assigned "judgment lien" status, which place them in line  
            based on the date they were recorded relative to other liens.   
            In general, PTP judgment liens are paid off after liens  
            recorded before them, but before liens recorded after them.   
            Property tax and special assessment liens, however, have  
            priority over all other liens, regardless of the time of its  
            creation, so-called "super-priority" lien status.  

            In 2011, AB 1090 attempted to provide counties with a  
            "super-priority" lien status for postponed property taxes.   
            Proponents maintained that counties strongly endorsed the  
            "super-priority" lien status that comes from utilizing  
            property taxes and assessments because it ensured repayment of  
            postponed property taxes at the county level.  As noted  
            earlier, the State-administered PTP program has always  
            maintained a "judgment lien" status on PTP loans, and still  
            does.  The State, therefore, is responsible for property taxes  
            collected by local governments and bears all of the liability.  
             If the author's intent is to improve the long term  
            sustainability of the PTP program, the author may wish to  
            provide "super-priority" liens on property in exchange for the  
            postponement of property taxes.  

           7)Double-referral  .  This bill was double-referred to the  
            Assembly Committee on Local Government, and passed out of the  
            Committee on a 9 - 0 vote on April 16, 2013.  For additional  
            discussion of this bill's provisions, please refer to that  
            committee's analysis.

           8)Related Legislation  .  AB 1322 (Patterson) reinstates the  
            Senior Citizens' PTP program that provided property tax  
            deferment to seniors and disabled persons.  This bill was held  
            in the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

           9)Prior Legislation  :

             a)   AB 1090 (Blumenfield), Chapter 369, Statutes of 2011,  
               established the County Deferred Property Tax Program for  
               Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens and allowed each  
               county to elect to participate in the program.









                                                                  AB 2231
                                                                  Page  10

             b)   ABx1 34 (Budget Committee), introduced in the 2011-12  
               Legislative Session, reinstates the Senior Citizens' PTP  
               program that provided property tax deferment to seniors and  
               disabled persons.  ABx1 34 was vetoed by the Governor  
               stating, "Given the very significant cuts to state and  
               local core public services that are occurring, the state  
               cannot afford the $19.3 million that the Department of  
               Finance estimates this bill would cost during the 2011-2012  
               fiscal year or the continuing estimated annual revenue cost  
               of $30 million." 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
                California Association of County Treasurers and Tax Collectors  
          (Sponsor)
          California State Association of Counties
          California Taxpayers Association

           Opposition 
           
          None on file
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :  Carlos Anguiano / REV. & TAX. / (916)  
          319-2098