Amended in Senate August 4, 2014

Amended in Senate July 1, 2014

Amended in Senate May 21, 2014

Amended in Assembly April 10, 2014

Amended in Assembly March 28, 2014

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 2485


Introduced by Assembly Members Dickinson and Ridley-Thomas

February 21, 2014


An act to amend Section 3486 of, and to add and repeal Section 3486.5 of the Civil Code, relating to civil law, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 2485, as amended, Dickinson. Unlawful detainer: nuisance: controlled substances.

Existing law establishes the criteria for determining when a tenant is guilty of unlawful detainer, including conduct involving illegally selling a controlled substance, or the commission of an offense involving the unlawful possession or use of illegal weapons or ammunition or the use of the premises to further that purpose. Any of those acts may be deemed to constitute committing a nuisance on the premises. Existing law authorizes, for real property situated in the City of Los Angeles only, a city prosecutor or city attorney to file an action for unlawful detainer in the name of the people against any person who is in violation of the nuisance or the illegal purpose provisions of the unlawful detainer provision described above, with respect to controlled substances.

This bill would, until January 1, 2019, extend the unlawful detainer provisions above regarding illegally selling controlled substances, applicable only to real property situated in the City of Los Angeles, to also include real property situated in the County of Sacramento and the City of Oakland.begin delete The bill would prohibit an unlawful detainer action pursuant to these provisions if the harm to the tenant clearly outweighs the benefit to the community.end deletebegin insert The bill would require a court hearing an unlawful detainer action pursuant to these provisions to enter a specified order depending on whether grounds for an eviction or a partial eviction have been established. The court would have discretion to dismiss the action or stay the execution of an order of eviction for a reasonable time if the tenant can show, by clear and convincing evidence, that immediate eviction would pose extreme hardship that outweighs the benefit to the community.end insert The bill would also, until January 1, 2019, require the County of Sacramento and the City of Oakland to comply with specified reporting requirements to the California Research Bureau, on or before January 20 annually, regarding prosecutions and evictions carried out under these provisions. The bill would require these jurisdictions to make a good faith effort to comply with the reporting requirements in order to bring unlawful detainer actions pursuant to these provisions. By establishing new reporting requirements for local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Sacramento and the City of Oakland.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Vote: 23. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P3    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 3486 of the Civil Code is amended to
2read:

3

3486.  

(a) To abate the nuisance caused by illegal conduct
4involving a controlled substance purpose on real property, the city
5prosecutor or city attorney may file, in the name of the people, an
6action for unlawful detainer against any person who is in violation
7of the nuisance or illegal purpose provisions of subdivision 4 of
8Section 1161 of the Code of Civil Procedure, with respect to that
9controlled substance purpose. In filing this action, which shall be
10based upon an arrest report by a law enforcement agency, reporting
11an offense committed on the property and documented by the
12observations of a police officer, the city prosecutor or city attorney
13shall use the procedures set forth in Chapter 4 (commencing with
14Section 1159) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure,
15except that in cases filed under this section, the following also
16shall apply:

17(1) (A) Prior to filing an action pursuant to this section, the city
18prosecutor or city attorney shall give 30 calendar days’ written
19notice to the owner, requiring the owner to file an action for the
20removal of the person who is in violation of the nuisance or illegal
21purpose provisions of subdivision 4 of Section 1161 of the Code
22of Civil Procedure with respect to a controlled substance purpose.

23(B) This notice shall include sufficient documentation
24establishing a violation of the nuisance or illegal purpose provisions
25of subdivision 4 of Section 1161 of the Code of Civil Procedure
26and an advisement to the owner of the assignment provision
27contained in subparagraph (D). The notice shall be served upon
28the owner and the tenant in accordance with subdivision (e).

29(C) The notice to the tenant shall, in at least 14-point bold type,
30meet the following requirements:

31(i) The notice shall contain the following language:

32

33“(Date)

34

35(Name of tenant)

36(Address of tenant)

37

38Re: Civil Code Section 3486

P4    1

2Dear (name of tenant):

3

4This letter is to inform you that an eviction action may soon be
5filed in court against you for suspected drug activity. According
6to state law, Civil Code Section 3486 provides for eviction of
7persons engaging in such conduct, as described below.

8

9(Name of police department) records indicate that you, (name
10of arrestee), were arrested on (date) for violations of (list violations)
11on (address of property).

12

13A letter has been sent to the property owner(s) advising of your
14arrest and the requirements of state law, as well as the landlord’s
15option to assign the unlawful detainer action to the (name of city
16attorney or prosecutor’s office).

