BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2305 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 8, 2014 Counsel: Sandy Uribe ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY Tom Ammiano, Chair AB 2305 (Ridley-Thomas) - As Introduced: February 21, 2014 SUMMARY : Modifies the elements of several weapons-possession statutes to prohibit carrying the specified weapons on or about the person, rather than on the person. Specifically, this bill : 1)Prohibits carrying a switchblade on or about the person. 2)Prohibits carrying a concealed firearm on or about the person. 3)Prohibits carrying a loaded firearm on or about the person. 4)Makes technical, non-substantive changes. EXISTING LAW : 1)Makes it a misdemeanor to carry a switchblade having a blade two or more inches in length upon the person, or to possess the knife in the passenger's or driver's area of any vehicle in any public place or place open to the public. (Pen. Code, § 21510.) 2)Defines a "switchblade knife" as "a knife having the appearance of a pocketknife and includes a spring-blade knife, snap-blade knife, gravity knife or any other similar type knife, the blade or blades of which are two or more inches long and which can be released automatically by a flick of a button, pressure on the handle, flip of the wrist or other mechanical device, or is released by the weight of the blade or by any type of mechanism whatsoever." It does not include "a knife designed to open with one hand utilizing thumb pressure applied solely to the blade of the knife or a thumb stud attached to the blade, provided that the knife has a detent or other mechanism that provides resistance that must be overcome in opening the blade, or that biases the blade back towards it closed position." (Pen. Code, § 17235.) AB 2305 Page 2 3)Makes it a crime to carry a concealed firearm in a vehicle that is under the person's control or in which the person is an occupant, and also prohibits carry it upon the person. (Pen. Code, § 25400, subd. (a).) 4)Exempts from prosecution for carrying a concealed firearm any person who is licensed to carry that weapon in a concealed manner. (Pen. Code §§ 25655 and 26150.) 5)Contains other exemptions in the Penal Code and the Fish and Game Code allowing individuals to carry concealed firearms. (See e.g., Pen. Code, § 25640 [licensed hunters or fisherman while engaged in hunting or fishing].) 6)Makes it a crime to carry a loaded firearm either upon the person, or in a vehicle while in any public place or on any public street in an incorporated city, or in any public place or on any public street in a prohibited area of unincorporated territory. (Pen. Code, § 25850, subd. (a).) 7)Requires a firearm to be unloaded and kept in a locked container when it is being transported from one place to another. (Pen. Code, § 25505.) FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : 1)Author's Statement : According to the author, "Assembly Bill 2305 amends California law as suggested by the Court of Appeal in the Pellecer decision to replace the language in existing law that prohibits the carrying of a firearm or switchblade 'on the person' with 'on or about the person.' This measure makes clear the legislature's intent regarding prohibitions on the unlawful carrying of concealed firearms and switchblade knives in purses, backpacks, fanny packs, brief cases, suitcases, or any other container by conforming statute to the recent Court of Appeal ruling. "In the case of People v. Pellecer (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 508, the Court of Appeal held that a knife concealed in a backpack was not a dirk or dagger 'carried concealed upon the person' as prohibited in Penal Code. The ruling in Pellecer has serious implications for the statutes prohibiting the carrying AB 2305 Page 3 of a firearm or switchblade knife concealed upon the person because they use the same language as used in the weapons sections involved in the decision. This bill replaces the term 'upon the person' found in Penal Code sections 21510(a) and 25400(a)(2), and 'on the person' found in Penal Code section 25850, with 'on or about the person' as suggested by the Court of Appeal in the Pellecer case." 2)Impetus for this Bill : In People v. Pellecer, supra, 215 Cal.App.4th 508, the defendant appealed his conviction for carrying a concealed dirk or dagger (former Pen. Code, § 12020, subd. (a)(4), now § 21310) because the knives he possessed were in a backpack and not "on his person" as required under the language of the statute. The court agreed that carrying a dirk or dagger in a backpack does not result in a violation of the statute, because the statute requires that the item be concealed "upon his or her person." (Id. at p. 512.) Applying the rules of statutory construction, the court concluded that the ordinary meaning of "upon his or her person" means on the body or in the clothing worn on the body. (Id. at p. 513.) The court found this interpretation was also supported by the legislative history of the statute. (Id. at pp. 514-515.) The Court also discussed the conflicting decision of People v. Dunn (1976) 61 Cal.App.3rd Supp. 12, which reached a contrary conclusion in interpreting former Penal Code section 12025 (possession of a concealable firearm). In that case, the appellate department of the superior court held that a concealable pistol found in a briefcase carried by the defendant was "sufficiently on the person" to be a violation of the statute. The court here ruled that the Dunn Court was simply wrong. (People v. Pellecer, supra, 215 Cal.App.4th at pp. 516-517.) Had the Legislature wanted to criminalize the possession of a dirk or dagger in a carried container, it would have used the phrase "on or about his or her person" rather than "upon his or her person." (People v. Pellecer, supra, 215 Cal.App.4th at p. 517.) "That the Legislature did not outlaw carrying a dirk or dagger in a backpack is understandable, given the utility of a knife in such lawful pursuits as fishing, hunting, camping, picknicking and the like." (Ibid.) The court recognized that other statutes criminalizing possession of weapons, such as shuriken, prohibit their possession per AB 2305 Page 4 se. (Id. at pp. 517-518.) This bill modifies three statutes relating to the possession of weapons to prohibit their carrying on or about the person: concealed firearms, loaded firearms, and switchblades. It does not change the law with respect to carrying a dirk or dagger, which was the statute at issue in Pellecer. 