BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó







         ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |Hearing Date:June 16, 2014         |Bill No:AB                         |
        |                                   |2451                               |
         ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 


                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS 
                               AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
                              Senator Ted W. Lieu, Chair
                                           

                          Bill No:        AB 2451Author:Daly
                        As Amended:  June 10, 2014Fiscal:  Yes

        
        SUBJECT:  Weights and measures: water submeters.
        
        SUMMARY:  Authorizes the installation of a water submeter that was  
        inspected, tested, and sealed by a sealer of another county;  
        authorizes a county to establish and collect fees to cover the actual  
        costs of inspecting, calibrating, testing, and certifying water  
        submeters; requires a sealer to mark a water submeter that is found to  
        be incorrect, with the words "Out of Order" and allows the submeter to  
        be returned to the manufacturer under certain conditions.

        Existing law:
        
       1)Provides that the Division of Measurement Standards (DMS) within the  
          Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA) has general enforcement  
          supervision of the laws relating to weights and measures and  
          measuring devices, and provides for the enforcement of those laws  
          and the inspection and testing of measuring devices in each county  
          by the county sealer.

       2)Requires the DFA to adopt regulations governing the inspection  
          frequency of all commercially used weights, measures, and weighing  
          and measuring apparatuses in the state, and requires the county  
          sealer of each county to perform the inspections required by DFA.   
          (Business and Professions Code (BPC) § 12212)

        3) Authorizes a county to collect a fee, as specified, from the owner  
           or user for the inspection or testing of any weighing or measuring  
           device.  (BPC § 12210.5)

        4) Requires that a person who uses, or intends to use, any weight or  





                                                                        AB 2451
                                                                         Page 2



           measure, or weighing or measuring device for commercial purposes,  
           shall cause that device to be sealed by a sealer before use, unless  
           it has been sealed before sale, in which case the purchaser may use  
           it for the period authorized for its use. (BPC § 12501.1) 

       5)Defines, for purposes of weighing and measuring devices, the term  
          "placed in service" as permitting the use of a device that has been  
          tested and found to be correct, as specified, or to submit a device  
          to a sealer for verification prior to installation. (BPC § 12531)

       6)Provides that a device may only be placed in service by a sealer or a  
          service agency who repairs a commercial device. (BPC § 12509)

        7) Requires a sealer to condemn and seize, and authorizes the  
           destruction, of any incorrect weights and measures and weighing and  
           measuring instruments used for commercial purposes.  The sealer may  
           additionally mark or tag an incorrect device with the words "Out of  
           order."  (BPC § 12506)

       8)Makes it a misdemeanor for any person to do certain acts in violation  
          of the weights and measures law, including use, for commercial  
          purposes, or retain in his or her possession an incorrect weight or  
          measure or weighing or measuring instrument. (BPC § 12510)

        This bill:

       1)Requires the county sealer, who possesses the appropriate equipment,  
          to perform tests on water submeters, to inspect, calibrate, test,  
          and certify the accuracy of a water submeter within the county and  
          upon written request of the owner, user, or operator of the water  
          submeter, in any of the following instances:

           a)   The service is requested to be performed in addition to, or  
             according to different schedule than the inspection schedule  
             established by regulations.

           b)   The requested service for a water submeter that is not  
             intended to be placed into service in the county within six  
             months.

           c)   The requested service pertains to a water submeter intended to  
             be placed into service in a different county.

       2)Authorizes a county board of supervisors to authorize the sealer to  
          establish and collect fees to cover the actual costs of inspecting,  
          calibrating, testing, and certifying water submeters.





                                                                        AB 2451
                                                                         Page 3




       3)Provides for a county sealer to authorize the installation of a water  
          submeter that has been inspected, tested, and sealed by a sealer of  
          another county if the following conditions are met:

           a)   The meter bears the current seal of the county in which the  
             water submeter was inspected (in accordance with the provisions  
             of Section 12505).

           b)   The water submeter is installed within 12 months of being  
             inspected, tested and sealed.

           c)   The sealer has no reason to believe the water submeter has  
             been tampered with, damaged, or otherwise rendered inoperable.

