BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 2402
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 30, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                AB 2402 (Buchanan) - As Introduced:  February 21, 2014

          Policy Committee:                               
          AgricultureVote:7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill makes an appropriation of $2.5 million from the  
          General Fund (GF) to the Noxious Weed Management Account (NWMA)  
          administered by the California Department of Food and  
          Agriculture (CDFA) to renew activities under the noxious weed  
          management program, and makes changes to the distribution of  
          NWMA funds to increase the percentage allocated to research,  
          risk assessment, and control strategies.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)One-time appropriation of $2.5 million from GF to the NWMA.

          2)Estimated costs to the NWMA of approximately $115,000 per year  
            for the first three years to cover CDFA administration of the  
            program.

           COMMENTS  

          1)  Purpose.   Noxious and invasive weeds have had a significant  
            economic impact on the state through lower agricultural  
            productivity, increased fire risk, increased consumption of  
            water, and other resource degradation.  Invasive weeds disrupt  
            native ecosystems and crowd out native California plant  
            species, spoiling recreational opportunities and negatively  
            affecting the value of public lands.

          2)  Competition for water.   Management of noxious weeds is  
            arguably more important in drought years.  Weeds compete with  
            crops and other local plants for water, limiting agricultural  
            yields and forcing farmers and ranchers to spend millions in  








                                                                  AB 2402
                                                                  Page  2

            order to protect their plantings.  This bill adds a  
            requirement that a weed management program demonstrate it will  
            increase water supply and flow in order to be eligible for  
            funding.

          3)  Re-allocation of NWMA funds.   This bill makes the following  
            changes to the allocation of NWMA funds:

             a)   Increases from 10% to 20% the allocation for grants to  
               fund research on the biology and management of noxious  
               weeds and risk assessment, mapping, and prioritization of  
               various noxious weeds.

             b)   Increases from 10% to 20% the allocation to CDFA for  
               developing noxious weed control strategies and effective  
               biological control agents, educational efforts, and program  
               management.

             c)   Decreases from 80% to 60% the allocation for grants to  
               weed management areas and county agricultural commissioners  
               for control and abatement programs.

          4)  Noxious weed management program background.   The noxious weed  
            management program began in 1999 with a $200,000 annual, three  
            year appropriation.  In 2000, another $5 million was  
            appropriated to fund weed management project grants.

            Since the program's creation, $16.1 million in private funding  
            and resources have matched the $5.6 million appropriated state  
            dollars.  No additional funds have been appropriated since  
            2000 and, following the allocation of those grant funds, the  
            program has been idle.

            Eradication of noxious weeds has been shown to provide  
            long-term economic savings to local, state, and federal  
            governments and agencies as well.  For example, the State of  
            Oregon found that the exclusion or eradication of six species  
            on the Oregon noxious weed list (five of which are also on  
            California's list) resulted in over $50 million in savings to  
            that state.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Joel Tashjian / APPR. / (916) 319-2081 










                                                                  AB 2402
                                                                  Page  3