BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO: ab 2393
          SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN              AUTHOR:  levine
                                                         VERSION: 2/21/14
          Analysis by:  Carrie Cornwell                  FISCAL:  yes
          Hearing date:  June 17, 2014



          SUBJECT:

          Vehicle registration surcharge:  fingerprint identification  
          systems

          DESCRIPTION:

          This bill authorizes counties to impose either a $1 or $2  
          vehicle registration surcharge to fund fingerprint  
          identification systems. 

          ANALYSIS:

          Existing law establishes a basic vehicle registration fee of  
          $46, plus a $24 surcharge for additional personnel for the  
          California Highway Patrol (CHP), for the new or renewal  
          registration of most vehicles.  Existing law also authorizes  
          local agencies to impose separate vehicle registration fee  
          surcharges in their respective jurisdictions for a variety of  
          special programs, including $1 for fingerprint identification  
          programs.  County boards of supervisors adopt resolutions  
          imposing the surcharge and declaring the purpose of and need for  
          the surcharge.  In counties that have imposed the surcharge,  
          commercial vehicles pay an additional $2 and other vehicles pay  
          an additional $1 with their vehicle registrations for the  
          fingerprint program.

          Existing law continuously appropriates the funds generated by  
          the $1 and $2 surcharges, which are collected by the Department  
          of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and disbursed by the State Controller,  
          to each county that has adopted the required resolution.   
          Counties may only spend these revenues to fund programs that  
          enhance the capacity of local law enforcement to provide  
          automated mobile and fixed-location fingerprint identification  
          of individuals who may be involved in driving under the  
          influence of alcohol or drugs, vehicular manslaughter, and other  
          vehicle-related crimes, as well as other crimes committed while  
          operating a motor vehicle.




          AB 2393 (LEVINE)                                       Page 2

                                                                       



          Every participating county must issue a fiscal year-end report  
          to the State Controller.  The State Controller must notify DMV  
          if a participating county either does not file the report or  
          does not expend the surcharge revenue for an authorized purpose.  
           In either instance, DMV suspends collection of the surcharge in  
          that county for a year.

           This bill  authorizes any county that has imposed a $1 vehicle  
          registration surcharge for fingerprint identification systems to  
          increase that surcharge to $2 through a resolution its board of  
          supervisors adopts.  In addition, a county without this  
          surcharge currently in place could choose to impose either a $1  
          or $2 surcharge through a resolution its board of supervisors  
          adopts.   Counties that impose $2 surcharges on their regular  
          vehicle registrations would automatically increase the surcharge  
          on commercial vehicles from $2 to $4 as well.  The county must  
          submit the resolution to DMV at least six months prior to the  
          date DMV will begin collecting the $2 surcharge.
          
          COMMENTS:

           1.Purpose of the bill  .  Since 1986, the State Department of  
            Justice has operated an automated fingerprint identification  
            program, known as Cal-ID.  This program is designed to assist  
            law enforcement agencies in various ways, including verifying  
            the identity of persons placed under arrest, identifying human  
            remains, and identifying criminal suspects by the use of  
            fingerprints.

            Local law enforcement agencies have access to the Cal-ID  
            system, but many agencies had, in the past, reported that the  
            necessary access equipment was antiquated and that they were  
            not financially able to take full advantage of the significant  
            advances in the related technology.  

            In light of these shortcomings, the Legislature enacted SB 720  
            (Lockyer), Chapter 587, Statutes of 1997, which authorized,  
            until January 1, 2003, participating counties to impose the $1  
            annual surcharge to fund local law enforcement use of  
            automated mobile and fixed-location fingerprint identification  
            equipment (live-scan).  AB 879 (Keeley), Chapter 986, Statutes  
            of 2002 extended the sunset date to 2006 and added  
            requirements for participating counties to report to the State  
            Controller and for the Controller to report to the Legislature  
            on the program.  In 2005, AB 857 (Bass), Chapter 470, extended  




          AB 2393 (LEVINE)                                       Page 3

                                                                       


            the sunset date until January 1, 2012, and then in 2011, AB  
            674 (Bonilla), Chapter 205, repealed the sunset date, making  
            the program permanent.  

            Although the program is permanent, the author introduced this  
            bill to restore some of the lost purchasing power of the $1  
            surcharge, which has not changed since the inception of the  
            program 17 years ago.  In addition, proponents note that this  
            increase would enable law enforcement to take advantage of  
            advances in fingerprinting technology.

           2.Opposition  .  Opponents argue that the fee increase proposed in  
            this bill runs afoul of Constitutional provisions governing  
            the imposition of special taxes, namely that imposition of  
            such a tax requires a two-thirds vote of the electorate.  

           3.Vote of the people  .  The people passed Proposition 26 in  
            November 2010, and so amended the California Constitution to  
            require that any "change in statute which results in a  
            taxpayer paying a higher tax must be imposed by an act passed  
            by not less than two-thirds of all members elected to each of  
            the two houses of the Legislature."  This bill does not result  
            in a taxpayer paying a higher tax but delegates to county  
            boards of supervisors the authority to impose a higher  
            surcharge on vehicle registrations to fund a specific  
            government function.  Ultimately, county counsels will have to  
            determine a vote threshold at the county level.  So while this  
            bill is a majority vote measure in the Legislature, the local  
            action to increase the registration surcharge may be a  
            two-thirds vote of the electorate in a county.
          
          Assembly Votes:
               Floor:    42-31
               Appr: 12-5
               L Gov:  6-3
               Trans:      9-6
          POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the committee before noon on  
          Wednesday,                                             June 11,  
          2014.)

               SUPPORT:  California State Sheriffs' Association (sponsor) 
                                   Alameda County Sheriff's Office 
                                   California Association of Crime  
                    Laboratory Directors 
                                   California District Attorneys  
                    Association




          AB 2393 (LEVINE)                                       Page 4

                                                                       


                                   California State Association of  
                    Counties 
                         Contra Costa County 
                         County of San Mateo Office of the Sheriff 
                                   Napa County Office of Sheriff-Coroner 
                                   Orange County Sheriff's Department  
                                   Sheriff-Coroner, Santa Cruz County
                                   Sheriff's Office, County of Kern 

               OPPOSED:  California Car Clubs
                         California Taxpayers Association
                         Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association