3)On or About the Person : Black's Law Dictionary defines the phrase "on or about the person" as follows: "As used in statutes making it an offense to carry a weapon 'on or about' the person, it is generally held that the word 'on' means connected with or attached to, and that 'about' is a comprehensive term having a broader meaning than 'on,' and conveying the idea of being nearby, in close proximity, within immediate reach, or conveniently accessible." (Black's Law Dict. (6th ed. 1990) p. 1089, col. 1.) Should the bill be amended to include a definition of the term in each of the relevant statutes in order to avoid confusion as to the meaning of the phrase? 4)Switchblades : Unlike some other knives, possession of a switchblade is not per se illegal in California. It is legal to buy a switchblade and to own one. However, there are strict laws regulating both the possession and sale of switchblades. Specifically, if a switchblade has a blade two inches or more in length, it is a misdemeanor to: (1) possess the knife in the passenger's or driver's area of a motor vehicle in any public place or place open to the public; (2) carry the knife upon the person, or (3) sell, offer or expose for sale, loan, transfer, or give the knife to anyone else. (Pen. Code, § 21510.) This bill will extend the prohibition of carrying the switchblade to cover not only upon the person, but also about the person. In contrast to the laws dealing with concealed firearms, there are no exemptions to carrying a switchblade, nor is it possible to obtain a permit to carry one. Also in contrast to firearms laws, there are also no provisions addressing how a switchblade is to be legally transported. Since the carrying prohibition is not limited to public places, would this law in effect ban switchblade? 5)Argument in Support : The Los Angeles District Attorney's Office , a co-sponsor of this bill, argues "AB 2305 would amend AB 2305 Page 5 California law as suggested by the Court of Appeal in the Pellecer decision to replace the language in existing law that prohibits the carrying of a firearm or switchblade 'on the person' with 'on or about the person.' "According to the California Attorney General, firearms were used in 71.2% of the murders committed in California in 2010. Of the murders that involved a firearm, handguns were used 54% of the time. Knives were used 14.2% of the time and blunt objects (clubs, etc.) were used 4.7% of the time. "According to 'Lost Youth: A County-by-County Analysis of 2011 California Homicide Victims Ages 10 to 24,' an annual study analyzing unpublished California Department of Justice Supplementary Homicide Report data released on March 6, 2013 by the Violence Policy Center, there were 631 homicide victims ages 10 to 24 in California in 2011. Of the 625 homicides for which the murder weapon could be identified, 83% of the victims died by gunfire. Of these, 73% were killed with handguns. "Our office believes that a proactive approach to address the potential loophole in California law regarding the concealed carrying of illegally possessed firearms and switchblades is necessary because of the dangerousness of these weapons in the hands of criminals. The Legislature should act now, because if the holding in Pellecer is extended to firearms and switchblades the result would be a danger to the public safety of Californians." 6)Arguments in Opposition : a) According to the National Rifle Association , "The intent of Assembly Bill 2305 is an effort by the Los Angeles District Attorneys Office to circumvent a recent California Court of appeals decision. The recent court decision People v. Pellecer, 215 Cal.App.4th 508 (2013) confirmed that individuals should not be held liable for unlawfully carrying items if they are properly stored in a backpack or purse, instead of directly on the person." b) The Outdoor Sportsmen's Coalition of California argues, "Of specific concern is the proposed addition of the words 'on or about' to Penal Code Sections 21510, 26400, and 25850. The term is no defined in the bill for purposes of AB 2305 Page 6 these sections, and it is very vague relative to what it would include. "There are numerous exceptions in existing law to the prohibitions in these sections, such as when traveling to or from, or while engaged in, a lawful activity such as practicing at a shooting range or while on a hunting trip on public lands. "Addition of the term 'on or about' as proposed in AB 2305 raises concerns over how the current lawful exceptions might be affected. There is also concern that the vagueness of the new term may be unconstitutionally vague, and that, if enacted, the matter would ultimately be decided by the courts." REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support Los Angeles County District Attorney (Co-Sponsor) San Diego County District Attorney (Co-Sponsor) Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence - California Chapters California District Attorneys Association California State Sheriffs' Association Opposition California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees California Rifle and Pistol Association California Sportsman Lobby Gun Owners of California National Rifle Association Outdoor Sportsmen's Coalition of California Analysis Prepared by : Sandy Uribe / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744