BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2365 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 7, 2014 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Mike Gatto, Chair AB 2365 (John A. Perez) - As Amended: April 24, 2014 Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:10-0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: SUMMARY This bill makes non-disparagement clauses void and unenforceable for certain consumer contracts. Specifically, this bill: 1)Makes a contract for the sale of consumer goods or services unlawful if it requires the consumer to waive the right to make any statement regarding experience with the seller or its employees or agents, unless the waiver was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. 2)Makes it unlawful to threaten or seek to enforce a contract provision made unlawful under (1) or to penalize a consumer for making any statement regarding their experience with the seller or its employees or agents, unless the waiver was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. 3)Creates a civil penalty of $2,500 for the first violation and $5,000 for subsequent violations, and makes a willful, intentional or reckless violation subject to a civil penalty of $10,000, all assessed under a civil action brought by the consumer, the Attorney General (AG), or a local prosecutor. 4)Makes the civil penalty payable to the consumer or the general fund of the agency bringing the action, as applicable. 5)Stipulates the above penalties are not an exclusive remedy from any other relief provided by law. FISCAL EFFECT Potential minor costs to the AG and local prosecutors for AB 2365 Page 2 enforcement, offset to some extent by revenue from civil penalties. COMMENTS Background and Purpose . Non-disparagement clauses generally restrict individuals from making statements or taking any other action that negatively impacts an organization, its reputation, products, services, management or employees. Non-disparagement clauses are commonly found in legal settlement agreements between employers and employees, where they can be negotiated and understood by both parties, who are typically represented by legal counsel. Recently, however, such clauses, which should only be used when both parties understand their effect and truly bargain for them, are finding their way into consumer transactions. With the advent of adhesion contracts in consumer transactions on the Internet, most consumers purchasing goods and services reasonably skip ahead to "check the box" at the end of the often ten thousand word online document, otherwise known as "click-wrap contracts," to complete the order. What consumers do not realize is that they are typically agreeing to terms that may be manifestly unfair and, in some cases, potentially muzzle constitutional rights. California and federal law do not yet make clear that such so-called non-disparagement clauses in these consumer contracts are void and unenforceable. This bill does so. Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081