       4)Requires a sealer to mark a water submeter submitted for inspection  
          and testing before its initial installation that is found to be  
          incorrect, as defined, with the words, "Out of Order" and allows the  
          submeter to be returned if:

           a)   The submeter does not have signs of intentional tampering to  
             facilitate fraud.

           b)   The submeter will not be placed in service in California.

       5)Provides that an owner, user, or operator shall not be subject to  
          criminal prosecution or liable for other fines or penalties, if a  
          water submeter that has been installed is found to be incorrect,  
          subject to the following:

           a)   The water submeter was one of a submeter lot that had been  
             previously sample tested by a sealer, as specified.

           b)   The water submeter had not been previously tested by a sealer  
             and found to be correct.

           c)   The water submeter has not been found by the sealer to have  
             signs of intentional tampering, damage or alteration, as  
             specified.

           d)   The owner, user, or operator has maintained the water  
             submeter, as specified.

           e)   A water submeter that meets these conditions shall not be  
             reinstalled and placed into commercial use unless it is repaired  
             and recalibrated, as specified, and approved by the sealer.





                                                                        AB 2451
                                                                         Page 4




       6)Deletes from the definition of "placed in service" the submission of  
          a device to a sealer for verification prior to the device's  
          installation. 

       7)Makes technical, updating and conforming changes.
        

        FISCAL EFFECT:  This measure has been keyed "fiscal" by Legislative  
        Counsel.  The May 7, 2014 Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis  
        cites negligible state costs.  Counties are given fee authority to  
        cover their costs.

        
        COMMENTS:
        
       1.Purpose.  This bill is sponsored by the  California Apartment  
          Association  and the  Utility Management and Conservation Association   
          in order to make several changes dealing with the approval of water  
          submeters for use in California, including:

               Allows the use of sealed submeters statewide, regardless of  
             what county tested them;
               Redefines "placed in service" to eliminate unintended  
             liability for submeter manufacturers; and,
               Adds language that sets a procedure for disposing of water  
             submeters that fail to pass state testing.

          The Author believes that California law regarding the testing and  
          use of submeters discourages manufacturers from shipping submeters  
          to California.  This, in turn, negatively impacts the construction  
          and use of multifamily rental units and the availability of properly  
          functioning submeters.  

          According to the Author, existing law is silent on the issue of  
          using a submeter that is tested in another county; however, the  
          practice in the field is to test the submeter in the county where  
          that submeter is to be used.  This bill would allow a submeter  
          sealed in any county in California to be used in any other county.

          The Author further contends that the "placed-in-service" definition  
          creates liability for manufacturers who simply ship submeters which  
          ultimately fail testing yet are not actually installed.  This bill  
          revises the definition of "placed in service" to no longer provide  
          that a submeter is "placed into service" when it is simply submitted  
          to a sealer for testing.  





                                                                        AB 2451
                                                                         Page 5




          The Author also indicates that the current law permits the  
          destruction of submeters which fail testing by a county sealer.  The  
          Author states the manufacturers, with no intention to attempt to use  
          them in California, would like the failed submeters returned to  
          them.  This bill provides that a failed submeter may be returned to  
          a manufacturer if the sealer does not find an indication that the  
          submeter has been tampered with, and if the submeter will not be  
          used in California.

       1.Background.  The largest, least expensive and most environmentally  
          sound source of water to meet California's future needs is the water  
          currently being wasted in every sector of our economy, according to  
          a Pacific Institute report, Waste Not, Want Not:  The Potential for  
          Urban Water Conservation in California.  The report indicates that  
          California's urban water needs can be met in the foreseeable future  
          by reducing water waste through cost-effective water-saving  
          technologies, revised economic policies, appropriate state and local  
          regulations, and public education.  