17

18A list of legal assistance providers is provided below. Please
19note, this list is not exclusive and is provided for your information
20only; the (name of city attorney or prosecutor’s office) does not
21endorse or recommend any of the listed agencies.

22

23Sincerely,

24

25(Name of deputy city attorney or city prosecutor)

26Deputy City (Attorney or Prosecutor)

27

28Notice to Tenant: This notice is not a notice of eviction. You
29should call (name of the city attorney or prosecutor pursuing the
30action) at (telephone number) or a legal assistance provider to stop
31the eviction action if any of the following is applicable:

32(1) You are not the person named in this notice.

33(2) The person named in the notice does not live with you.

34(3) The person named in the notice has permanently moved.

35(4) You do not know the person named in the notice.

36(5) You want to request that only the person involved in the
37nuisance be evicted, allowing the other residents to stay.

38(6) You have any other legal defense or legal reason to stop the
39eviction action.

P5    1A list of legal assistance providers is attached to this notice.
2Some provide free legal assistance if you are eligible.”

3

4(ii) The notice shall be provided to the tenant in English and,
5as translated, in all of the languages identified in subdivision (a)
6of Section 1632 of the Civil Code.

7(D) The owner shall, within 30 calendar days of the mailing of
8the written notice, either provide the city prosecutor or city attorney
9with all relevant information pertaining to the unlawful detainer
10case, or provide a written explanation setting forth any
11safety-related reasons for noncompliance, and an assignment to
12the city prosecutor or city attorney of the right to bring an unlawful
13detainer action against the tenant.

14(E) The assignment shall be on a form provided by the city
15prosecutor or city attorney and may contain a provision for costs
16of investigation, discovery, and reasonable attorney’s fees, in an
17amount not to exceed six hundred dollars ($600). An owner shall
18only be required to pay the costs or fees upon acceptance of the
19assignment and the filing of the action for unlawful detainer by
20the city prosecutor or city attorney.

21(F) If the city prosecutor or city attorney accepts the assignment
22of the right of the owner to bring the unlawful detainer action, the
23owner shall retain all other rights and duties, including the handling
24of the tenant’s personal property, following issuance of the writ
25of possession and its delivery to and execution by the appropriate
26agency.

27(2) Upon the failure of the owner to file an action pursuant to
28this section, or to respond to the city prosecutor or city attorney
29as provided in paragraph (1), or having filed an action, if the owner
30fails to prosecute it diligently and in good faith, the city prosecutor
31or city attorney may file and prosecute the action, and join the
32owner as a defendant in the action. This action shall have
33precedence over any similar proceeding thereafter brought by the
34owner, or to one previously brought by the owner and not
35prosecuted diligently and in good faith. Service of the summons
36and complaint upon the defendant owner shall be in accordance
37with Sections 415.10, 415.20, 415.30, 415.40, and 415.50 of the
38Code of Civil Procedure.

39(3) If a jury or court finds the defendant tenant guilty of unlawful
40detainer in a case filed pursuant to paragraph (2), the city
P6    1prosecutor or city attorney may be awarded costs, including the
2costs of investigation and discovery and reasonable attorney’s fees.
3These costs shall be assessed against the defendant owner, to whom
4notice was directed pursuant to paragraph (1), and once an abstract
5of judgment is recorded, it shall constitute a lien on the subject
6real property.

7(4) Nothing in this section shall prevent a local governing body
8from adopting and enforcing laws, consistent with this article,
9relating to drug abatement. Where local laws duplicate or
10supplement this section, this section shall be construed as providing
11alternative remedies and not preempting the field.

12(5) Nothing in this section shall prevent a tenant from receiving
13relief against a forfeiture of a lease pursuant to Section 1179 of
14the Code of Civil Procedure.

15(b) In any proceeding brought under this section, the court may,
16upon a showing of good cause, issue a partial eviction ordering
17the removal of any person, including, but not limited to, members
18of the tenant’s household if the court finds that the person has
19engaged in the activities described in subdivision (a). Persons
20removed pursuant to this section may be permanently barred from
21returning to or reentering any portion of the entire premises. The
22court may further order as an express condition of the tenancy that
23the remaining tenants shall not give permission to or invite any
24person who has been removed pursuant to this subdivision to return
25to or reenter any portion of the entire premises.