       Water submeters provide a critically important tool in the state's  
          efforts to increase water conservation.  The U.S. Environmental  
          Protection Agency (EPA) estimated that installing water submeters in  
          multifamily units reduced water consumption by an average of 28%.   
          These results are consistent and in line with California's goal of  
          reducing water usage by 20% by 2020.

       2.Use of Submeters.  A submeter is a device that measures water  
          consumption of an individual rental unit within a multi-unit  
          building or facility.  Before the use of submeters, many landlords  
          either included the utility cost in the bulk price of the rent or  
          lease, or divided the utility usage among the tenants in some way  
          such as equally, by square footage, or some other means.  Without a  
          meter to measure individual usage, there is less incentive to  
          conserve or stop water leaks, since the other tenants or landlord  
          may pay all or part of those costs.  Submetering creates awareness  
          of water conservation since the tenant will pay for all of their  
          usage and any leaks they allow to remain unrepaired.  Conservation  
          also allows property owners to keep the cost of rent reasonable and  
          fair for all units regardless of how much water or energy they  
          consume.
       
        3. Related Legislation.   SB 750  (Wolk, 2013-2014 Session) requires  
           individual water meters, also called submeters, to be installed on  
           all new multifamily residential units or mixed commercial and  
           multifamily units and requires that landlords bill residents for  





                                                                        AB 2451
                                                                         Page 6



           the increment of water they use.  Specifies landlord and tenant  
           rights and obligations.  (  Status  :  SB 750 failed passage in  
           Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee in August 2013, and  
           was granted reconsideration.)

         SB 744  (Wyland, 2011) would have amended the definition of "placed in  
           service" to provide that a water submeter is not considered "placed  
           in service" prior to its installation, if the water submeter is to  
           be used in a multi-unit residential structure.  The bill further  
           provided that any water submeter tested by standards promulgated by  
           the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall be deemed  
           to be sealed and approved for commercial use, as specified.  The  
           bill was vetoed by the Governor citing that by allowing non-sealers  
           to verify the accuracy of these commercial devices, the bill  
           removes the Department of Food and Agriculture's cornerstone tenet  
           of weights and measures protections for the public.  (  Status  :  SB  
           744 was vetoed by the Governor.)

         AB 19  (Fong, 2011) would have mandated that water purveyors adopt  
           policies requiring that multiunit residential structures or mixed  
           use residential and commercial structures that apply for water  
           connections after January 1, 2014, have, as a condition of new  
           water service, submeters that measure the water supplied to each  
           individual dwelling unit.  (  Status  :  AB 19 was held in Assembly  
           Housing and Community Development Committee.)

         AB 1975  (Fong, 2010), similar to AB 19, required multiunit residential  
           structures or mixed use residential and commercial structures to  
           add, as a condition of new service, water meters or submeters that  
           measure the water supplied to each individual unit.  (  Status  :  AB  
           1975 was held on Suspense in the Senate Appropriations Committee.)

         AB 1173  (Keene, 2007) also similar to AB 19, required water suppliers  
           to require, for all multiunit residential structures (apartment  
           complexes) for which a construction permit is issued, the  
           installation of meters or submeters on each rental unit as a  
           condition for providing water service.  Both AB 1975 and AB 1173  
           faced serious concerns regarding potential impacts to low income  
           tenants.  (  Status  :  AB 1173 was held in the Assembly Appropriations  
           Committee.)

         AB 2121  (Kehoe, 2002) would have exempted submeters for multifamily  
           residential and multitenant commercial property from county  
           requirements specifying that water submeters must be tested and  
           sealed by a licensed county sealer before installation.   (  Status  :   
           AB 2121 was held in the Assembly Rules Committee.)