26(c) For the purposes of this section, “controlled substance
27purpose” means the manufacture, cultivation, importation into the
28state, transportation, possession, possession for sale, sale,
29furnishing, administering, or giving away, or providing a place to
30use or fortification of a place involving, cocaine, phencyclidine,
31heroin, methamphetamine, or any other controlled substance, in a
32violation of subdivision (a) of Section 11350, Section 11351,
3311351.5, 11352, or 11359, subdivision (a) of Section 11360, or
34Section 11366, 11366.6, 11377, 11378, 11378.5, 11379, 11379.5,
3511379.6, or 11383 of the Health and Safety Code.

36(d) Notwithstanding subdivision (b) of Section 68097.2 of the
37Government Code, a public entity may waive all or part of the
38costs incurred in furnishing the testimony of a peace officer in an
39unlawful detainer action brought pursuant to this section.

P7    1(e) The notice and documentation described in paragraph (1)
2of subdivision (a) shall be given in writing and may be given either
3by personal delivery or by deposit in the United States mail in a
4sealed envelope, postage prepaid, addressed to the owner at the
5address known to the public entity giving the notice, or as shown
6on the last equalized assessment roll, if not known. Separate notice
7of not less than 30 calendar days and documentation shall be
8provided to the tenant in accordance with this subdivision. Service
9by mail shall be deemed to be completed at the time of deposit in
10the United States mail. Proof of giving the notice may be made by
11a declaration signed under penalty of perjury by any employee of
12the public entity which shows service in conformity with this
13section.

begin delete

14(f) A city prosecutor or city attorney shall not file an unlawful
15detainer action against a person pursuant to this section if the harm
16that the action would cause to that person clearly outweighs the
17benefits to the community.

end delete
begin insert

18(f) In an unlawful detainer action filed pursuant to this section,
19the court shall make one of the following orders:

end insert
begin insert

20(1) If the grounds for an eviction have not been established
21pursuant to this section, the court shall dismiss, without prejudice,
22the unlawful detainer action.

end insert
begin insert

23(2) If the grounds for an eviction have been established pursuant
24to this section, the court shall do either of the following:

end insert
begin insert

25(A) Order that the tenant and all occupants be immediately
26evicted from the property.

end insert
begin insert

27(B) Dismiss the unlawful detainer action with or without
28prejudice or stay execution of an eviction order for a reasonable
29length of time if the tenant establishes by clear and convincing
30evidence that the immediate eviction would pose an extreme
31hardship to the tenant and that this hardship outweighs the health,
32safety, or welfare of the neighbors or surrounding community.
33However, the court may not find an extreme hardship solely on
34the basis on an economic hardship or the financial inability of the
35tenant to pay for and secure other housing or lodging
36accommodations.

end insert
begin insert

37(3) If the grounds for a partial eviction have been established
38pursuant to subdivision (b), the court shall order that those persons
39be immediately removed and barred from the property, but the
40court may not order the tenancy be terminated.

end insert

P8    1(g) This section shall apply only in the County of Los Angeles
2to any court having jurisdiction over unlawful detainer cases
3involving real property situated in the City of Los Angeles.

4(h) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2014,
5only if the City of Los Angeles has regularly reported to the
6California Research Bureau as required by this section as it read
7during the period from January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2014,
8inclusive. For purposes of this section, the City of Los Angeles
9shall be deemed to have complied with this reporting requirement
10if the 2013 report to the Legislature by the California Research
11Bureau indicates that the City of Los Angeles has regularly reported
12to the bureau.

13

SEC. 2.  

Section 3486.5 is added to the Civil Code, to read:

14

3486.5.  

(a) Notwithstanding subdivisionbegin delete (f)end deletebegin insert (g)end insert of Section
153486, Section 3486 shall apply in the County of Sacramento, in
16any court with jurisdiction over unlawful detainer cases involving
17real property situated in the City of Sacramento and in the County
18of Alameda in any court having jurisdiction over unlawful detainer
19cases involving real property situated in the City of Oakland.

20(b) (1) In a template provided by the California Research
21Bureau, the city attorney and city prosecutor of the County of
22Sacramento and the city attorney and city prosecutor of the City
23of Oakland shall provide to the California Research Bureau the
24following information pertaining to cases filed pursuant to Section
253486:

26(A) The number of notices provided pursuant to paragraph (1)
27of subdivision (a) of Section 3486.

28(B) For each notice provided pursuant to paragraph (1) of
29subdivision (a) of Section 3486, the following information:

30(i) The name and age, as provided by the landlord, of each
31person residing at the noticed address.