                                                                        AB 2451
                                                                         Page 7




         SB 1368  (Kuehl, 2002) would have required DFA to adopt regulations to  
           establish tolerances and specifications for water submetering  
           devices used to determine water usage in multifamily units that are  
           served by a single water meter of a regulated or municipally owned  
           utility.  (  Status  :  SB 1368 was held in the Assembly Rules  
           Committee.)

       4.Arguments in Support.  The sponsors of the bill, the  California  
          Apartment Association  (CAA) and the  Utility Management and  
          Conservation  (UMCA) write in support that "AB 2451 addresses a  
          problem that apartment builders face today which is a lack of supply  
          and availability of water submeters for use in California. Submeter  
          manufacturers have informed us that some of California's rules and  
          regulations have made shipping the devices to the state too risky.   
          Without compromising the quality and content of California's testing  
          and certification of these devices, AB 2451 makes the state's  
          regulations and corresponding procedures more flexible so that an  
          adequate supply of state-approved submeters is available when  
          needed. AB 2451 revises certain provisions of the Business and  
          Professions Code with the intent to help improve the availability of  
          approved water submeters.  UMCA and CAA believe that this bill will  
          reduce the uncertainty in California associated with submeter  
          availability and will ensure there is a ready supply when needed -  
          when new multifamily housing is about to begin construction.  In  
          that way, California can more systematically improve water  
          conservation while supporting the resurgence of housing  
          construction.

        The Western Center on Law & Poverty  and the  California Rural Legal  
          Assistance Foundation (CRLAF)  states that the bill would streamline  
          the approval process for water submeters in several important  
          respects, while assuring that the submeters placed in service have a  
          high degree of accuracy.  This in turn will help make submeters  
          available on a wider basis.  

        The California Building Industry Association  (CBIA) argues that  
          California is home to the nation's most ambitious water conservation  
          goals and the state must ensure that its policies provide the means  
          to achieve those goals.  Central to those needed policies, according  
          to CBIA, is assurance that an adequate supply of sub-meters for use  
          in multifamily housing is available. CBIA states, "California's  
          multifamily builders strive to comply with state and local water  
          conservation goals.  Unfortunately, the lack of access, fear of  
          civil liability, and absence of state support to obtain water meters  
          is dramatically hurting the cause.  As the state faces the worst  





                                                                        AB 2451
                                                                         Page 8



          drought in modern times, it's imperative that all industries strive  
          to conserve every last drop of water."

        American Utility Management  (AUM) states that current California rules  
          and regulations have created problems for submeter manufacturers  
          that ship devices to the State.  "This has resulted in an uncertain  
          future for water submeters at a time when we need them the most to  
          conserve our scarce water supply.  According to a study by the U.S.  
          Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), water use where submeters are  
          installed can, on average, reduce water use by 28% each month."  The  
          bill streamlines the regulatory process to ensure ready access to  
          water submeters, according to AUM.

        California Association of Realtors  (CAR) argues that the bill creates  
          flexibility in the regulatory environment governing water meter  
          production that will generate better availability of state-approved  
          submeters and permit submeters to be tested in one county and used  
          in other California counties. 

        San Diego County Apartment Association  states that the City of San  
          Diego passed an ordinance in 2010 mandating that submeters be  
          installed in all new rental housing construction.  This bill will  
          ensure an adequate supply of submeters in California for  
          installation in rental housing.


        SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION:
        
         Support:  

        California Apartment Association (Sponsor) 
        Utility Management and Conservation Association (Sponsor)
        American Utility Management
        Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles
        California Association of Realtors
        California Building Industry Association
        California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation 
        MeterNet USA
        Multifamily Utility Company
        Natural Resource Management, Inc.
        Northwestern Utility Billing Services, Inc.
        San Diego County Apartment Association
        Santa Barbara Rental Property Association
        Urban Meters & Readers, Inc.
        Western Center on Law and Poverty






                                                                        AB 2451
                                                                         Page 9




         Opposition:  

        None received as of June 11, 2014.



        Consultant:G. V. Ayers