32(ii) The racial or ethnic identity of the tenant against whom the
33unlawful detainer is sought.

34(iii) Whether the person has previously received a notice
35pursuant to this section from the reporting city attorney or city
36prosecutor, and if so, whether the tenant vacated or was evicted
37as a result.

38(iv) The date the initial notice was issued.

P9    1(C) Whether the tenant has previously been arrested (other than
2an arrest that is the basis of this notice) for any of the offenses
3specified in subdivision (c) of Section 3486.

4(D) Whether, upon notice, the case was filed by the owner, and
5if so, the filing date and case number.

6(E) Whether the assignment was executed by the owner to the
7city attorney or prosecutor.

8(F) Whether 3-day, 30-day, or 60-day notices were issued by
9the city attorney or city prosecutor, and if so, the date each was
10issued.

11(G) Whether the case was filed by the city attorney or city
12prosecutor, and if so, the filing date and case number.

13(H) Whether the owner is joined as a defendant pursuant to this
14section.

15(I) For the cases filed by an owner, the city attorney, or the city
16prosecutor, the following information:

17(i) If a judgment was entered, the date of the judgment, whether
18the judgment ordered an eviction or partial eviction, and whether
19the judgment was a default judgment, stipulated judgment, or
20judgment following trial.

21(ii) Whether the case was withdrawn or the tenant prevailed.

22(iii) Whether there was another disposition, and the type of
23disposition.

24(iv) Whether the defendant was represented by counsel.

25(v) Whether the case was a trial by the court or a trial by jury.

26(vi) Whether an appeal was taken, and, if so, the result of the
27appeal and the date of the result.

28(vii) Whether a partial eviction was requested, and whether the
29court ordered a partial eviction.

30(J) For cases in which a notice was provided pursuant to
31subdivision (a) of Section 3486, but no case was filed, the
32following information:

33(i) Whether a tenant voluntarily vacated subsequent to receiving
34the notice, and if so, the date vacated.

35(ii) Whether a tenant vacated a unit prior to the providing of the
36notice, and if so, the date vacated.

37(iii) Whether the notice provided pursuant to subdivision (a) of
38Section 3486 was erroneously sent to the tenant. This shall include
39a list of the reasons, if known, for the erroneously sent notice, such
P10   1as reliance on information on the suspected violator’s name or
2address that was incorrect, a clerical error, or other reason.

3(iv) Whether there was another resolution and the type of
4resolution.

5(K) The street address, city, and ZIP Code of residence where
6the tenants relocated, to the extent known.

7(L) Whether the tenant continued to engage in unlawful activity
8at his or her new place of residence, to the extent known.

9(2) (A)   Information compiled pursuant to this section shall be
10reported annually to the California Research Bureau on or before
11January 20.

12(B) The California Research Bureau shall thereafter submit a
13brief report to the Senate and Assembly Committees on Judiciary
14once on or before March 20, 2016, and once on or before March
1520, 2018, summarizing the information collected pursuant to this
16section and evaluating the merits of the pilot programs established
17by this section. The report for this section shall be submitted in
18compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code and may
19be combined with the California Research Bureau report submitted
20 for the pilot program established by Section 3485. The 2018 report
21shall indicate whether the City of Sacramento and the City of
22Oakland have regularly reported to the bureau.

23(3) Personally identifiable information submitted to the
24California Research Bureau pursuant to this section shall be
25confidential and shall not be publicly disclosed.

26(c) A participating jurisdiction shall not be permitted to file, in
27the name of the people, an action for unlawful detainer pursuant
28to this section unless that jurisdiction has made a good faith effort
29to collect and timely report all information to the California
30Research Bureau required by subdivision (b).

31(d) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2019,
32and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that
33is enacted before January 1, 2019, deletes or extends that date.

34

SEC. 3.  

The Legislature finds and declares that a special law
35is necessary and that a general law cannot be made applicable
36within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California
37Constitution because the City of Sacramento and the City of
38Oakland have unique and historic roles in reporting data regarding
39city attorney sponsored unlawful detainer actions and outcomes
P11   1to the California Research Bureau in assessing the effectiveness
2of this program.

3

SEC. 4.  

If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
4this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
5local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
6pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
74 of Title 2 of the Government Code.

8

SEC. 5.  

This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
9immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within
10the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into
11immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:

12In order that the City of Sacramento and the City of Oakland
13have all the tools they need for the protection of public safety at
14the earliest time, it is necessary that the bill go into effect
15immediately.



O

    94